Pantheon Resources Share Discussion Threads

[parker2102] 23/5/2022 08:25

Chris,
Thank you, couldn't have put it better.
200% agree.
Exactly what I was thinking. Last few weeks most of the posts were from or about this poster. Total waste of time, and irritating.
So, if it's not possible to ban him, I hope all posters will follow your recommendation:

"Perhaps it’s now time for every user on here to filter him & not engage his ego.

We can all post Pro_S2009 only posts misinformation periodically, to advise any new readers of his lack of credibility.

I strongly suggest we all do this & think that if no one engages him then he will stop posting in time."

GLA

[chris0805] 23/5/2022 07:12

I've largely had a weekend away from the PANR BB & social media channels other than a quick occasional look in. I have sketched quickly over the weekends posts but not fully read them. I personally have had Pro on filter many times, then frequently unfiltering him to respond to some of his comical claims and posts. Perhaps it's now time for every user on here to filter him & not engage his ego. We can all post Pro_S2009 only posts misinformation periodically, to advise any new readers of his lack of credibility.I strongly suggest we all do this & think that if no one engages him then he will stop posting in time. GLA C

[mojad5] 23/5/2022 06:29

Interesting article in oilprice.com illustrates how massively undervalued we are with our 23 billion barrels discovery:

'Bloomberg recently reported that three wells that Shell had drilled offshore Brazil had come up dry. The supermajor had paid $1 billion for drilling rights in the area and had spent three years drilling to come up empty-handed. Exxon had also failed to tap any significant oil reserves in its Brazilian blocks, which cost it $1.6 billion.'

[total return] 22/5/2022 22:56

Dusty, thank you for making a great point suggesting that the Peel Hunt MM may have gone short of Pantheon stock prior to the note which rings true.

[thedustyone] 22/5/2022 17:25

The constant and unbalanced negatives by PRO on here smacks of an agenda. Posting that note from Peel Hunt in bold tells you all that you need to know about his objective especially when the disclosures in the PH note confirm that;

"Peel Hunt makes a market in Pantheon"

the document is to be treated as a "marketing communication"

"has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of research"

and that "it is not subject to any prohibition on dealing ahead of the dissemination of investment research"

Pretty much sums up the reason for the note and you can almost guarantee that they went short ahead of the publication. Of course, not many will read the small print with the disclosure providing them with the get out of jail card. If anything, this should be seen as an opportunity to accumulate given the progress made over the last year by PANR.

DYOR

Dusty

[pannikin] 22/5/2022 15:12

Many people thinkSome people sayWhere have I heard that before? Oh yes, the big orange baby.When you have no valid arguments, no facts to backup your position, it is easier to fall back on the vagaries of "someone says"PRO is happy to invest/gamble on wildcats but cannot see any value in 2.3Gbbo of prospective resources. Or perhaps, as has been said many times, he doesn't actually believe what he says nor do his opinions reflect his tradesLooking forward to more nonsense tomorrow morning.

[neil9327b] 22/5/2022 14:53

If any large oil companies wanted to position themselves to bid for the company, it would be necessary for them to acquire a lot of shares in the company first. Since most holders in AIM stocks like Pantheon Resources are private investors, they have to do something to cajole some of them into selling. Wouldn't it make sense for them for someone to criticize the company repeatedly on social media to try to achieve this effect?

[forwood] 22/5/2022 14:50

Perhaps pro is really max cooper, determined to prove his oh so tedious point, that a down bet here can succeed. Note the timing of the attack, when nothing much is going on news wise to counter the drift. The repetitive nature of the posts designed to reinforce the doubts come straight out of the Goebbels school of propaganda. Well congrats Max / pro. You got it down a third from its high. But you can have too much of a 'good' thing. Repeating lies, half truths etc ad infinitum exposes the nature of the Emperor's New c!othes. There's nothing there other than a desire to impress the crowd. Well, the crowd sees you for what you are. A naked fool... Theyre already pelting you with brickbats. The bulls have so much more evidence. Perhaps you need to hear it again

[fordtin] 22/5/2022 14:41

April 2022 webinar
1hr 29m 40s

“... we intend to re-enter the Alkaid number one to test the Shelf Margin Deltaic. ..”




When Pantheon originally said they could produce from Alkaid #1, they had very little cash available.

Theta west lease application was still 'hush-hush'.

Pantheon has since raised sufficient funds to enable drilling Alkaid #2 in an optimal location for production.

Also, subsequent drilling has provided a considerable amount of new information allowing plans to be optimised.

Given the opportunity to drill Alkaid #2 to appraise the 0.9 billion barrel Alkaid reservoir in an optimal location instead of Alkaid #1’s distal location, thus allowing Alkaid #1 to be used to appraise the 2.6 billion barrel SMD reservoir in an optimal location, I’m happy with management’s choice.

[k1ngkonggb] 22/5/2022 14:24

Jeez....Prolapse is on fire this weekend....all I see is the filter sign.

How much have you earned with your diatribe.....be brave and go long on Panr!!!

[rabito79] 22/5/2022 14:13

Pro, slow down. Your haste to fire out points isn't supporting your argument. You can't produce from a well without having a year round access, and you can't get all year round access until you have a field development plan approved. Unless of course you are next to the Dalton/TAPS. Also remember pro Alkaid one was thought to have penetrated the distal position of Alkaid one, with the location picked due other issues relating to the tax if I recall correctly.This is pretty simple stuff Pro and I sure you can do better.

[bad gateway] 22/5/2022 14:12

It is a fair point. Very Zenith energy of them.

[pro_s2009] 22/5/2022 14:01

Alkaid #1 was hailed and "suspended as a future producer" and then, so far, they never bothered to go back to this "producer"........

Now it seems a new well Alkaid #2 is being drilled.

3 years with this "suspended producer".......3 years with zero production and zero reserves......... and now drilling a brand new Alkaid #2 ???????

What is going on ?

[pro_s2009] 22/5/2022 13:59

No, they are drilling a brand new Alkaid #2 well.

[rabito79] 22/5/2022 13:56

They plan on going back to it this winter Pro. Did you not watch the webinar?

[pro_s2009] 22/5/2022 13:51

Rabito.

Alkaid-1 was suspended as a "future producer". This is what PANR said.

Why did they never go back to it, and produce from it ?


"............ the wellbore has been successfully suspended and freeze protected for future production purposes............."

[madd_rip] 22/5/2022 13:47

I see pro is on full bs post meltdown today, shame he's posting to nothingness as he's filtered by so many. A sad, sad, lonely ramper, gazing into the abyss with his questionable investments in EME, TXP, 88e.

[rabito79] 22/5/2022 13:41

Why would the have a very quick blockage at SMD Pro and yet not at Alkaid, LBFF x 2 and SFS? Someone with any intelligence would put more thought into their apparent red flags, particularly given SMD has the best poro/perm data.The reasons for not getting SMD laterals carried out have been well documented. No point going though them again as you will just insinuate there is some unjustified conspiracy in the background. I am comfortable with them, if you choose to think differently that's up to you, although it's not the long ago you were comfortable with them too.

[pro_s2009] 22/5/2022 13:32

Modelling errors ? Reality very different from expectation ?

[pro_s2009] 22/5/2022 13:32

Rabito, someone with some intelligence would question why, when PANR had a clear plan to do a small horizontal at Talitha in 2021, they then did not do it.

Was their modelling wrong and after drilling they thought "whoops lets forget that the models are wrong"..... ?

They even did not do the small horizontal when they returned to Talitha in 2022.

[pro_s2009] 22/5/2022 13:28

Not really, how quickly the SMD at Talitha "blocked" is a potential big red flag imo.

There are lots of extrapolated figures around the AIM market. AIM companies get away with this, some unscrupulous ones will flow test for 30 minutes and then claim "flowed at up to rates of XXX bopd" in ther RNS........ but of course it never did flow for more than a few minutes.........but they give the impression of "days" with a bopd figure.

As I said, if only they had, in 2021, done what they said they would, and done a small horizontal at Talitha.

That they avoided doing it (did Great Bear in the past also promise small horizontals in 2012 onwards.....but never did ?) of course raises eyebrows.

[rabito79] 22/5/2022 13:26

Ah, okay so it's the whole scientific community you are questioning not just Pantheon. What's science done for us eh Pro.I will take it from your response you have no modelling to contradict that done by LKA et al. So more bluff and bluster.Makes me wonder what data you use for any of your tipped oil explorers. I mean it could all be wrong. Strange you were requesting a cCOS for the plays. I would imagine you need to science to work that out. Deary me Pro this is desperate stuff indeed, both funny and sad at the same time.

[neil9327b] 22/5/2022 13:16

So Pro is short for "Prose". The teller of tall tales it would seem.

[maxxy1] 22/5/2022 13:06

PROtard on full on ramping lol. Nonetheless entertaining on an easy Sunday. Hope you look after your mental breakdown after so many losses, or don't, who cares