We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pantheon Resources Plc | LSE:PANR | London | Ordinary Share | GB00B125SX82 | ORD 1P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.20 | 0.62% | 32.65 | 32.45 | 32.80 | 33.80 | 32.25 | 33.80 | 1,386,082 | 16:35:13 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural Gas Liquids | 804k | -1.45M | -0.0016 | -202.19 | 293.48M |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
24/1/2022 18:39 | A step forward for sure, BUT by that point they would have de-risked significantly and still buying in for $0.50+ bbl recoverable (for <50%) assuming 10 digits is $1bn. Could just as easily be $3-5bn considering the scale of the development. Jay keeps going back to $3.1/bbl paid by Oilsearch so $3-5bn for 50% of 2.2bn recoverable is in the right ballpark. | dhb368 | |
24/1/2022 18:35 | Very encouraging!! I need to listen again as well but I believe they let slip the potential partner was looking to possibly IPO in future which narrows down the field. Hillcorps?? | newandax | |
24/1/2022 18:28 | Yes 100 bopd per 6ft vertical frac would be considered excellent, this would be multiplied by the amount of frac`s on a horizontal drill. | dan de lion | |
24/1/2022 18:28 | Very interesting webinar. Of course I'm no expert but the Lower BFF at Talitha appears it should provide excellent indication of whether TW will deliver given the three frac operation. I feel more optimistic now than I did when I made my previous comment about them being really up against it for the first flow test given sub-optimal location. Also makes complete sense not to test the Upper BFF at Talitha. | johnswan193 | |
24/1/2022 17:04 | Looks like 50-80bopd expected to be a success at SMD. No such guidance for the other zones at Talitha so they'll need to elaborate on what measurement is used to determine "moveable oil". | johnswan193 | |
24/1/2022 16:59 | Many thanks Mike. Apologies for being late to get back to you. I've been unusually occupied today! Only just got online to catch the webinar! | kilgallp | |
24/1/2022 16:58 | Presentation published on website. | dhb368 | |
24/1/2022 16:56 | Hi Scot126, Thank you, that was a really useful and clear response to my question. I am very familiar with the gamestop phenomenon however I did not realise to the exact extent of their movement over to 88E (I was aware). I have been following PANR for some time and put together a case for investment (which is why I havent invested in 88E) however its not always clear unless you have years of experience in the industry. Constructive replies like yours are always appreciated rather than calling out people uncessarily. This thread could certainly do with embracing and actively spreading the PANR word through social media. | carrr595 | |
24/1/2022 16:48 | Something to consider pre-webinar? Remember the Talitha well location was selected primarily to target the shallowest SMD horizon. Think of it as the bullseye (50 and 25 points) and the other horizons moving out towards the triple bed and then double beds, further away from the ideal "bullseye" location. Theta West, for example, has been planned solely to collect as much data as possible about the BFF Lower and BFF Upper. Those are the bullseye horizons the drill is targeting and the triple bed zone and double bed zone don't apply. This is unlike Talitha #A where the SFS and BFF are certainly *present* on the dartboard but are geologically further away from the ideal "bullseye" location. Looks to me like the SFS is located in a triple bed and the BFF Lower in the outer double bed. Hope my mangled metaphor makes some sense?! | scot126 | |
24/1/2022 16:40 | Hi Carrr595 - I recognise the description of your frustration. Not because I share that sentiment necessarily (I've long ago rationalised the differential) but because your reaction to the respective share price action is logical and wholly comprehensible. "In the short run, the market Is a voting machine, but in the long run, the market is a weighing machine." - attributed to Warren Buffett Being a millenial, are you aware of the Gamestop phenomenon during the early stage of lockdown in the US? For whatever reason, either planned and paid for by 88E or simple serendipity, a large number of the Gamestop moms'n'pops alighted on 88E last March/April. Quite bizarrely, weeks would go by when 88E was the most search stock code on the OTC market. Fed by complete hogwash/misinformati It's a giant game of pass the parcel: "Enjoy the party but dance close to the exits." It's not PANR management's fault, it's ours. PANR's asset is higher quality, far larger in scale, more data has been collected, more money has been invested in 3D seismic ($80m v's virtually nothing), better location, time to first production of commercial oil, cost to deliver first production of commercial oil, far higher NPV per barrel, far more experienced management team......and lots more. It's a new world, folks. It us, retail shareholders who need to get out there and engage with the self-styled $EEENF army and explain using facts and logic why they should be looking at PANR rather than playing pass the parcel with 88E. For example, the stockmarket is currently valuing 88E's c.10% share of the combined PANR/88E oilfield at £300m and over the border (a simple line on a map, remember) 90% of that same oilfield is valued at £550m. Go figure? A statistical certainty? This mispricing will not be perpetual, thus voting => weighing. | scot126 | |
24/1/2022 16:39 | Did your " nervousness " drive you to make rude remarks about somebody's user name. | mlf51 | |
24/1/2022 16:34 | For webinar 2hrs 30mins scheduled! | johnswan193 | |
24/1/2022 16:29 | I’ve no idea why anyone would invest without fully understanding the investment case . It defies logic that people ask basic questions on a public forum and believe what they are told . Research is key , it’s all available in fact format . Who on earth dives in the sea without first knowing how to swim . Madness | winner66 | |
24/1/2022 16:17 | 88E is supported by a social media bubble and the share price has been pushed up significantly because of that manipulation. There will be a lot of money lost there by 'punters' that do not understand the investment case, the risks involved or 88Es route (or lack of) to market. PANR does not 'benefit' from such social media manipulation and more significantly the share price still has downward pressure from F and the CB holder. Any money lost here will be down to the drill bit, not misinformation online and any money made will be bags higher simply due to the lower entry point, thankfully made possible by the large sellers. Unless a holder is still looking to de-risk predrill todays price is irrelevant. | dhb368 | |
24/1/2022 16:00 | Thanks Forwood, agree if someone who is invested but questions or infers something else the hounds are out. I merely implied that should 88E release any information their reddit army and quick posting throughout their millennial cohort works wonders for their share price PANR does not have the same sense of social media presence. I am invested in PANR, and my nervousness sits around the expected bn of oil that are not independently verified (please correct me if I have that wrong) and that the share price won't move until we see promising results (hopefully in the next few weeks/months). I will add my comment about the 75p share price still remains and today showed that. I am also not invested 88E. | carrr595 | |
24/1/2022 14:34 | Don't worry about it Carr. Anyone who is not 100% gungho is likely to get pasted here. | forwood | |
24/1/2022 12:43 | Charitable? Nah | mlf51 | |
24/1/2022 12:06 | Please do as I'm looking to get more. | mlf51 |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions