Lloyds Banking Share Discussion Threads

[pierre oreilly] 11/7/2024 13:40

Are the extremelu
y useful buyback stats still being published somewhere?

[institutional investments] 11/7/2024 13:26

Sorry, we dont give maps via pokes haha

[thanatos abysss] 11/7/2024 13:24

cricket ghoing on well like BT

[institutional investments] 11/7/2024 13:24

You need a strong finish. Tis all il say, investors

[institutional investments] 11/7/2024 13:22

Not good at all

[jordaggy] 11/7/2024 12:41

I think he's saying we're too good for this thread H1.

[hardup1] 11/7/2024 12:08

tricky, correct, I was only responding to a post that was made by jordy on this thread.

[utrickytrees] 11/7/2024 11:44

JD/ Hardup, your on the wrong thread lads.

[jordaggy] 11/7/2024 10:38

H1 2 - 1 Jordaggy

[hardup1] 11/7/2024 10:36

jordaggy.....The FT link I posted comes up as a paywall if you click on it. So if you google "goldman sachs fail stress test" and then click on the FT link that comes up and it will open.

And here is a link to an article from fortune.com.......

"Goldman Sachs passed a recent Federal Reserve stress test, though it was harder hit than the other 30 banks tested, according to Bank of ..."

"The Federal Reserve on Wednesday released the results of its annual stress test to see how America’s 31 largest banks would fare in a financial crisis. While the hypothetical recession showed that all banks were well protected against an actual recession, they fared worse on average than in last year’s test.

According to a Bank of America report out Thursday, the “worst hit” was Goldman Sachs, with a year-over-year increase of roughly 100 basis points in its stress capital buffer. Bank of America’s analysts said this implies Goldman is exceeding the minimum requirement for globally important banks by approximately 60 basis points, meaning the firm has less excess capital compared with similarly sized peers. Columbus-based Huntington Bank and New York–based Citigroup were among the best-performing."

[jordaggy] 11/7/2024 10:23

H1 1 1 Jordaggy

[hardup1] 11/7/2024 10:08

jordaggy post 395720......"there's a FT article as well."

Yes there is, and in this article it states that Goldman Sachs passed the latest FED Test.

"Goldman, like other large US banks, passed the Fed’s annual financial fitness test. But the test predicted Goldman would lose more than $40bn in a severe economic downturn, or nearly half the capital that regulators required it to have to cover losses last year, a worse result than any of its large rivals."

It seems most (not all) of the MSM are twisting the story reporting "Goldman Sachs failed the latest FED Stress Test".

FT Link to the full article which is not a paywall....

[optomistic] 11/7/2024 09:21

Doing OK with the divi gbh2....a little bit more would always be welcome though :-)))

[gbh2] 11/7/2024 09:17

Looking forward to results and info on dividend :)

[diku] 11/7/2024 08:47

Post 395720...5.3%???...no wonder the market action is diverted amongst the mag 7...just over 3 months ago Apple market cap was $2.65 trillion...yesterday Apple market cap $3.57 trillion...market action is skewed and distorted...traders paradise...




Given the clear conflict by the Fed staff in Washington, the stress test results for GS are rather alarming. This is the test result for Goldman that the Fed assigned after the private consultations and hand-holding with Board staff? Notice that GS ended the stress test with a Tier 1 Leverage Ratio of 5.3%.

[xxxxxy] 11/7/2024 08:38

This week saw the launch of what is likely to be the most popular political show on the UK Internet – "Outspoken Live", with former GB News presenter Dan Wootton. With over half a million followers on X (formerly Twitter), it is hardly surprising that in just two days his new YouTube channel surpassed 100,000 subscribers. For those who don't know, this is an astonishing number of people prepared to tune in every weekday at 5pm.The Facts4EU.Org team were delighted to be invited to be the lead act on Dan's second show. Readers can watch this below. Our segment starts at 9mins 10 sec and lasts 27 minutes....facts4eu

[utrickytrees] 11/7/2024 08:01

Stans plan seems to amount to spending £300 on England opponent shirts and then bagging them up for charity on Monday morning lol.

[utrickytrees] 11/7/2024 07:56

As far as I'm aware, no England players have whiney nasally voices Stan.

[geckotheglorious] 11/7/2024 06:43

So what is idle unsubstantiated speculation

jordaggy
Post 395713
It's worth bearing in mind, GS failed their stress test 2 days ago! are banks heading for trouble?




And what is Indisputable FACT backed by evidence

hardup1
Post 395714
jordaggy, it's worth bearing in mind that GS did not fail their stress test, and the test was not 2 days ago, it was in June. All the Banks tested passed the test.

Page 7 of the FED Report:

"Executive Summary
The 2024 stress test shows that the 31 large banks subject to the test this year have sufficient capital to absorb nearly $685 billion in losses and continue lending to households and businesses under stressful conditions. In the immediate years after the 2007–09 Global Financial Crisis, banks subject to the stress test substantially increased their capital, which has remained largely level for the past few years."




You can do better Jordaggy.

[geckotheglorious] 11/7/2024 06:42

hardup1
Post 395707
That dubious England penalty was poetic justice on the Netherlands manager Koeman for his cheating in a 1993 World Cup qualifier against England when he cynically pulled down David Platt when he was through with just the keeper to beat and never got sent off, and minutes later scored the winner from a free kick! That knocked England out from qualifying for the 1994 World Cup!

Watched my first highlights as England vs Holland is usually a belter.

Ah Ronald Koeman, I remember him - the guy with the rocket kick a la Hot Shot Hamish!!

Nasty piece of work, a cheat as you say, so poetic indeed.

Cant say I thought it was a penalty though - Kane made a meal of it (especially as he'd kicked the ball first,and missed), before contact...

[hardup1] 11/7/2024 06:01

jordaggy, it's worth bearing in mind that GS did not fail their stress test, and the test was not 2 days ago, it was in June. All the Banks tested passed the test.

Page 7 of the FED Report:

"Executive Summary
The 2024 stress test shows that the 31 large banks subject to the test this year have sufficient capital to absorb nearly $685 billion in losses and continue lending to households and businesses under stressful conditions. In the immediate years after the 2007–09 Global Financial Crisis, banks subject to the stress test substantially increased their capital, which has remained largely level for the past few years."

[jordaggy] 11/7/2024 03:02

It's worth bearing in mind, GS failed their stress test 2 days ago! are banks heading for trouble?