We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Powerhouse Energy Group Plc | LSE:PHE | London | Ordinary Share | GB00B4WQVY43 | ORD 0.5P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.025 | 1.72% | 1.475 | 1.40 | 1.55 | 1.50 | 1.45 | 1.45 | 12,493,087 | 12:11:21 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Scrap & Waste Materials-whsl | 380k | -46.2M | -0.0111 | -1.32 | 61.11M |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
27/2/2023 07:32 | What a disgrace imo. | tewkesbury | |
27/2/2023 07:22 | Announced today that Howard White, Josh White and Ben White have all reduced their holdings by selling shares.If I am not mistaken, that is the same Howard White who recently said in an interview he would be "filling my boots" with shares, if he could but obviously now dosn't seem to feel that way if his actions are anything to go by.All three dumping stock. What does that infer about the outlook and what they really think of the investment merits?Lemmings and mushrooms only. | ken chung | |
27/2/2023 07:19 | I have seen late reporting before but 3 of the White family over a year late!!!! | linesal2 | |
26/2/2023 12:17 | The problem here is somthing I have tried to inform the rampers on this thread many times, is that the technology that PHE/HUI are promoting does not work commercially. It might work using a feedstock of used tyres as the temprture required is low enough, but I am not sure it would be commercial. It does seem that all the rampers on this thread are really "flogging a dead horse" or is it that they are so committed that they cannot see a way out for them other than PHE to be successful against all the odds. Trying to get into bed with other large companies in the hope that their technical expertise might make the technology PHE are using commericial, will not happen. PHE and HUI are both "dead ducks" only kept alive by the rampers of their shares. | luckey jim | |
26/2/2023 09:37 | Such potential but this management will never deliver it | juju44 | |
26/2/2023 08:51 | Some people (Greens) tell us that old tyres shouldn't be disposed off by processing through pyrolysis systems such as the DMG to produce hydrogen or electricity because the rubber can be recycled and used for other purposes such as playgrounds for children, roads, and many other uses. Which would be brilliant if it were true, and if all used tyres could be recycled in that way. But here's the reality. Here is what is happening to masses of used tyres today. Clearly these ones are not being recycled, and there are lots more mountains of tyres all over the world, as well as those that are dumped into landfill sites. So come on Greens, open your eyes, stop living in cloud cuckoo land. It's time to support pyrolysis system such as PHE's DMG which can help to clean up these abominations and reduce the poison that's going into our environment. | vatnabrekk | |
25/2/2023 14:39 | The trouble is that deccer is right and you know it. What do they do all day. | tewkesbury | |
24/2/2023 16:52 | decerri - have patience. All will be revealed in March as a follow on from the Petrovac involvement in the Protos JV. Don't you see! | smokey 1o3 | |
24/2/2023 15:16 | Vatnabrekk, I wouldn't waste my time talking to management and shouldn't have to. They should announce bad news to the market and not have to be chased on the telephone, which wouldn't change the news itself anyway, and nothing will change my view. Even you agreed a few months ago they should have made the announcements of the negative news from Scotland and I think Ireland. | deccer1 | |
24/2/2023 15:06 | deccer1 - It really has no significance. That is it IMHO. | smokey 1o3 | |
24/2/2023 14:22 | Ask Keith Riley. | vatnabrekk | |
24/2/2023 14:12 | If its so insignificnt, why did PHE announce it so positively when they tought it was going ahead? Also why havn't they been similarly open and discosed its subsequent termination? | deccer1 | |
24/2/2023 13:58 | I wouldn’t waste your time Smokey. Desperate trolls clutching at straws. | cash2020 | |
24/2/2023 13:54 | deccer1 - Significant in terms of what? There is and never has been any definitive financial agreement between Peel and PHE for this project so as Riley has said it has no significant bearing on PHE's current contractual business arrangements. Surely Peel were wise not to get into a legal argument over this one planning consent it being better to deal with the matter in the round by providing evidence it is not "incineration", and so clear the way forward for any other potential deals in Scotland of which there must be many. It seems you are pushing this simply as a disruptor. I think you should discontinue do so incessantly saying the matter is significant, when ipso facto it is not. | smokey 1o3 | |
24/2/2023 12:51 | After PHE announced on 11/11/2022 that Peel's planning application for the Scottish incinerator had been "called in" for review, Peel were subseuently reported to have withdrawn the application, thus terminating the proposal. As far as I am aware, PHE have failed to disclose the latter negative news, even though it was arguably even more significant than the call in which they did disclose. I personally won't trust a company that behaves like this. | deccer1 | |
24/2/2023 11:57 | decceri1 - What are you talking about. Mr Riley has dealt with the matter very openly and in detail in an RNS when he said:- "This is what is referred to as a "call-in" of the planning permission obtained by Peel. It is not yet known what the process will be from hereon. Any delay to implementation of the permission that this will cause will not impact the immediate business of PHE. Indeed, presents an excellent opportunity to clear up what is a lack of clarity in the regulations concerning the thermal treatment of wastes that use advanced thermal treatments to produce a synthetic gas from which other products are made. "The call-in is related to the Scottish Government's moratorium on incineration and as such the Rothesay Dock facility stands to serve as a test case in Scotland and possibly elsewhere. The laws and regulations governing thermal treatments of wastes are more or less the same throughout the UK and across Europe. In law, a thermal process that treats waste of any sort is referred to as an "incinerator", whether it burns that waste or not. The PHE DMGâ does not burn the plastic waste, but instead converts it into another form - ie syngas and hydrogen - whilst at the same time removing some of the carbon in the waste instead of emitting it as carbon dioxide. This distinction is not properly considered under current regulations and a formal examination of the situation would help clear future regulation of these processes and give recognition to how what PHE is doing aids recycling and helps achieve a circular economy. "If requested, the Company will assist Peel in the provision of any evidence that may be required to support the case that the planning permission should be upheld." | smokey 1o3 | |
24/2/2023 08:04 | Still failing to disclose Peel have withdrawn the application for the Scottish project and abandoned the first Irish site. Awful. | deccer1 | |
23/2/2023 23:45 | The largest tyres graveyard in the world: What an abomination! We need to get some DMG machines over there asap! | vatnabrekk | |
23/2/2023 21:00 | Sorry, if already posted. I see this on my feed. hxxps://simplywall.s | myu_qpr | |
23/2/2023 11:25 | Under the agreement Petrofac will provide engineering design and supply chain development services on PHE's pipeline of projects, INCLUDING THE PLASTICS TO HYDROGEN PROJECT AT PROTOS. Peel NRE Ltd has also confirmed Petrofac as the preferred delivery partner for the proposed construction of the facility at PLOT Plot 10b, Protos Energy Park. | smokey 1o3 | |
23/2/2023 09:31 | The Petrofac deal is enormous. It also shows that Petrofac have huge confidence in how the PHE system works. It also gives potential buyers the confidence that a specialist company will deal with installation. This deal ticks many boxes. | schofi2 | |
23/2/2023 07:39 | Any future for phe down the line is going to include a share offering for funds unless they can build 3 and get paid within the next year. Not going to happen . Can imagine 10 year into future there will be many of these or a n other speedier company across Europe | moontheloon | |
23/2/2023 07:34 | Phe is currently priced as a risky play that could go either way, the CEO if they have one only has to fart in an upbeat manner and this will do 20%. Might not hold it , but it is an ingredient to the greater good. They wouldn't be doing deals with petrofac If deal was going south. So more turbulence I guess till and If they get the spv. Should imagine they will get at least one done.... Eventually. Scotland and Ireland are abit cloudy now so that's a weigh for me. | moontheloon |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions