We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nanoco Group Plc | LSE:NANO | London | Ordinary Share | GB00B01JLR99 | ORD 10P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
-0.51 | -2.55% | 19.50 | 19.50 | 20.15 | 19.92 | 19.50 | 19.50 | 1,311,544 | 15:58:32 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Coml Physical, Biologcl Resh | 5.62M | 11.09M | 0.0343 | 5.69 | 63.06M |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
05/9/2017 01:10 | Yes fortunately QMC isnt near their all time lows..thats the big difference..good luck ..signing out. | ih_169538 | |
05/9/2017 00:29 | Thanks. I genuinely hope you found my post useful - I noted your identification of the falling price here which I'm sure many missed, and thought you'd find it enlightening to note the parallels with the recent QMC price movement.For some post rationalisation explaining the reasons behind the QMC price fall I suggest you spend more time on the QMC board - the sellers can explain the merit behind their decision. Best wishes. | wigwammer | |
05/9/2017 00:18 | Good luck then with your investment.Keep topping up ( averaging diwn )if you believe in management and their plans moving forward.Those OEMs wanting high quality cfqd will ultimatley decide where they get it from.For years I was told Nanoco was the leader on our forum but that has completely dried up..even the inbox messages to me dripping with sarcasm has gone from a stream to a trickle. | ih_169538 | |
05/9/2017 00:07 | Crunch - you miss the point.To repeat. In May, you told me QMC was interesting at 14. You probably thought it was low at 13, 12, 9.. I'm sure many QMC holders thought that as they topped up.Well they were all wrong.Perhaps it's best you spend more time on the QMC board convincing holders of its "merits" with some choice "facts" - because it appears many of the faithful are happy to dump it at this time. | wigwammer | |
04/9/2017 23:43 | This forum is for discussion on Nanoco shares, nothing to do with QMC. I would think anyone invested in Nanoco is aware of the competition and can do their own research and make up their own minds on which company they wish to invest in. None of the publicly traded QD companies share prices are exactly doing well at present. It's still very early in the day to say who will be the biggest winner. You pays your money and takes your choice. | andycapped | |
04/9/2017 23:19 | The difference is I never promote topping up at anytime.I am an early investor with an average well below QMCs share price as of today.The other difference is the touting of Nanos superiority by some here when clearly thats not the case.The way Nanos share price has reacted is soley based on merit.How many guidelines missed and how many excuses can be made before you see the light.I have zero joy in seeing others loose their hard earned money but when they are plain ignorant its deserved.The writing was on the wall this was going to happen..cash call coming..still commercializing?? Why would you state that if you already can ? Lots of stuff doesn't add up.If you want to see it through thats your choice..but at some time you have to admit the facts posted are just that..facts. | ih_169538 | |
04/9/2017 22:54 | "And what is that low price TRT you are buying in at ? Perhaps you thought it was low at 39 P 29P 25 P ..many here thought that as they topped up.."In May, crunch told me QMC was interesting at 14. He probably thought it was low at 13, 12, 9.. I'm sure many QMC holders thought that as they topped up.Well they were all wrong.Hope you find that extremely helpful and good luck everyone. | wigwammer | |
04/9/2017 22:38 | hxxp://www.satprnews | mrplay | |
04/9/2017 22:06 | In for the long game. I do my own research don't rely on folk deramping without any evidence as justification. The company has said nothing so no change since their last report. I take advantage therefore of folk on here deramping. It has made me lots of money in the past. Thanks again slippery our plan is working. | trt | |
04/9/2017 19:10 | and they are listed on the main market, aren't there certain standards to be met regarding keeping investors up to date? | davemac3 | |
04/9/2017 19:03 | It is all supposition. the company point blank refuses to quantify anything, be it real or anticipated sales. they hide behind the cloak of nda's. they must receive feedback from end users of the potential demand, otherwise how would they plan ahead. They treat the holders with contempt, whilst continuing to pay themselves target bonuses and salaries out of proportion to their achievements. | notimpressed | |
04/9/2017 18:39 | And what is that low price TRT you are buying in at ? Perhaps you thought it was low at 39 P 29P 25 P ..many here thought that as they " topped up "..Self admittedly ME did state that restructuring would happen if sales didn't transpire soon and their last PR put that out there stating Cad free sales were slower than anticipated "The company said cadmium-free quantum dot technology adoption continues to be "slow" and said protracted regulatory change to restrict the use of cadmium is "unhelpful". The one thing many missed was the comment about making "progress " on commercializing their CFQds..???Still not there ...making progress means exactly that.If they havent figured it out then there is a big problem.If you cant mass produce and make it cheap then you will be a niche business or gone soon.I see Nano as a take out target for their IP now instead of a QD supplier. "The sustainable nano-technology developer said it continues to make "solid progress" in the commercialisation of its cadmium-free quantum dots, adding that while the market is developing "more slowly than originally anticipated", it remains focused on the management of costs ahead of its anticipated sales ramp-up. | ih_169538 | |
04/9/2017 18:16 | It is not maximum pessimism yet as we still have sellers. Part of the problem here is that it is very difficult to gauge the true value of the company as much revolves around the value of the IP. It could be anything between £25 million and £180 million. | petepitstop | |
04/9/2017 17:29 | Someone is buying them, else there'd be no sales. | andycapped | |
04/9/2017 17:28 | Only when a company has cash and sales. | slipperysidewinder | |
04/9/2017 17:19 | This all sounds like capitulation. Isn't that the optimal time to buy? | tonsil | |
04/9/2017 15:21 | trt, no news, do you think if they had booked £5 million of sales they would not publish it. the share price is plummeting because the pro's have been given the heads up there are no sales, and are unloading faster than an elephant with diarrhea | notimpressed | |
04/9/2017 15:13 | No news so nothing has changed. Carry on being negative it helps me and others buy in at a low price and maximises my profit on the rise. | trt | |
04/9/2017 15:04 | Slippy, if you believe that is the case, I assume you have re-opened a short position? | sd_anon | |
04/9/2017 14:41 | trt "Nothing scary if you're a long term investor". You have to be kidding right? The very survival of the company and the viabilty of its product offering is at stake here. | slipperysidewinder | |
04/9/2017 14:30 | probably not, as nano never bother to give an informative reply.. | jfacwc | |
04/9/2017 14:17 | has anyone bothered contacting nano to ask wtf is going on? | notimpressed |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions