We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Lloyds Banking Group Plc | LSE:LLOY | London | Ordinary Share | GB0008706128 | ORD 10P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
-0.10 | -0.18% | 54.20 | 54.14 | 54.16 | 54.32 | 53.36 | 53.86 | 341,475,029 | 16:35:19 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Commercial Banks, Nec | 23.74B | 5.46B | 0.0901 | 6.01 | 32.91B |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
30/8/2024 08:07 | Its not about economics careful - as you well expound - and it never really was. Its about one group of people like kk who clearly dislikes smoking and the couple previously described by tricky in Buxton wishing to impose what they believe to be their superior views on everyone else. Its very similar to the Remain/Leave interminable discussion. IMO its one of our societies main problems of our age. One group believing they are right - no discussion, no debate end of - similar to the no platforming nonsense at universities making democracy defunct. | scruff1 | |
30/8/2024 08:06 | It seems to me that smoking has not been handled well by the Government. Instead of totally banning smoking indoors in public establishments, it would make more sense to segregate completely smokers and non smokers in public establishments such as pubs, restaurants, club's, cinema's etc by licensing a certain percentage of these to allow smoking inside. Smokers would go to establishments where it was permitted, and non smokers would go to establishments where it was not permitted. Problem solved, everyone has the freedom of choice which type to go to, smoking or non smoking. Everyone is happy. | hardup1 | |
30/8/2024 07:50 | diku always amazes me these people coming out of some pretty awful situations have got the money to pay the gangs. It amazes me even more those that do manage it are used as an excuse for why our houses are more expensive than they should be. THEY HAVE NO MONEY! | aceuk | |
30/8/2024 07:45 | You must understand the numbers. If the cost to the NHS was the only important factor then you must understand that if everyone stopped smoking and there were no premature deaths, people living longer, it would cripple the country and its finances. The financial plusses are; The tax on cigarettes People living shorter lives. If everyone died 10 years earlier we would be a very rich country. Old retired people cost a fortune in many ways. Non smokers when they are old get expensive treatment for other conditions over a longer period. The financial cost of smoking is the cost of treatment at the end of their short lives. So the economic argument made for stopping smoking is wrong. | careful | |
30/8/2024 07:37 | If these migrants coming via boats are paying say $3000 to people smugglers to cross the channel as reporters have mentioned how about they are made to pay say $3000 non refundable to UK to cover coast guard services expenses and for processing the application, accommodation etc etc...it might just deter others from coming via this dangerous route... | diku | |
30/8/2024 07:36 | Very telling that Nasal Starmer felt so intimidated by Maggie's picture that he had to remove it - couldn't have her powerful presence reminding him every day of his own relative weakness and insignificance, which he is currently trying to mask by shutting the main-stream, thinking majority down and attempting to control even the simplest pleasures in their lives. Where will it end? Badly for him and his comrades, in my view, right from the very first by-election. Just a question of how much societal, political and economic damage he does in the meantime. | senden11 | |
30/8/2024 07:20 | diku we wont lower the boat count until we leave the ECHR. As long as we are part of the ECHR, the illegals have a lifeline and will continue to come. 2TK has absolutely zero interest to leave that, so the boats will continue its as simple as that | rackersthedon | |
30/8/2024 07:18 | Scruff.You do utter total nonsense at times and when it comes to smoking this is certainly one of those times. I am a conservative supporter but on this one issue I would support any measure that limits smoking. It is a filthy habit that benefits nobody. I would also be happy to contribute more in tax as a consequence if it means we have a health service that actually works and is not having to waste time treating idiots who are hell bent on suicide. | kkclimber56 | |
30/8/2024 07:16 | They keep coming...how do they source these dinghies... 525 in 8 boats 28 Aug... 614 in 10 boats 29 Aug... | diku | |
30/8/2024 07:16 | If they're going to ban cigarettes they need to ban kids breakfast cereals aswell. Cereals contain corn starch which spikes insulin levels raising hunger levels and obesity. | utrickytrees | |
30/8/2024 07:03 | I accept tax would have to rise to cover the shortfall. Its the price we have to pay to rid society of this filthy habit. A bit like the tax we have to pay to protect the country | kkclimber56 | |
30/8/2024 05:25 | thumbs up hardup1, not one mention of that on the news at all. money! | hellscream | |
30/8/2024 04:23 | Banning smoking sounds like a good idea, but would result in a net loss of approximately £10bn revenue annually for the treasury. Smoking related illness costs the NHS around £2.5bn annually. Including VAT, total tobacco revenue for the treasury is around £12.3bn annually. So they would have to raise taxes more elsewhere or introduce new taxes to make up this £10bn shortfall to the treasury. | hardup1 | |
29/8/2024 21:46 | You are wro g on this one.We dont allow people to drive at 100mph because it is in nobodies interest to do so and the greater good trumps the the desires of those deluded individuals who are stupid enough to think that yhey have a right to drive at 100mph.Same with smoking. Those who believe it is their right need protecting from themselves. | kkclimber56 | |
29/8/2024 20:44 | Ukrainian Army Threatened With New Strategic Retreat Support SouthFront Massive Russian strikes in Ukrainian rear regions do not stop for several days in a row. On the night of August 29, another combined attack of Russian drones and missiles targeted Ukrainian military and industrial infrastructure in a dozen cities throughout the country, including in the capital. The Ukrainian military in the border Sumy and Kharkiv regions are pounded by Russian bombs. At night, the Kyiv region came under a massive attack. Russian strikes were reported in the village of Obukhov, located on the outskirts of the capital. The second attack in a week targeted Borispil airport used by the Armed Forces of Ukraine. Precious military cargo from NATO is stored there, including equipment necessary for the repair and restoration of NATO military equipment, as well as weapons and ammunition supplied by Kyiv’s Western “partners&rdqu In their turn, the Armed Forces of Ukraine attempted new attacks in the Russian rear regions. This time, the Crimean peninsula became one of the targets. According to the Russian Ministry of Defense, at night Russian air defense forces destroyed 6 Ukrainian unmanned vehicles in the border Bryansk, Belgorod regions and the Republic of Crimea. Three Ukrainian unmanned boats were destroyed in the Black Sea near Sevastopol. Meanwhile, the standoff continues in the Russian Kursk region. The Ukrainian military is banging its head against the wall of the Russian defenses. Ukrainian motorized groups are launching assault in different directions around Sudzha, as a result, their losses grow but the frontlines remain unchanged. According to available footage, Russian forces began launching their upgraded FAB-3000 heavy bombs on the Ukrainian military positions on the Russian territory. Such devastating strikes result in heavy damage to the local infrastructure but they leave no chance to the Ukrainian military to save its reserves. While Ukrainian forces are ground in the north, the Russian army is swiftly advancing in the Donbass. Ukrainian defense was ruined on a wide front in the Pokrovsk direction, Ukrainian are fleeing from their strongholds to the west. The Russian army is already approaching the center of Selidovo, one of the largest settlements in the area. Russian forces took control of a strategically important stronghold on the height on the outskirts and force the enemy to retreat from a wide area. Demoralized Ukrainian servicemen are offering only weak resistance. The goal of Russian offensive is to reach the line of Pokrovsk-Selidovo-Ku At the same time, Russian forces achieved new victory in the Ugledar direction. Large Ukrainian stronghold in the town of Konstantinovka came under Russian control. The mop up operations continue in the settlement, while Russian advance along the road forces Ukrainian units to retreat from Pavlovka. The strategic threat to the Ukrainian army is growing. Support SouthFront | stonedyou | |
29/8/2024 19:05 | Emily P fought to get women to have the right to vote. She must be crying. The whole point of a vote was that the proposals of the various parties would enable ppl to choose. Democracy? Maybe Seems the outcome of a vote is not so. Sorry kneel we voted to leave - how dare you - just u u tool try to change the arrangements. The blame game is a farce. Ever since cyclops engineered the Office for Budget Responsibility there was always a watching eye. £20m black hole - bs. Put it in the public domain and millions believe it! Sadly Harry ginge soon to be bald gave countless the excuse not to work - health issues. And tories screwed our natural energy resources - chunt the prat. What might have been will never be with millions in boats let in. The cost humungous - just screw the old says the pathetic croak of a PM. | jl5006 | |
29/8/2024 18:15 | HardupThanks, I'll track it down tomorrow.Tbh I get very lost in the RNS world but now I know where and when to look.Ttfn | donkeygphone |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions