Iofina Share Discussion Threads

[superg1] 09/6/2013 08:55

I know scruts was looking at Nano, I can also see Sandbag in the history of nano posts.

Beer is the PI I respond to as he is on there and via a PM welcomed my looking at it.

If it's just Beer in, then i'll simply use the PM system. But for now Beer I had a quick look at the team in each company, it's another thing I always do.

Not a negative as clearly there will be space for few in the industry, but it's best to have a better picture. Comments on nano being the only cadmium free player are all over the place, but for now, without a deeper look. it appears to be completely untrue.

Here are the teams of each





I know which one impresses me most on their apparent broad experience

[malachey] 09/6/2013 08:30

Thanks Lib (and Fingers, via Plas). I always find these interesting. That must be the 4th or 5th IOF chart he's done for us over the last few months, so you can look back and judge for yourselves as to how accurate he is.

[johncsimpson] 09/6/2013 07:28

Nice posts Mr Blue and ammons. We all have our opinions but one of the aims and objectives of this thread is NOT to engage N3L here. You're free to post what you like, of course, but this board doesn't give dear old Netley much credence and I wouldn't want to see you both moderated off purely because of you posts above. JMO.

May I respectfully suggest you try the other thread on IOF that he moderates (if you can call it that) - look at the quality, incisive analysis he shows re the music industry - yes I said music industry. When you actually find a post on IOF you'll be able to have a whale of a time ridiculing it.

Another bonus is that he's up until the middle of the night and then back early doors – a veritable sort of one man radio show.

Enough and no comments about my comments; it will just give N3L another reason to post here. (Just vote me down).

added - I see Lib has just posted about the time I was writing this. He didn't comment; lets hope nobody else now does . . .

[the librarian] 09/6/2013 07:27

A link to fingers latest chart (post 4474), thanks plas.

[ammons] 09/6/2013 03:11

CR follows and posts about so many companies in so many industries I couldn't even accurately count them all. It stands to reason that he cannot possibly carry out in depth research on all of them. SG1 follows IOF, FUM, maybe one or two others in a minor way. Nuff said. Keep up the good work SG.

Change of subject. Would be nice if the filter button made the filtered posters disappear completely as it does on iii. That would be nice!

[n3tleylucas] 09/6/2013 00:40

Yeah but you've an axe te grind with him, good luck.

[n3tleylucas] 09/6/2013 00:23

No it isn't. Just saying he was right, in what he said. That's all. Don't know him, just read some posts on there today, thought they were great. Nice thread.

[n3tleylucas] 08/6/2013 23:53

Listen to everyone's opinion bridgy, best way, you never know what's around the corner.

[rogerbridge] 08/6/2013 23:43

SG, I realise that and keep up the good work. I was just making the point that I would rather weigh their comments rather than some other recent posters on these threads. If you get my meaning.

[n3tleylucas] 08/6/2013 23:35

About time we had another long-winded oddity from you johncsimpson, you're due.

[n3tleylucas] 08/6/2013 23:32

Come on SCRUTABLE, I'm getting withdrawal symptoms ... post? Please?

[n3tleylucas] 08/6/2013 23:31

CR's thread is great. CR was right. Get over it ...

[snatander] 08/6/2013 23:26

folk on cr thread says" Iofina looks like a scamster..." OucH

And they thinks NANO with a £320m cap isnt a scamster...ouch

[superg1] 08/6/2013 23:01

Roger

I wouldn't assume that certain people carried out in depth research.

They are catching up though, as they have good people around them.

[johncsimpson] 08/6/2013 22:59

Tar muchly Lib . . .

[rogerbridge] 08/6/2013 22:57

Good post SG. Another reassuring point, that has been stated before is an investment company that knows IOF inside out was happy to take part in a $15 million convertible bond issue. Serious investors like Giles Hargreaves and others in the city who have carried out in depth research rate IOF.

[n3tleylucas] 08/6/2013 22:53

And why's superg1 cluttering CR's excellent thread up with egotistical rubbish?

[n3tleylucas] 08/6/2013 22:51

Ah, he only joined half an hour ago. Fair enough.

[n3tleylucas] 08/6/2013 22:49

What took him so long? If you ain't filtered me by now sunshine, boy you must like me. LOL ...

[callmebanana] 08/6/2013 22:42

Not sure about dis share

[n3tleylucas] 08/6/2013 22:22

And by good posts, I mean ones I actually derive a little bit of pleasure from reading. The rest are just ego, nonsense really.