We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pantheon Resources Plc | LSE:PANR | London | Ordinary Share | GB00B125SX82 | ORD 1P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.60 | 1.94% | 31.45 | 31.15 | 31.65 | 31.90 | 30.75 | 30.80 | 353,507 | 08:25:01 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural Gas Liquids | 804k | -1.45M | -0.0016 | -192.81 | 279.87M |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
02/3/2022 13:10 | I have to say that when the Guild thread was operating, this board was as calm as the local millpond. Hopefully it will return to such ways. Hopefully, the sudden drop in the share price at 12pm does not reflect any news from the camp. | chessman2 | |
02/3/2022 13:03 | Ah what a surprise that POS, the peeping Tom, and self-appointed moral voice of this board, has emerged from the shadows to have his say. | johnswan193 | |
02/3/2022 12:53 | back on filter,lifes too short. | rafthorney | |
02/3/2022 12:43 | Johnswan - you are the (second to) last person in a position to comment on a public forum on what is or isn’t a disgusting or inappropriate comment in the context of caring about other people. Reflect and think on. Please put this appetite to talk about the guild to bed as promised - continually raising it is embarrassing for those that do! | probabilityofsuccess | |
02/3/2022 12:03 | swendab1, any chance of you sticking to PANR instead of having digs at other posters? FWIW I’m optimistic the share price will glide past 140 this afternoon. | chessman2 | |
02/3/2022 11:39 | I have said before. I could never join a club or guild that would have me as a member | sandcrab2 | |
02/3/2022 11:24 | Ronald Ridout would be proud of you. | arcadian | |
02/3/2022 11:04 | This grates on a few of us. Following the conditional perfect verb with 'of' when you should write 'have' is ungrammatical. Here's the rule: The conditional perfect, would have, refers to a missed opportunity in the past. When we speak / write informally, it becomes 'would've', not 'would of'. Other examples: could of is could have or could've, should of is should have or should've, might of is might have or might've and so on | forwood | |
02/3/2022 10:59 | swendab1, so effectively you paid for your own gratification. | ngms27 | |
02/3/2022 10:14 | With the other tests taking a few days, would it be safe to assume that these tests could go on for a week or two even, as the longer the more reservoir data and characteristics well learn also these are the final tests and the primaries so no rush to do anything else after. | sirmark | |
02/3/2022 10:01 | I added 15 coins Were up-to 17 come on chaps.... top of the ADVFN board can add an extra spot light in the wake of expected news. We're now up to 32 coins. | sirmark | |
02/3/2022 09:57 | rich2006, I don't want anymore. | ngms27 | |
02/3/2022 09:53 | Good thoughts johnswan | chris0805 |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions