Quadrise Fuels Share Discussion Threads

[kreature] 28/1/2023 08:47

Did they buy a new ship especially, not knowing that the December start date for the trial wouldn’t happen ? Not knowing that Q1 wouldn’t happen? Not knowing that there was no msar fuel supply ?

[kreature] 28/1/2023 08:42

Yes, looks like they had to buy a whole new ship to be compatible with the fuel theory? So how’s that going to work with the rest of the fleet?

[hazl] 28/1/2023 00:39

I will remind anyone, or inform those who might not have seen the posts from last night, that the Leandra had arrived ....last night at around 8'o'clock so we can look forward to testing,hopefully soon.

This of course is the ship that MSC procured especially for testing QFI's fuel.
Out of coverage just now looking at this.

[hazl] 28/1/2023 00:38

The childish one with the emojis is up late.

[kreature] 27/1/2023 23:05

What’s alarming to me is, why aren’t Sepsa making the fuel like before ?

[kreature] 27/1/2023 22:33

Yes, hopefully the ship won’t mind waiting there for say a year of two while a fuel supply is created from nothing ?

[hazl] 27/1/2023 20:55

I will remind anyone, or inform those who might not have seen the posts from last night, that the Leandra had arrived ....last night at around 8'o'clock so we can look forward to testing,hopefully soon.

This of course is the ship that MSC procured especially for testing QFI's fuel.
Out of coverage just now looking at this.



IMO

[hazl] 27/1/2023 20:46

Oh my goodness what boring repetitive posts


Hardly anything about the company just about themselves and their little successes!


I am not a long suffering shareholder!

I bought in as a very interested shareholder, to QFI's alternative fuel, having see you lot do nothing but deramp for simply years.


As soon as there are a few relevant posts as there were last night....you feverishly try to cover them up with down right nonsense!

I didn't ever expect this to be a quick trade or I would have got out in October on that stupendous rise.
It is clear that you either have nothing interesting in your lives or you are paid to be here.

I am interested in this company at a bad time for the general markets and intend to keep up my research.

IMO





1

[hazl] 27/1/2023 18:50

How much do you get paid to sit here day after day spouting waffle?

Sad really.

[kreature] 27/1/2023 18:46

If you assume all the news to be fake, then you can’t be disappointed. Eg trial to begin 2022 at the latest

[hazl] 27/1/2023 17:34

Look at that whopping great rise in October!
We could have that again if the right news comes in!

[hazl] 27/1/2023 17:18

Valuation: Modest adoption transformational



'We are not presenting forecasts at this stage. However, as a rough guide, based on data from the company, our scenario analysis calculates that even modest adoption of MSAR or bioMSAR could generate material revenues and take the company to sustainable profitability.'

This was the more uptodate one that I meant to post.
Edison.

[hazl] 27/1/2023 17:16

As the potential demand for bioMSAR is so significant, Quadrise is keen to secure sources of feedstock for the production of both bioMSAR and a future net-zero fuel. Alternatives include lignin, which is a renewable, wood-derived fuel source and cellulose sugars from renewable biomass and wood derived sources. The company has entered into a JDA with lignin biofuel specialists Vertoro under which the two companies will seek to progress the use of Vertoro’s advanced crude sugar oil as a cost-effective supplement or alternative to glycerine in bioMSAR. Quadrise has already produced stable blends of Vertoro’s crude sugar oil based bioMSAR emulsions at laboratory scale. The two companies intend to schedule diesel engine tests during the next twelve months and have filed a joint patent for crude sugar oil based bioMSAR.

[kreature] 27/1/2023 16:47

No news is good news tbf

[hazl] 27/1/2023 15:40

It is purely drifting because of lack of news.
I don't know why you people bother with your fairy stories,marking each other up.

[kreature] 27/1/2023 12:49

Nazl…possibly best not to tell a qualified accountant to do the maths lol. However, I did the maths below and got zero? Will try again tho

‘That 8% equates to 28,058 tons. So: QFI royalty = $3,778 per ton.’

[sallad3] 27/1/2023 12:37

HAZL

So in 2021 MSC used 350,724 tons of bunker fuel.

That 8% equates to 28,058 tons. So: QFI royalty = $3,778 per ton.

HFO price is currently $746 per ton.

You do the maths.

[sallad3] 27/1/2023 12:29

HAZL

QFI paid Edison and if they can't work it out and merely recite QFI management then we mere mortals have to.

[hazl] 27/1/2023 12:24

I think it is definitely you who needs help with maths!
Posting a lot of things that are not relevant to confuse the onlookers.







'We are not presenting forecasts at this stage. However, as a rough guide, based on data from the company, our scenario analysis calculates that even modest adoption of MSAR could generate material revenues and take the company to sustainable profitability. For example, adoption across only 8% of MSC’s global fleet could generate around $106m in licence revenues and require minimal capex.'



Modest adoption....'transformational' apparently.


imo