ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for monitor Customisable watchlists with full streaming quotes from leading exchanges, such as LSE, NASDAQ, NYSE, AMEX, Bovespa, BIT and more.

PHNX Phoenix Group Holdings Plc

538.00
3.50 (0.65%)
26 Jul 2024 - Closed
Delayed by 15 minutes
Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Phoenix Group Holdings Plc LSE:PHNX London Ordinary Share GB00BGXQNP29 ORD 10P
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  3.50 0.65% 538.00 538.50 539.00 540.50 532.50 533.00 1,167,597 16:35:07
Industry Sector Turnover Profit EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap
Life Insurance 22.81B -116M -0.1158 -46.55 5.35B
Phoenix Group Holdings Plc is listed in the Life Insurance sector of the London Stock Exchange with ticker PHNX. The last closing price for Phoenix was 534.50p. Over the last year, Phoenix shares have traded in a share price range of 436.40p to 563.60p.

Phoenix currently has 1,001,544,989 shares in issue. The market capitalisation of Phoenix is £5.35 billion. Phoenix has a price to earnings ratio (PE ratio) of -46.55.

Phoenix Share Discussion Threads

Showing 11201 to 11222 of 11800 messages
Chat Pages: Latest  460  459  458  457  456  455  454  453  452  451  450  449  Older
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
18/6/2024
13:32
I've lived through a few Labour governments and never found them cheap or productive.
gbh2
18/6/2024
11:52
We all have bad day gbh2. Mine was earlier at B&Q ;-(

I know little of Starmer so I hope you are at least partly incorrect scruff1.

mcunliffe1
18/6/2024
10:11
MC - I only trust the next dividend payment, after that it's all guesswork imo.

My plan, I currently stand to receive a few thousand pound from the next dividend, however I "think/hope" the capital gain on my holding in the run up to the next dividend with exceed what I would receive if taking said dividend. If so, how I act will be governed by what we find out once Labour start to show their true colours.

All that aside, calling a fellow contributor a silly sod, is not my usual approach (unless I'm dealing with a brainless fool attempting to destroy a Forum) so I apologise, I was having a bad day.

gbh2
18/6/2024
09:18
On that same logic gbh2 there's no guarantee that the 'next' dividend (interim) will be paid. So, technically, we buy shares in the hope of (in this instance) 11%

I can see what you're trying to suggest but other than Labour nationalising Phoenix Group I could not envisage how even Labour's antics could have such a devastating effect in such a short timeframe to cause the cancellation of dividends.

One possibility may be....... Starmer forms the next government and is appointed Prime Minister. Waits a month, resigns and hands over power to Corbyn who with the backing of the unions is then elected leader of Labour and hence, Prime Minister.

Cameron, May, Boris, Truss, Sunak. Precedence well and truly set.

mcunliffe1
18/6/2024
07:48
The dividend left for this year 5.25% when buying at £4.83
No one knows what may happen when the Labour thieves are in government so claims of 11% are silly imo.

gbh2
17/6/2024
20:14
Funny old world. I'm always looking for what I perceive to be "silly" and am usually gleeful to alight upon it. Takes all kinds to make a market I suppose☺ᥧ9;
cwa1
17/6/2024
18:45
The greater the pressure on the spring, the bigger the rebound.
Unless PHNX inform otherwise, I'll take it that everything under the bonnet is tickety-boo & the slide in the share price is just markets being silly.
And we don't want silly.

marine boy
17/6/2024
17:38
Better than an annuity. Assuming the PHNX share price doesn't drop to zero an income seeker comes out OK compared to the annuity buyer.
mcunliffe1
17/6/2024
17:12
Not a daft sod at all?!Buying today gives you a divi of 11%. Basic maths.If someone bought higher up they also have unrealised capital losses. Obviously (smacks head). That wasn't the point being made though.
cyberbub
17/6/2024
16:37
I've traded it down so my ave is ca 495p and look to dump it in the run up to the next ex dividend date, at which point I hope to have ca 4% profit.

