Pantheon Resources Share Discussion Threads

[padamster] 15/3/2023 11:20

Bull - as I’m Indian (maybe you did not know that or perhaps you did) thanks for associating me to a poppadom - it’s actually spelt - Papadum. So you like them as I love them ? 😊

[ohdearohdearohdear] 15/3/2023 11:18

"michaelsadvfn15 Mar '23 - 10:57 - 3773 of 3776
0 0 0
As it’s 22C and a clear blue sky today I’m off to the beach.

You lot enjoy sitting behind your screens typing nonsense. 😩😩😩"


Surprisingly good internet connection on the beach it seems!

[michaelsadvfn] 15/3/2023 11:13

hpcg14 Mar '23 - 22:26 - 32178 of 32183 0 1 0

Rabito - I'm not convinced there is a gas cap.

...why not call the technical experts at PANR or Schlumberger to tell the they’re wrong?

I’ll say it again, these boards are infested with idiots.

[ohdearohdearohdear] 15/3/2023 11:12

Ah thanks PoS. Who knows why he's displaying his base nature then? Maybe just a genuinely unpleasant person?

[ohdearohdearohdear] 15/3/2023 11:01

It's always good that an anonymous avatar feels the need to tell other anonymous avatars that they are off to the beach.

[michaelsadvfn] 15/3/2023 10:57

As it’s 22C and a clear blue sky today I’m off to the beach.

You lot enjoy sitting behind your screens typing nonsense. 😩😩😩

[padamster] 15/3/2023 10:55

Hello Bull 😊

[thebull8] 15/3/2023 10:51

Lmao give it up poppadom. You've been saying that for months you clown. Why would anybody listen to you

[padamster] 15/3/2023 10:46

Another chance to close your shorts. Or buy at these prices.

You have been alerted again 😊

[bigdazzlerreturns2] 15/3/2023 10:19

forwood14 Mar '23 - 19:16 - 3756 of 3765
0 1 0
Strange that Truant thinks a 10% reversal is not worth talking about. Depends what you did with it I suppose. I used it to make money!





And this is the quality of the guild members!!!

You really can’t catch your breath. I have to question everything about them with comments like the above.

So a matter of a reversal of a pence or 2 is worth talking about, (after a massive drop it’s called volatility).

But the massive drop from the 150’s to the current 20’s is nothing to worry about and the company is ready to fly again.



Errrrr wakey wakey it’s time for your cornflakes with extra creamy milk ‘creaky Guilders.’

The naive will have lost serious money on this stock, due to the rubbish spouted on here.

Dear oh dear.

[swendab1] 15/3/2023 10:09

Shhhhhhhh ………;..

[madd_rip] 15/3/2023 05:03

You and your scummy brethren of liars opened your shorts based on MW lies, and you have continued to proliferate those lies, accusing multiple certified companies, directors, operators of fraud and misdirection without offering a single shred of hard empirical evidence So no, you have about as much credibility as the lying gutter snake you are. I wouldn't trust you as far as I could kick you across a street.

[rabito79] 15/3/2023 03:52

Hpcg, so your new theory is the increased gas rates at Alkaid 2 compared to Alkaid 1 is due to a small change in X making a big change in Y. Thanks for that.Pro, yep welcome to appraisal. I remember your theory regards there not being enough pressure to keep the fracs open. I am now wondering if that was due to a small change in X making a big change in Y.

[pro_s2009] 15/3/2023 03:04

Rabito, you should change your post really.

You said...... " I look forward to next weeks webinar where hopefully we will here more regards the productivity/deliverability of the well which has likely been masked by the preferential flow of gas from the gas cap."


However there is no gas cap proven. It is a theory only, a theory used to justify the poor results so far.

So really your post should say "I look forward to next weeks webinar where hopefully we will HEAR more regards the productivity/deliverability of the well which has MAYBE OR MAYBE NOT been masked by the preferential flow of gas from the ALLEGED gas cap, IF THERE IS ONE"

PANR are very good at saying what they think, what they beleive, what is their opinion......... but not so good at coming up with cold hard factuals on things like commerciality......the goal posts keep moving......

They can keep saying they have 17 billion barrels of Oil in Place until they are red in the face, the simple fact is, whilst they "beleive" some of it will be commercially viable to extract, they have not proven so...........and having lots of people confirmed that the 17 billion OIP is there (we all know it is) the question remains is any of it actually commercially viable to produce ?

With OPEC forecasting a production surplus ahead, oil prices will remain weak and oil price forecasts will be reduced - all of which will make "marginal" economic plays become "not viable". If you currently have a not viable project, you are seriously going to struggle to raise any money to further dump into it.

[neil9327b] 14/3/2023 22:47

hpcg had it been a property of the reservoir we would have seen high levels of gas in the Alkaid 1 drill. We didn't, therefore a gas cap over pure hydrocarbons is the only explanation.

[hpcg] 14/3/2023 22:26

Rabito - I'm not convinced there is a gas cap. I think the production profile is representative of mobility through the reservoir. Methane produces well, NGLs ok, condensate a bit less, SL even less. Maybe there are heavier APIs in the solution and they just don't produce at all?

Why have models not reflected reality? I guess because the fluid flow is right on the edge. There is a very steep curve between not flowing at all and good mobility and on any steep curve a small change in X and make a big change in Y. In reality I don't care why. It is what it is and the consequences for the share price are there for all to see.