Iofina Share Discussion Threads

[captain_kurt] 19/8/2013 09:55

Morning all...Nice 68k buy just gone through and L2 getting stronger.

[freshvoice] 19/8/2013 09:11

Doh just realised had set to fast access for my phone and this is what caused the problem,
Thanks

[superg1] 19/8/2013 08:56

Fresh ???

Do you mean in the header?.

If so they never left, could be an issue your end, or a new non subscribers block by ADVFN.

[freshvoice] 19/8/2013 08:48

Has anyone got charts back on this bb yet?

[superg1] 19/8/2013 08:35

H

Looking at permit process times one would assume it could take weeks, or even months for certain aspects to progress. That is not an issue as IOF say no revenue until next year.

However in this particular case it could be different and there are grounds to say that, so in the case of 'not long now;, I agree you could well be right.

Of course some may forget that IOF in fact want two further depots in Montana and some in ND. So I wouldn't right off other applications appearing either.

Just the one would be plenty enough. I did quite a bit of work on the water side over the W/E.

[rogerbridge] 19/8/2013 08:17

Some very interesting posts over the week end regarding 3 forks. Thanks all.
I can sense that IOF is coming to the boil nicely, with IO2 increasing production and IO3 a few weeks away. The 3 Forks is a bonus and I would not be surprised if we had some news on our leases before this year is out. We will probably have the oil resources followers investing in IOF before too long. Then there is the water, helium......

[hurricane.] 19/8/2013 08:16

Iofina's water asset is not priced into the Share Price.
Not long now IMO

[bobsworth] 19/8/2013 06:53

N3tleyLucas 18 Aug'13 - 22:28 - 7219 of 7219 1 62 (Filtered)

[n3tleylucas] 18/8/2013 22:28

"With Iodine production likely to rise from around 65-70mt this quarter to well over 300mt in Q1 next year"

You will not produce 300 tonnes of Iodine in Q1 2014.

"life for IOF shareholders is going to be very interesting over the coming months"

Correct. The Fall

[urbanyeti] 18/8/2013 21:58

British Bulls flagged up a buy signal on Friday. http://britishbulls.com/SignalPage.aspx?lang=en&Ticker=IOF.LThey have a better than 2-1 record on Iofina decisions, I've a feeling they are right this time too.

[noli] 18/8/2013 21:09

Just trying to get confirmation on that one SG, but it might never happen.

[superg1] 18/8/2013 20:13

Sorry Noli just saw your choice of words there, lol.

[superg1] 18/8/2013 20:11

Nice to see you back Rockstar.

I'm still working in circles, beyond the realms of the normal digging and thought processes, and hopefully we may have something shortly.

Still interesting about the odd wildcat oil well going in near IOF.

I get the iodine story, and yes the twists and turns simply come from an area going nuts on drilling. The infrastructure for the web of brine pipelines is dropping into place, and those SWD's will be getting plenty of brine.

[noli] 18/8/2013 17:00

We need to start getting ready for IO#2 at full tilt, it wont be long now. Might just go to starbucks and wait it out.

[rock star] 18/8/2013 16:30

With Iodine production likely to rise from around 65-70mt this quarter to well over 300mt in Q1 next year life for IOF shareholders is going to be very interesting over the coming months.

The decision by management to delay the build of IO3,in favour of higher ppm's, has lead to downgrades for production this year to around 250mt but I anticipate significant upgrades to next years production and price targets to come through in the coming months as the new plants come on line.

Despite the brine supplies to IO2 being poor due do the drilling of new wells the silver lining was they are producing as much Iodine at around 60% capacity as was expected at 100%.

[bogg1e] 18/8/2013 15:36

hxxp://impactglassman.blogspot.co.uk/2013/01/radioactive-elements-from-fukushima.html

See: New study indicates severe West Coast impact

The RT article didn't say anything that isnt covered in the other two.

[bogg1e] 18/8/2013 15:31

Cant find the links! - one was via the examiner.com and another from RT. Hang on!

[engelo] 18/8/2013 14:52

Think 1st one should be:

hxxp://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=radioactive-water-leaks-from-fukushima

[spike_1] 18/8/2013 14:46

Hi Bog1eg: your #7206 and #7207 URL's are the same.
Regards - Mike

[bogg1e] 18/8/2013 13:24

This article highlights the spread and decay over time of the fukushima leaks into the pacific. It doesnt highlight however dispersal of radiation by precipitation, which has got into the US food chain, not does it discuss radioactive elements with longer half-life spans, such as plutonium.

www.imarest.org/OurEvents/EventListings/EmissionsConference/22-23October2013.aspx

[bogg1e] 18/8/2013 13:06

Slightly OT too, regarding Fukushima, good article here at Scientific American, although somewhat understated:
www.imarest.org/OurEvents/EventListings/EmissionsConference/22-23October2013.aspx

[engelo] 18/8/2013 13:02

Almost OT but a few points about fracking from latest New Scientist I found interesting:

Global league table of shale resources is China, Argentina, Algeria, US, Canada, Mexico, Australia, South Africa, Russia, Brazil, Poland, France. UK is tiny.

However, China's resource is in the wrong places: mountainous, earthquake prone Sichuan and desert of Xinjiang, territories far from any centres of population. China will therefore continue to expand its heavy dependency on coal for power (400k megawatts electricity from coal fired power stations planned over next 10 years).

Poland's resources look good on paper but extensive drilling has failed to produce any commercial oil/gas at all. 'Even the Texans are scratching their heads'.

UK prospects are completely uncertain. Figures we see in the press are for 'gas in place' and if 10% is recoverable, that's good going.

The US apart of course from being dynamic/ruthless have been very fortunate in the quality of their shales :-)

Eg Barnett shale in Texas is a flat solid expanse whereas many shale resources are fragmented, as in UK.

In a clean world US gas would displace their use of coal: in the real world US coal is being busily exported to UK, Germany etc

All in all over the next few decades shale gas will add to coal emissions, not displace them ;-(

[hitsha3] 18/8/2013 11:53

SG, what do you think of Eden Research, Price right now is 103/4.