Powerhouse Energy Share Discussion Threads

[lagosboy] 07/2/2019 12:56

Please spare us the morality argument - like all on here, you invested to line your own pockets. If you were so concerned about making a difference there are far more positive ways to achieve this.

Do not forget the likes of Bond and his Chum KA from their Linc energy days did not seem to share your concerns about the environment- hypocrites of the worst kind.

Why are you driving around in a Maserati - surely that cannot much cop for the environment either!

When a shareholder with NO sector, engineering or relevant background ends up as a consultant to bang down doors for a supposedly high powered firm providing structured solutions provider to the energy-from-waste (EfW) sector I think that's a pretty clear signal that this is all going down the pan - explains why KA jumped ship if indeed he was not pushed.

Anyway I wish you luck consulting for W2T, they have never yet provided a single structured solution to anyone or generated any income so maybe you will be their Messiah.

[lagosboy] 07/2/2019 12:56

Please spare us the morality argument - like all on here, you invested to line your own pockets. If you were so concerned about making a difference there are far more positive ways to achieve this.

Do not forget the likes of Bond and his Chum KA from their Linc energy days did not seem to share your concerns about the environment- hypocrites of the worst kind.

Why are you driving around in a Maserati - surely that cannot much cop for the environment either!

When a shareholder with NO sector, engineering or relevant background ends up as a consultant to bang down doors for a supposedly high powered firm providing structured solutions provider to the energy-from-waste (EfW) sector I think that's a pretty clear signal that this is all going down the pan - explains why KA jumped ship if indeed he was not pushed.

Anyway I wish you luck consulting for W2T, they have never yet provided a single structured solution to anyone or generated any income so maybe you will be their Messiah.

[whatsthepoint] 07/2/2019 12:06

It's a sad state of affairs when all your posts have to be negative. What is wrong with investing in something that you have then decided that you want to help to try to make a difference because the cause is such a rewarding achievement !

[vatnabrekk] 07/2/2019 11:36

OK Wazzza, thanks for the confirmation. Hope I haven't stirred up a hornets' nest, though!

[on target] 07/2/2019 11:36

According to his linkedin profile he works for Waste2tricity.

[superbarnet] 07/2/2019 11:11

Filter him and the irritation goes away

[whatsthepoint] 07/2/2019 11:03

Yes he is the one and the same that is me and I am retired it's not my fault HL have not updated their website? What a load of nonsense being posted by our resident bitter ex owner or shareholder mr lagosboy. Who I believe is none other than the mad scientist Peter Jenny who invented the pyrometer system this is all based on. He had many shares 40 or 50 Mil at one stage I guess selling them all at a pittance still winds him up every day and he doesn't want to see anyone else make any money hence his obsession to moan

[vatnabrekk] 07/2/2019 10:44

I'm sure I recall someone on here some time ago saying that Paul Warwick was a retired Financial Adviser from Hargreaves Lansdown. That cannot be the case, because upon trawling through the internet I get indications that that Paul Warwick is not retired and still works for Hargreaves Lansdown. So the Hargreaves' Paul Warwick cannot be our "wazzza".

[nelson5100] 07/2/2019 08:41

I remember a certain ramper posting that the unit would sell itself and that no sales team would be needed.


Not forgetting all the very detailed profit forecasts and on the L S *

[superbarnet] 06/2/2019 19:18

Just filter him I did. There is some interesting news on the other site about w2tricity. It seems we are now moving forwards with purpose hence the rise today.

[lagosboy] 06/2/2019 13:42

Spin - the technology can achieve diddlysquat if it does not exist.

They are commenting on the feasibility of a design only for a 25 tonne unit or 8x 3 tonne unit or 5x 5 tonne unit

The feasibility study has been proven to be of very little value as evidenced by the share price and KA departure.

[on target] 06/2/2019 13:15

Wrong again lagosboy:

'The Statement of Feasibility reads: “The PowerHouse Energy Group’s DMG® Waste-to-Energy technology can convert *25 tonnes per day* of feedstock comprising high calorific value waste materials.”'

[lagosboy] 06/2/2019 12:51

but it does not define full scale

its a feasibility study on an engineering design, not a study of a of a full commercial scale working unit on an uninterrupted basis with mixed feedstocks.

Its spin, its meaningless outside an initial early stage evaluation light years away from a commercially viable unit and business model and that's why the company is still worthless which I note you did not disagree with.

[on target] 06/2/2019 12:11

Incorrect lagosboy, the successful assessment by DNV GL was on the full-scale commercial design, as it states very clearly in the RNS:



PowerHouse Energy Group plc (AIM: PHE), the UK technology company pioneering hydrogen production from waste plastic and used tyres is pleased to announce it has received an independent “Statement of Feasibility” for its proprietary *full-scale commercial engineering design* for the waste to power and waste to hydrogen technology processes known as DMG®.

[lagosboy] 06/2/2019 12:07

linesal2 - I really must pull you up on your statement ''the technology has it's potential independently agreed'' as it is a material mis-representation of the facts.

There has been no assessment of the units commercial viability merely a feasibility study conducted on the basis of it being likely to be able to produce hydrogen and electricity from waste plastics and end of use tyres.

The feasibility study does not speak as to scaling up of the unit, using other and mixed waste inputs, maintenance requirements, hydrogen quality, continuous operation and uninterrupted production of hydrogen and electricity, ability to secure planning permissions to fit the Phe business model which would include explosion risk near densely inhabited areas. The list goes on.

It dose not address costs/revenues, funding or any funding issues, so just because it maybe feasible on the basis of the technology does not mean it is commercially viable.

Ask yourself, if your interpretation and reliance upon the feasibility study is correct why has the share price and company valuation drifted down rather than rising sharply.

Right now Phe is pretty much valued as being worthless, it is not a start up, it has been around for years and yet no interest whatsoever of true substance just a bunch of RNS announcements which always seem to amount to absolutely diddly-squat.

The CEO has just gone, so its beginning to look like yet another AIM car crash.

[linesal2] 06/2/2019 11:34

We all knew commercially KA was on the back foot- Just depends who they get on-board now.
The technology has it's potential independently agreed, we now need a strong commercial strategist to get it built and then the fun will start.
Mine are in the draw for another year but things can change fast.
I truly hope it works for more than my own benefit monetarily.

[on target] 06/2/2019 09:07

Could the fact he became CEO of PHE on 1st February be something to do with it? Conflict of interest?

[lagosboy] 06/2/2019 08:43

Must have been a lovers spat between the lot of them. Wonder why ?

[nelson5100] 05/2/2019 21:08

David Ryan is no longer a director at Waste2Tricity as of 1st February.

This is three days after Waste2Tricity delayed filing its annual accounts by shortening its accounting reference date from 29 April to 28 April.

This, their 2018 accounts have to be filed by 28 April 2019.