Quantum Blockchain Techn... Share Discussion Threads

[spary1] 10/4/2022 08:27

Oh I Think that’s exactly what you are Cryptominer! Your date joining here seem to be when FG found problems with the way 64 bit managed miner one. I think you have something to do with this, this would clearly explain a massive amount and why you don’t know what your on about!

The nominal settlement price, under the termination agreement, reflects the acknowledgement by 64Bit Ltd of its mismanagement of the Joint Venture operations, including a wrongful allocation of the partnership’s resources, mainly during the start-up phase.

[cryptominer] 09/4/2022 20:27

Spary1 I'm NOT an ex employee of 64 Bit!!!! I only see that the DC in Serbia mined zero (very strange because the miners, if exist, are quite plug and play): FACT. I start thinking that you are someone in the QBT staff and your task is to promote the shares.

[bulgarian] 09/4/2022 19:43

244dk, some balanced points, as usual.

[spary1] 09/4/2022 16:40

Cryptominer you are going back 4years , again you are posting saying it doesn’t. Seriously get a grip, it’s clear you are only here to troll. Why don’t you go and post on shares you are interested in as 100% of your posts troll with the QBT previously named CLP Bitcoin project!

This was being run by 64 bit Ltd who obviously did something wrong as we were awarded their half for one euro

Now your joining date is very odd Cryptominer, just as CLP launch investigation into what’s going on it seems? Wondering if you are an ex employee of 64bit Ltd with a grudge


The nominal settlement price, under the termination agreement, reflects the acknowledgement by 64Bit Ltd of its mismanagement of the Joint Venture operations, including a wrongful allocation of the partnership’s resources, mainly during the start-up phase.

[sharetalk] 09/4/2022 16:28

Located in Italy where they have a deal for cheap hydro electricity?

[cryptominer] 09/4/2022 16:08

And what about the mining DC in Serbia costed 400.000 Euro and, impossible to believe, mined zero???? Does it exist???

[sharetalk] 09/4/2022 15:38

244, you are talking about two different companies, with no connection or read across, and thus no direct relevance to the point you are trying to make other than in the most general sense. Fact is that QBT are likely to be telling the truth, otherwise they would be committing fraud in their press releases and interviews. I take it you have no evidence of fraud? Regarding progress by their crypto experts, it's not realistic to expect them to release every minute detail into the public domain but that does not mean to say they have not made excellent class leading progress in accordance with their press releases and interviews. Even other companies with whom they are working have to sign Non Disclosure Agreements in order to help protect the interlectual property and know how. If you want to know more about the technicals, look at patents approved or pending, or await those to be filed.

[244dk] 09/4/2022 14:24

It's no different from those on the msmn board stating that Georgina Energy would list by the end of March, Fact! It didn't happen and who knows if it ever will. We are making decisions based on face value, we don't know how much work the company has done or what the anonymous crypto expert has achieved. Time will tell and I hope it meets some of our expectations.

[spary1] 09/4/2022 12:16

244DK yep it says could be, Cryptominer has stated “ it is quite impossible that it starts mining this year. " really? That’s a bold trolling statement.

Hence he is being asked to clarify this by Iglen, how can you state that as the case when he has no idea what the company have planned or where they are regarding this. He has no idea.

You can only use the info provided via RNS or Media interview and hope it’s done as stated within these timelines.

[244dk] 09/4/2022 11:54

"Could be mining" is not definite spary. Its like saying the 2nd patent application is anticipated to be filed by the end of February. It's like you saying you were looking forward to the results at the end of March. Nothing is definite until it happens.

[hazl] 09/4/2022 11:32

Of general interest.

[spary1] 09/4/2022 11:28

Iglen asked you this question Cryptotroller, you said it’s impossible for them to start mining, you have no idea where they are and what they are planning

criptominer, I asked you a simple question, Do you think QBT have misled investors with that RNS.? You have come on here stating you are the expert so I would like to know your opinion. You categorically stated and I quote "it is quite impossible that it starts mining this year. " Therefore, if QBT are releasing RNS stating they could be mining in Q2 2022 (this year) they are potentially lying by your own statement.

[cryptominer] 09/4/2022 11:10

iglenn it is according YOUR posts that if at the end of Q2 QBT doesn't start mining then QBT have misled their investors with RNS. So before end Q2 I have nothing to answer to you.

[hazl] 09/4/2022 11:00

Quantum AI is the place to be at the moment,it seems.

[iglenn] 08/4/2022 22:43

Cripto, you didnt answer me. Do you think QBT have misled their investors with that RNS.?

[hazl] 08/4/2022 22:27

It is the weekend at least.

Enjoy.

[spary1] 08/4/2022 22:22

Logged back in under Quaterbrain have we, said this to the Bulgarian ID earlier

[cryptominer] 08/4/2022 22:09

There is only one system to prove that works: two miners connected to a pool and one with QBT booster. Then see the BTC mined by each miner. VERY SIMPLE and I wait for the results.

[spary1] 08/4/2022 22:01

Based on data we have recorded to date, we expect to see a higher performance than originally estimated; this is mainly due to the optimisations which will be included in the second patent application, based on the work of our cryptography expert and the coding techniques implemented by our FPGA/ASIC Design Team.

[cryptominer] 08/4/2022 21:54

Iglenn only at the end of Q2 2022 we will know who is right. I wait....