Lloyds Banking Share Discussion Threads

[xxxxxy] 27/3/2019 14:26

Coming May Elections.

Vote BREXIT Party.

The Conservative and Labour Party is a Party of QUISLINGS

[xxxxxy] 27/3/2019 14:24

Nigel Farage
@Nigel_Farage

Do the EU want the UK to contest the European elections and send back more eurosceptic MEPs? Do they really want to see my return?

Reject Article 50 extension, get Britain out and we can all get on with the rest of our lives

[bbalanjones] 27/3/2019 14:24

k38; the 'will of the 'People' in 1975 was otherwise. Just a whim of the past. Who knows what the future will hold?

[k38] 27/3/2019 14:21

5xy: That was in 2016: What about NOW?And the results are ignored, what about that... this is what you call democracy? Ignoring the will of the people is not democracy but dictatorship.

[bbalanjones] 27/3/2019 14:20

5xy: Have you been re-reading Orwells 1984? (or perhaps just too much cheese/)

[xxxxxy] 27/3/2019 14:19

Newport election

Vote Ukip

Labour have shown themselves as QUISLINGS

[xxxxxy] 27/3/2019 14:17

The EUSSR is a Futuristic Nightmare where Freedom is an illusion and Democracy is some dirty distorted figleaf.

LEAVE and WTO

[bbalanjones] 27/3/2019 14:17

5xy: That was in 2016: What about NOW?

[bbalanjones] 27/3/2019 14:16

Hoc: Valerie Vaz, Shadow Leader of the House. Makes a lot of sense!! Sam Giyima too.

[xxxxxy] 27/3/2019 14:14

17 million voted to LEAVE

LEAVE and WTO

[bbalanjones] 27/3/2019 14:11

g2: Limits were an inevitable future implication of 'driverless' motoring. Safety is a supreme consideration. Time will tell where that limit is set.

[bbalanjones] 27/3/2019 14:08

k38: just smell the coffee. Very beguiling when you consider all the statistical validation that is amassing.

[grahamite2] 27/3/2019 14:06

Unusual to find Minerva and k38 in agreement - and both right.

The new speed limiting rules are dangerous. Even if you drive like a little old lady there are times when a burst of power is vital, for instance in certain overtaking situations.

At the same time the EU is proposing severe censorship on the internet.

Are they actually trying to make themselves look bad?

[k38] 27/3/2019 14:04

Maybe the views change over time but facts are thesame in this case nothing has change.. the 6 millions are part of the 16 millions who vote to stay.



The petition means nothing especially if is a corrupt petition.

[bbalanjones] 27/3/2019 13:57

gbh2: Broadband development over the last 25+ years has been truly piecemeal! Thanks for your info.

[gbh2] 27/3/2019 13:51

bbalanjones, No Virgin fibre connection in our area.

[bbalanjones] 27/3/2019 13:51

HoC: Usual, expected, distain from JR-M. Could this twit be a future PM?

[bbalanjones] 27/3/2019 13:48

k38: Politics changes, like views, over time. Yesterday is 'history' today is the starting point of the future.

[bbalanjones] 27/3/2019 13:41

stoned: Very pertinent and cogent post, Thanks. (I thought that I was dead, but now I'm not so sure!)

[bbalanjones] 27/3/2019 13:33

HoC: . . . . Good old Sir Oliver Letwin "King" for the Day. Exciting times. TRUE Democratic proceedings.

Peter Bone, as usual, playing the flippant t(wit).

[bbalanjones] 27/3/2019 13:30

patient C: Many thanks: i am seriously behind the times. Silly old duffer!

[bbalanjones] 27/3/2019 13:28

stoned: King Charles was reported to have stated that "You cannot remove the head of your Sovereign" Nobody listened then. Will Teresa be right this time?

[xxxxxy] 27/3/2019 13:27

William Long
Posted March 27, 2019 at 10:20 am | Permalink

You ask if any of the motions to be put to’Indicative vote’ that are popular in Parliament will be compatible with the Conservative or labour Manifestos. Sadly it has become completely clear that a geat number of the MPs of both parties, from the top downwards in both cases, pay little attention now to what they undertook when they asked people to vote for them. The Government in particular is now proceeding on the basis of a totally false prospectus.

[xxxxxy] 27/3/2019 13:25

Roy Grainger
Posted March 27, 2019 at 9:23 am | Permalink

As May and Starmer have already said the Conservatives and Labour parties will not be bound by the outcome, and no-one in the Remain cabal organising the vote have bothered to ask the EU whether they would accept the options the whole thing seems odd – probably some the EU would accept but at a stiff and unknown price. And one option to hold a second referendum isn’t even an outcome at all, just a process, what would the referendum question be ?. I conclude that MPs have insufficient information on any of the options to know what they are voting for and so, following Remain doctrine, we can ignore the votes entirely.