Lloyds Banking Share Discussion Threads

[k38] 01/11/2019 11:51

In this election no one will be able to have a majority to govern. This election is about who come first and the alliance to form government. Labour already has agree with SNP by promising them a second Scottish referendum Boris must wake up and face reality or find himself and conservatives out of power overnight.

[bbalanjones] 01/11/2019 11:46

k38 - you should become one of his advisors!

[k38] 01/11/2019 11:45

Boris has no chance for majority and he will risk even losing the first place in this race to either party, labour or lib dems.

[bbalanjones] 01/11/2019 11:42

Boris is not stupid - he knows such an alliance would end his hopes.

Boris is a crafty mind-changer always on the lookout for himself.

Quite like his erstwhile mentor, Trump in fact.

[k38] 01/11/2019 11:36

Boris would be stupid to refuse the Brexit party support and DUP allies.

[k38] 01/11/2019 11:31

Farage is a very clever politician.

[k38] 01/11/2019 11:27

and the latest mobile phone...;))

[pal44] 01/11/2019 11:26

These days poverty means not having a big widescreen flat tv I think

[maxk] 01/11/2019 11:24

Farage is clear.

Boris's deal is not brexit. We wont be able to do our own deals, control our borders, fish our own fish etc, the list goes on, and on, and on.

Corby is even worse.

Dim/Libs position is simply simply ridiculous.



You know what to do.

[bbalanjones] 01/11/2019 11:21

Farage? One of the many foul smells emanating from a Trump.

[ladeside] 01/11/2019 11:20

He told the BBC that the new retail environment, where the working practices of some online retailers were "almost Victorian", had made life extremely competitive for traditional firms.

"All legacy retailers - and Asda are one - have some legacy arrangements with their workforce which simply don't reflect the modern world that we're in.

"Many online retailers don't pay their workers anywhere near as well as the mainstream retailers," he said.

To compete, it was necessary to take tough decisions. "Sometimes you have to do the right thing for the whole business."

RACE TO THE BOTTOM CONFIRMED
IF YOU CAN'T BEAT THEM, JOIN THEM
BACK TO VICTORIAN TIMES WE GO, BY HIS OWN ADMISSION !!!

[k38] 01/11/2019 11:19

Very bad coverage from BBC, nothing like the coverage of the labour launch

[k38] 01/11/2019 11:17

Farage speaks now and already positive reaction from Lloyds share price..;))

[minerve 2] 01/11/2019 11:14

Folks, leave it to the experts, please.

You idiots would disagree with a brain surgeon in the theatre whilst he/she operates on you, or with yourselves in a telephone box.

Many issues look relatively simple from the outside which invites comment and opinion and also makes it easy to do so. In reality, the situations are generally much more complex and have more stakeholders than you realise, which means you should respect their qualified opinion and not pretend you know better, because you don't!

[enormouswillie] 01/11/2019 11:12

He MUST be lying in a ditch, surely!!!?

[hernando2] 01/11/2019 11:05

The question on a relative measure is to what /whom.

I am poverty stricken next to say Boris or Diane Abbott but rich as croesus compared to the guy begging up the high street.

many of the charities and workers in this field , make comparisons that are not helpful..IMO

We all can be poor or weathly dependant upon the prism you look through and measure against.

[grahamite2] 01/11/2019 11:05

Who do you trust on the definition of poverty?

A plethora of charities and experts who would be out of a job if they couldn't redefine poverty to include people who are not poor

OR

Grahamite: the voice of reason.

[minerve 2] 01/11/2019 11:00

Who do you trust on the definition of poverty?

A plethora of charities and experts who have worked in the field all their lives and experienced poverty first hand;

OR

Grahamite: the two-bit armchair landlord who thinks three meals a day is good enough.


You decide!

LOL

[cheshire pete] 01/11/2019 11:00

Observing tenants over the years when I had reason to attend, there seemed to be an inverse relationship between their wealth/disposable income and the size of the TV screen in the front room. Sure there must be some reasoning behind it.

[bbalanjones] 01/11/2019 10:57

Mr.e it ill becomes you to poke sarcasm at a fellow retiree from HE. LOL.

[grahamite2] 01/11/2019 10:56

LADESIDE, it's not about what I believe, it's about the absurd definition used by the Rowntree Trust. That definition includes the genuinely poor that you mention but it also includes a lot of people who are not poor by any reasonable standards. mr.elbee is right on this.