ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for charts Register for streaming realtime charts, analysis tools, and prices.

NANO Nanoco Group Plc

19.50
-0.51 (-2.55%)
26 Apr 2024 - Closed
Delayed by 15 minutes
Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Nanoco Group Plc LSE:NANO London Ordinary Share GB00B01JLR99 ORD 10P
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  -0.51 -2.55% 19.50 19.50 20.15 19.92 19.50 19.50 1,311,544 15:58:32
Industry Sector Turnover Profit EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap
Coml Physical, Biologcl Resh 5.62M 11.09M 0.0343 5.69 63.06M
Nanoco Group Plc is listed in the Coml Physical, Biologcl Resh sector of the London Stock Exchange with ticker NANO. The last closing price for Nanoco was 20.01p. Over the last year, Nanoco shares have traded in a share price range of 15.50p to 23.55p.

Nanoco currently has 323,380,668 shares in issue. The market capitalisation of Nanoco is £63.06 million. Nanoco has a price to earnings ratio (PE ratio) of 5.69.

Nanoco Share Discussion Threads

Showing 29901 to 29922 of 55050 messages
Chat Pages: Latest  1206  1205  1204  1203  1202  1201  1200  1199  1198  1197  1196  1195  Older
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
05/9/2017
01:10
Yes fortunately QMC isnt near their all time lows..thats the big difference..good luck ..signing out.
ih_169538
05/9/2017
00:29
Thanks. I genuinely hope you found my post useful - I noted your identification of the falling price here which I'm sure many missed, and thought you'd find it enlightening to note the parallels with the recent QMC price movement.For some post rationalisation explaining the reasons behind the QMC price fall I suggest you spend more time on the QMC board - the sellers can explain the merit behind their decision. Best wishes.
wigwammer
05/9/2017
00:18
Good luck then with your investment.Keep topping up ( averaging diwn )if you believe in management and their plans moving forward.Those OEMs wanting high quality cfqd will ultimatley decide where they get it from.For years I was told Nanoco was the leader on our forum but that has completely dried up..even the inbox messages to me dripping with sarcasm has gone from a stream to a trickle.
ih_169538
05/9/2017
00:07
Crunch - you miss the point.To repeat. In May, you told me QMC was interesting at 14. You probably thought it was low at 13, 12, 9.. I'm sure many QMC holders thought that as they topped up.Well they were all wrong.Perhaps it's best you spend more time on the QMC board convincing holders of its "merits" with some choice "facts" - because it appears many of the faithful are happy to dump it at this time.
wigwammer
04/9/2017
23:43
This forum is for discussion on Nanoco shares, nothing to do with QMC. I would think anyone invested in Nanoco is aware of the competition and can do their own research and make up their own minds on which company they wish to invest in. None of the publicly traded QD companies share prices are exactly doing well at present. It's still very early in the day to say who will be the biggest winner.

You pays your money and takes your choice.

andycapped
04/9/2017
23:19
The difference is I never promote topping up at anytime.I am an early investor with an average well below QMCs share price as of today.The other difference is the touting of Nanos superiority by some here when clearly thats not the case.The way Nanos share price has reacted is soley based on merit.How many guidelines missed and how many excuses can be made before you see the light.I have zero joy in seeing others loose their hard earned money but when they are plain ignorant its deserved.The writing was on the wall this was going to happen..cash call coming..still commercializing?? Why would you state that if you already can ? Lots of stuff doesn't add up.If you want to see it through thats your choice..but at some time you have to admit the facts posted are just that..facts.
ih_169538
04/9/2017
22:54
"And what is that low price TRT you are buying in at ? Perhaps you thought it was low at 39 P 29P 25 P ..many here thought that as they topped up.."In May, crunch told me QMC was interesting at 14. He probably thought it was low at 13, 12, 9.. I'm sure many QMC holders thought that as they topped up.Well they were all wrong.Hope you find that extremely helpful and good luck everyone.
wigwammer
04/9/2017
22:38
hxxp://www.satprnews.com/2017/09/04/quantum-dots-market-outlook-to-2025-altair-nanotechnologies-lg-display-nexxus-lighting-nanoco-technologies-qd-vision/
mrplay
04/9/2017
22:06
In for the long game. I do my own research don't rely on folk deramping without any evidence as justification. The company has said nothing so no change since their last report. I take advantage therefore of folk on here deramping. It has made me lots of money in the past. Thanks again slippery our plan is working.
trt
04/9/2017
19:10
and they are listed on the main market, aren't there certain standards to be met regarding keeping investors up to date?
davemac3
04/9/2017
19:03
It is all supposition. the company point blank refuses to quantify
anything, be it real or anticipated sales. they hide behind
the cloak of nda's. they must receive feedback from end users of
the potential demand, otherwise how would they plan ahead.
They treat the holders with contempt, whilst continuing to
pay themselves target bonuses and salaries out of proportion
to their achievements.

notimpressed
04/9/2017
18:39
And what is that low price TRT you are buying in at ? Perhaps you thought it was low at 39 P 29P 25 P ..many here thought that as they " topped up "..Self admittedly ME did state that restructuring would happen if sales didn't transpire soon and their last PR put that out there stating Cad free sales were slower than anticipated

"The company said cadmium-free quantum dot technology adoption continues to be "slow" and said protracted regulatory change to restrict the use of cadmium is "unhelpful".

The one thing many missed was the comment about making "progress " on commercializing their CFQds..???Still not there ...making progress means exactly that.If they havent figured it out then there is a big problem.If you cant mass produce and make it cheap then you will be a niche business or gone soon.I see Nano as a take out target for their IP now instead of a QD supplier.

"The sustainable nano-technology developer said it continues to make "solid progress" in the commercialisation of its cadmium-free quantum dots, adding that while the market is developing "more slowly than originally anticipated", it remains focused on the management of costs ahead of its anticipated sales ramp-up.

ih_169538
04/9/2017
18:16
It is not maximum pessimism yet as we still have sellers. Part of the problem here is that it is very difficult to gauge the true value of the company as much revolves around the value of the IP. It could be anything between £25 million and £180 million.
petepitstop
04/9/2017
17:29
Someone is buying them, else there'd be no sales.
andycapped
04/9/2017
17:28
Only when a company has cash and sales.
slipperysidewinder
04/9/2017
17:19
This all sounds like capitulation. Isn't that the optimal time to buy?
tonsil
04/9/2017
15:21
trt, no news, do you think if they had booked £5 million of sales
they would not publish it. the share price is plummeting because the pro's
have been given the heads up there are no sales, and are unloading faster
than an elephant with diarrhea

notimpressed
04/9/2017
15:13
No news so nothing has changed. Carry on being negative it helps me and others buy in at a low price and maximises my profit on the rise.
trt
04/9/2017
15:04
Slippy, if you believe that is the case, I assume you have re-opened a short position?
sd_anon
04/9/2017
14:41
trt

"Nothing scary if you're a long term investor".


You have to be kidding right?

The very survival of the company and the viabilty of its product offering is at stake here.

slipperysidewinder
04/9/2017
14:30
probably not, as nano never bother to give an informative reply..
jfacwc
04/9/2017
14:17
has anyone bothered contacting nano to ask wtf is going on?
notimpressed
Chat Pages: Latest  1206  1205  1204  1203  1202  1201  1200  1199  1198  1197  1196  1195  Older

Your Recent History

Delayed Upgrade Clock