Pantheon Resources Share Discussion Threads

[pcok] 25/5/2022 12:08

Do you have a link

[chris0805] 25/5/2022 12:07

It's well worth a visit to the shiny new Pro de ramper thread... there's a great post from Rabito79 that deserves an uptick from all sane posters;-)GLA C

[forwood] 25/5/2022 11:56

Sp getting more & more oversold. Thinking maybe a revisit of recent lows and then a bounce.

[hiddendepths] 25/5/2022 10:20

Good find BB!

[bodroll] 25/5/2022 09:50

Thanks for this BB. I am pleased to see someone posting this morning!

[yoghurt73] 25/5/2022 09:31

Do we know any of the downhole characteristics from that Conoco horizontal that they may have put in the public domain like API, perm & porosities?

[pannikin] 24/5/2022 17:13

PRO is funny, got to give him that.If he didn't have years of history on ADVFN showing his modus operandi you would be forgiven for thinking that he is not actually talking about himself when he discusses 'traders' actions.He is buying now, despite what he says. 'load up in safe times' and 'unload when the risky period approaches'. PRO, in case you look in ;) I have been adding significantly since the strong bounce from the 200d EMA. I doubt that I am the only one.. Don't be too slow with your buying!

[chris0805] 24/5/2022 15:05

They say talking to oneself is the first sign of madness... so no surprise there ;-)

[scot126] 24/5/2022 07:19

Dear All - I'm making up for lost time on Twitter, @scot126126

If it's good enough for the electric golf cart manufacturer and wannabe Martian, Elon Musk, then it's good enough for scot126!

Funny old website is Twitter. Everyone appears to get on famously with *all* the other tweeters! Plus, the tweets aren't nearly as lengthy as some of the ridiculously verbose posts on this forum. ;)

Just fyi.

[forwood] 23/5/2022 22:03

US ended day equal to £1.10.

[bit coin] 23/5/2022 16:37

Nice finish to the day!

[rideacockhorse] 23/5/2022 15:50

I don't know about Pro but his CLON tip is getting a right kicking.

[forwood] 23/5/2022 14:12

I assume those f'wits at peel chunt are using their ignorant sell note to short this. Cannacord & WHI should be coming out with buy notes to stuff them where it hurts.

[maxxy1] 23/5/2022 12:02

Lol. #PROtard is the new Ken Chung? Lemmings and mushrooms only ?

[trigger blade] 23/5/2022 11:54

He claims to be living rent-free in people’s heads, but it’s more likely that PANR is living rent-free in his head, otherwise he wouldn’t feel the need to set up his own thread for a share he doesn’t own.

[madd_rip] 23/5/2022 11:28

You couldn't make it up, a new board has been set up by he who shall not be named as an echo chamber for his misinformation, and has blocked anyone who disagrees with his malfeasance

[rabito79] 23/5/2022 11:27

Personally I think we should try to answer Pro's points so false narratives don't take hold. Note someone thought his point about not revisiting Alkaid made sense when in reality his latest mud sling was easily answered given local legislationNow his latest narrative is the wells should not decline significantly for the first three months. It would be foolish for us to accept this as the company have modelled the decline curves and this has been reflected in their commercialisation considerations. These are not offshore wells and we should not treat them as such. The model is very different to what most people are used to, however that doesn't mean the can't be highly lucrative. Indeed slide 10 of last week's presentation show a decline of 300-400bbls in the first 5 months. This relates to ngms's repeated statements about poor reservoir quality. As demonstrated in last Monday's webinar the company are fully aware of the impacts of porosity and permeability, they have been working this for over 10 years! Most of Peel Hunt's points relate to this as well. Of course when you answer these points Pro will open up his questioning beyond Pantheon into science in general. That's when you know he is talking rubbish.

[officerdigby] 23/5/2022 11:00

Well I'm with the hanging about it did sound like a long time. And subsequent chemical reaction theory. However, I was interested in the rate of recovery of frack fluids.You see Pro your argument doesn't stand up. The frack fluids were pushed out by the reservoir pressure so the faster they came out the more pressure. Unlikely to close therefore through lack of pressure! I'm just wondering if one of those experts that read this thread care to comment..? There was new info in the last interview I thought.

[madd_rip] 23/5/2022 10:55

I would hazard a guess that they didn't envisage the fluid being there for a few days, could that be the reason/result?