None of which alters my opinion of the silly claims re 11% dividend when it's clearly as consequence of a dire share price performance.

gbh2
17/6/2024
15:57
gbh2 - capital losses can't be overlooked.

That said, you did post on here earlier today saying you'd added. So presumably you see the current share price as decent value, even though you plan to ditch once you're in profit.

lord loads of lolly
17/6/2024
15:41
"11% divi at these prices?"

Daft sod, look at your capital loss,

gbh2
17/6/2024
15:40
The dividend looks great until you study the long term share price.

Its trend has generally been downwards since the end of 2020.

Over the past 5 years, the share price has dropped more than 30%
And over 1 year, it's down nearly 13%

Both of which put the divi into perspective.

Things may improve once we see there's a sustained trend towards lower interest rates. But in a way that's a given already, so probably priced in to some extent. The only unknown is how far & fast rates here & elsewhere will fall.

I'm not a holder here yet, but am monitoring the share price and would be tempted to buy at around 450p if it ever gets there.

lord loads of lolly
17/6/2024
14:19
11% divi at these prices?
bpc10
17/6/2024
13:11
scruff1: I'm fine with wider discussions than PHNX even on a Monday as little will be happening on the markets between now and July 4th in my opinion.

But, you may get some more input on Chomsky if you ask on the SHA thread here on ADVFN. It would also benefit us on the same thread to have an input, even if second hand, about events in Dubai and A.I. in general.

SHA is here:

mcunliffe1
17/6/2024
13:00
Well whatever Marr believes, whether he is inside The Matrix or not, here is the three minute clip of Chomsky and Marr that I just attempted to paraphrase, well worth watching IMO:
cassini
17/6/2024
12:53
Yep. I was aware of his linguistic and philosophical work but he seems to have become a bit of a left leaning political activist. I just wondered if anyone could provide some clarity. Thanks for your comments
scruff1
17/6/2024
12:46
Yet another lack luster day for the sp, I added again but the next time I see a profit I intend dumping the lot.
gbh2
17/6/2024
12:45
The share price remains in doldrums while no clear water for interest rate or bond yield cuts. French elections adding fuel to fire and some months away before trading update. I don’t see strong positives to recover share price in near term. Could be more pressure on the down side. Sitting on my hands until results GLA
tornado12
17/6/2024
12:44
tournesol
Not a lot to be honest but the son in law whos a director of an international company developing AI and based in Dubai is doing a PhD E-Research and technology through Lancaster University. He uses me as a sort of intellectual testing ground as he develops ideas for his thesis. I have my doubts about where AI is heading. He has no such reservations (hes in his 40s, Im in my 70s !!!) We have online debates and he sends articles for me to consider and to issue a response. The last one was largely about Chomsky (who I never thought had any great input into current AI thinking) and I thought his ideas were a tad weak. I just wondered if anyone had any deeper insight into the man that could help enlighten me. Obviously nowt to do with PHNX for which I apologise - but it was Sunday!

scruff1
17/6/2024
12:13
I thought that's exactly why he left the BBC.
skinny
17/6/2024
12:09
I remember Chomsky talking on TV to Andrew Marr about bias in the media.

From memory, Chomsky imputed that Marr was a water carrier for his masters, so to speak.

Marr was gobsmacked and a bit indignant. He asked Chomsky if he was questioning his journalistic integrity and independence?

Chomsky's reply was along the lines that Marr's bias wasn't conscious as such, but did he really think that he'd have been given his job if his masters hadn't been confident he had the right [i.e. their] world view and would therefore do the 'right' thing?

Chomsky was certainly right in the respect that one doesn't get promoted if one is going to contradict, ring the bell on, or undermine one's masters. Marr was a 'safe pair of hands', much like my Tory MP, who's first loyalty was always to his party, not his constituents, IMO.

cassini
Chat Pages: Latest  460  459  458  457  456  455  454  453  452  451  450  449  Older