Quantum Blockchain Techn... Share Discussion Threads

[allenquatermain] 01/12/2021 11:27

On 5 Nov21 @ 20:40 when the share price was 3.45 bellend shanew48 wrote

*is right, 100 bagger potential here within the next few Months no doubt*

So in the “next few months” he is predicting 345p

BWAHAHAHA

[allenquatermain] 01/12/2021 11:26

2.85

Sparey1 and Stevebrr that was soooooo obvious

HILARIOUS

[purplepelmets] 01/12/2021 11:26

you called this one right Allen, we all know it.

[allenquatermain] 01/12/2021 11:24

DOWN to 2.85

Hey stevebrrr and sparey1 - I am laughing at you goons

[stevebrrr] 01/12/2021 10:57

I see our loving casanovas are hard at work bashing again today, libel now, well done hedge fund boys, I thank you. Why not tell us, who is your client? The discovery process will find out anyway.

PurplePelmets = Limited access.
Getting a full set of em.
looooooloooooool
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
COPIED for the record.
limited access30 Nov '21 - 23:10 - 9319 of 9337
0 4 0
For any of QBTs 'statements' to have any merit or traction, the evidence needs to be peer reviewed and freely available.

Anyone can say they have an expert (unnamed) and a R&D company (non-disclosed) and a product (loosely defined) on just about anything.

This is probably one of the most 'in your face' elaborate cons that the market has seen for a long time, and I suspect they (QBT) and a few others might get into a lot of trouble over this.

As ever the proof will be in the pudding ;)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Libel
LAW
a published false statement that is damaging to a person's reputation; a written defamation.
"he was found guilty of a libel on a Liverpool inspector of taxes"

[purplepelmets] 01/12/2021 10:57

as depressing here as a euthanasia conference. All the spark has gone out. And down we go...

[spary1] 01/12/2021 10:17

Quaterbrain, why have you joined only 1 month ago yet have over 500 trolling posts on a share you have no interest in apparently and you hate anyone that posts here, really, we all know your a multi ID with no balls to post under your main ID, would make you the coward/tool imho.

Seriously though what a bellend

BWAHAHAHA

[allenquatermain] 01/12/2021 09:43

Hey sparey1

Is the share price under 3p you tool

BWAHAHAHA

[spary1] 01/12/2021 09:00

Pmsl at your posts purplehelmet, you really are one sad fruitcake, how’s your £36 prediction for ARB going ?

[altcoin] 01/12/2021 08:48

You cant call BLU sensible haha

[purplepelmets] 01/12/2021 08:40

market rewarding quality companies today. BLU, a sensible micro cap play on crypto(who name their staff and investments fully) are up 20%. Nice, very nice indeed.

[allenquatermain] 01/12/2021 08:13

Spary1 can you remind me of the share price ?

Is it under 3p

BWAHAHAHA

[knigel] 01/12/2021 08:08

I meant more their outlooks, projections and investor expectations - to say QBT is the only company on the market or sector were a couple of posters have issues with corporate governance is simply laughable - you should read the split views on MIN or VAST for example. There are agendas here as hidden as apparently our QBT :-) and btw PP you are free to post here but you did say you were departing to new ventures..

[broomrigg] 01/12/2021 07:56

Relax everyone and ignore the multi ID fruitcakes....if the market sympathised with their views the shares would not be at 3p.....more like 0.25p at best. They are not more savvy than the market and nobody of any significance pays any attention to what goes on on this board or any other because the boards are full of fairy tales of every sort from all sides.

[purplepelmets] 01/12/2021 07:48

Spary. You are a blowhard.

[spary1] 01/12/2021 07:40

Nope again you lie Helmet, as I said look how many nut trolls are on here like yourself trying to protect there ARB investments, I certainly wouldn’t want to be named and have morons like you threatening me or my family especially when big money is involved!!

[purplepelmets] 01/12/2021 07:33

ARB have named all their staff/team/experts. So have every other company. Its only QBT that has this wall of secrecy, and it only gets away with it because the fanboys are too balls deep to see sense, or to even want to see what is going on. A very unique situation and IMO limited access will be proven correct on all points.

[knigel] 01/12/2021 07:29

Wonder if he would say the same about ARB or other similar companies or is just picking QBT out for some reason??

[spary1] 01/12/2021 06:56

Limited Access is a dirty trolling liar, have coppied it’s post below before it gets hidden or deleted as one for the company to deal with.

The company have to run all the news through the nomad who will check out who has been hired, why they wish to remain anonymous (which is clear to see why with the nuts that post here) and also with the company they are dealing with. Where I work there has been an issue with a bigger company stopping the same distribution of items to us a smaller company from a supplier, seems to be how threatened businesses work. It’s better if nobody knows then the bigger companies can’t shut us out!

Limited access30 Nov '21 - 23:10 - 9319 of 9322
0 0 0
For any of QBTs 'statements' to have any merit or traction, the evidence needs to be peer reviewed and freely available.

Anyone can say they have an expert (unnamed) and a R&D company (non-disclosed) and a product (loosely defined) on just about anything.

This is probably one of the most 'in your face' elaborate cons that the market has seen for a long time, and I suspect they (QBT) and a few others might get into a lot of trouble over this.

As ever the proof will be in the pudding ;)

[tracy_moore] 01/12/2021 06:36

limited access put actual names to the perpetrators of this " con " and I don't mean hiding behind " they " or " a few others " man up up and back up your accusations with names. Easy to fling mud hiding anonymously in a bedsit isn't it.

[allenquatermain] 01/12/2021 06:29

I’m waiting for the freaks to appear

This is so much fun

[stevebrrr] 01/12/2021 00:19

They want their 5p and 10p options in the money asap imo. Important to note:
However, as a first step, the initial phase of prototype testing of a 5nm ASIC will not cost the Company much more than the same process for a 7nm ASIC.

[stevebrrr] 01/12/2021 00:15

Yes hubert agreed. Doubling chip/system speed vs fastest competitor in our sector cannot be ignored for long. Apart from this NDA today, someone else out there will likely partner up and pay up to get their hands on the tech for first mover advantage in the market.

FROM RNS TODAY:
The rationale to move from a 7nm to 5nm, is because the estimated speed of QBT’s proprietary Bitcoin mining ASIC is expected to be at least twice as fast as the leading international Bitcoin miner manufacturer, before taking into account the optimisations of a second patent under development, which are yet to be factored in.

The Company will, therefore, move directly to developing a 5nm ASIC prototype, although it will still consider a phase of testing, as an intermediate step, on the 12nm ASIC, as announced on 5 November 2021.

A Non-Disclosure Agreement (“NDA”) has been signed with an international research & development organisation, which is active in the field of nanoelectronics, and which will give the Company access to one of the few 5nm semiconductor fabrication plants currently operational in the world.

The Company recognises that this significant step change, from 7nm to 5nm will, with regards to industrial production be significantly more expensive than its original strategy. However, as a first step, the initial phase of prototype testing of a 5nm ASIC will not cost the Company much more than the same process for a 7nm ASIC.