Pantheon Resources Share Discussion Threads

[sirmark] 27/1/2022 09:40

1,000 share buyer consistently purchasing :)

[rideacockhorse] 27/1/2022 09:38

It's impossible to state how stupid you look at the moment johnswan193. I'm embarrassed for you.

[sirmark] 27/1/2022 09:32

Not to get too excited but 84p breached the 94p target is next then, maybe just maybe before our first results could a pound be hit ...

[johnswan193] 27/1/2022 09:18

POS - no. It will eventually go away, I've said all along that its a temporary effect which will reduce with trading volume until its gone. In success case the volume that follows should completely eliminate it, but there may be a short term opportunity to buy more (at a higher than current level) before it is completely cleared, after which I expect the share price would break further upwards.

[scot126] 27/1/2022 09:12

Alaskan crude in the $90s + continuing inflation. Not too shabby for a macro backdrop.

I note Jay and Bob's oft cited refrain "Location, location, location."

I submit the following with a nod to huge shifts of money between different industry sectors in the stockmarket. "Rotation, rotation, rotation."

[probabilityofsuccess] 27/1/2022 09:12

mlf51 🤣

Johnswan - you may believe it’s been proved correct, but I’m sure you will openly state on this forum that it may well prove to be incorrect and you are open to accepting that?

[bit coin] 27/1/2022 09:10

I'd like to hear how deep they've drilled TW at end of first week............if they are maintaining a steady descent at a constant rate Is it possible they are nearly half way down the hole???

[johnswan193] 27/1/2022 09:07

It hasn't been proven to be incorrect, in fact to date it has been proven to be correct. It HAS been there, and its pull is the reason why the share price is not higher. All you need to do is look at the share price and question why it remains 15% lower than pre-funding highs, despite now being fully funded, better macro environment and operations on schedule.

[mlf51] 27/1/2022 09:06

I prefer my £2 effect, but thanks for worrying about me.

[probabilityofsuccess] 27/1/2022 09:00

Most do Johnswan, it’s just some (e.g. you) conflate the CB position with the ‘78p effect’, promulgate a theory and then, following peer review, when a wider audience become aware of the facts/evidence the ‘theory’ is proven incorrect and no longer has any basis……………perhaps?

EDIT: absolutely nothing wrong with a theory by the way, it’s just best to get it peer reviewed and wait for a consensus view as opposed to going nap on being correct with so much certainty that makes it look like one isn’t open-minded 😀

[johnswan193] 27/1/2022 08:50

Seems some of you simply don't have the mental capacity to understand the 78p effect.

[rideacockhorse] 27/1/2022 08:45

Intothewild, how can you have the sheer audacity to come on here and say that, when only two days ago you posted this: "Its impressive that you are unable to see this cap-effect in play, Scot. Its right there. Right there to see. Open your eyes. If this was the Matrix (which it sort of is) all I would see is the entire market thinking the number 78. But its not the Matrix, its reality. Yet I can still see it in all recent trades, movements and decisions. 78. Seems you and Winner somehow cannot."

I have to tell you sunshine, it's as plain as plain can be for everyone on this BB that Scot, Winner and others were proved 100% right - again!

Johnswan193 tried obfuscation yesterday to dig himself out of his hole when he said 78p wasn't a cap, more a 'magnet'. In a posting career littered with misinterpretations and misjudgements that comment was his 'magnet' opus. This post is yours.

[pro_s2009] 27/1/2022 08:22

A retest of 94p is on the cards soon imo.

[ottoman1453] 27/1/2022 08:20

For the present time and indeed the foreseeable future, Pantheon will surely be following a path guided not by wider market sentiment but it's own particular projects, which all now appear to be lining up, ready to be brought to fruition in one form or another.

[forwood] 27/1/2022 08:16

Am pleasantly surprised, given I am still heavily invested here. When I posted, S&P futures were down 40 pts from here and the ftse was off 150 pts.

[sirmark] 27/1/2022 08:16

A push and break of the 84p should get a retest of the 94p

[winner66] 27/1/2022 07:43

Forwood , inflationary management along with stimulus pull back caused an initial overreacted market. But it’s no surprise that a March interest rate hike in the US was / is going to happen. PANR will continue its steady rise in my opinion , we have a micro event and the only macro relevant will be the prevailing oil price once we are selling it. Today will be a great day .

[forwood] 27/1/2022 04:00

Well, the Fed has managed to knock 3.5% off the S&P, quite an achievement. I doubt the ftse will be a pretty sight today or that PANR will be immune.

[jontyfromsa] 27/1/2022 01:04

Million Dollar Question
Two great days in a row
What price do people think this share reaches pre drill results?

[johnswan193] 26/1/2022 23:49

There is no need to remind me of any oath, I have respect for the code, not for you. Being honest and trustworthy are important to me, whereas they are very obviously not important to you.

[scot126] 26/1/2022 23:39

Sigh.....just not true. I had to prompt johnswan193 to fulfil his undertaking, an undertaking he had forgotten about as soon as he received my private info.

You're still not released from that oath, johnswan193.

You are one helluva freak. Fact. Who the hell plays all these psychological games with people. Weirdo stalker.

The Guild's time has come, folks. I'd gently suggest becoming members prior to the data arriving from the tundra because you're not going to be reading any interpretation from the likes of Tele, Darcon, Rabito79 and I after that. swendab1 will walk you through it if you're interested in joining.

[johnswan193] 26/1/2022 22:28

LOL, you must have been one of the conspiracy theorists to warrant that sort of message Chris. Doesn’t surprise me given like Scot you have failed to abide by the privacy code. But don’t worry, I won’t reveal what you said to me.

Edit: Yep I was right about him being a conspiracy theorist. That particular exchange began with him suggesting I was a “confirmed shorter” on this BB, despite no prior public or private interactions with him, which led to my (appropriate) off-board DM, which was a private invitation to explain himself.

Don’t forget, I am known for my respect of the privacy code, which is why Scot chose me as the person he wished to relay confidential information to last year. That information remained private, however he didn’t like that I refused to make certain statements back to the BB in the precise way he wanted me to, (I.e. he wrote something he wanted me to write on the BB as though I had written it myself) which led to his campaign against me. He also quoted certain DMs I had sent to him on this BB knowing I would not do the same in retaliation. That should tell you everything you need to know about Scot.