Insig Ai Share Discussion Threads

[hazl] 01/5/2023 19:51

The FCA chose this company from all the rest.



Nothing more needs to be said.
You had a quick trade and we are back to doom and gloom.



The market liked it get over it!

[kumbuka] 01/5/2023 19:38

Do ADVFN permit you to promote a commercial enterprise without you paying them Elric ?

I thought that was against their terms and conditions.

[hazl] 01/5/2023 19:37

Insig AI PLC - Expects revenue for year ended March 31 to be at least GBP2.0 million with GBP600,000 from AI business. Says this represents sales growth of 6% at legacy Sport In Schools unit and 60% at Insig AI business. Says current year started positively with a new client award. Forecasts Insig AI revenue of no less than GBP1.4 million in financial 2024 and is "optimistic" of reach operating profitability in financial 2024. Also says Non-Executive Chair Richard Bernstein to become executive chair from June 1. Raises GBP900,000 from subscription of 5.3 million shares at 17p each. Chair Richard Bernstein subscribes for 874,509 shares at same price. Also receives final GBP100,000 trance of Bernstein convertible loan facility.

[kumbuka] 01/5/2023 19:37

So ELRIC LANGTON is trying to get new mugs to pay him for his utter nonsense LOL

Anyone daft enough to pay him to tell you to buy companies like OPTI and SBTX which he is now pumping no doubt hidden from all be those daft enough to join his guilds paying more.

He will take your money if you are daft enough to give it to him.

So carry on making up excuses for your worthless waffle

“Lies are harsh criticism, PJ. It’s more likely the pace of partnership development taking longer than BOD envisaged. This is normal in the fledgling markets. We have seen plenty of evidence of this with SBTX, OPTI, AVA, HVO, etc, etc. AIM littered with many examples of commercial progress being slower than we all hoped.“

It’s funny but for those that have lost money and pj is one.

[hazl] 01/5/2023 19:34

JJ I don't give a flying fig what you think....you berated this company from the get go since I 've been in here and suddenly, get a few under 20p and you're all sweetness and light for five minutes.

[hazl] 01/5/2023 19:32

'Insig AI will be extremely well placed from our judicious investments, ahead of the market yielding significant results. I am also mindful that in a bear market for asset managers, it is all too easy for many to defer investment.

“However, for those who see that now is the right time to apply advanced technologies to underpin a step change in their business to identify market trading opportunities, reduce risk and to better protect their investors, we know how our team can deliver positive, high impact benefits for our customers.”

[hazl] 01/5/2023 19:23

Ah the author does not like people sharing the piece without permission .
Clearly there is a fight between the' fors ' and 'againsts' now but I think once a thing starts it's pretty unstoppable.

[hazl] 01/5/2023 19:23

My troll with many poster names at his disposal has reached here, I see, and marking you up.

Nobody bothered before.
Thing is JJ you have been rude, too, and I am fed up of being restrained ....so there you go!

[elrico] 01/5/2023 18:39

"Elon Musk had voiced concerns about the development of artificial intelligence – signing a letter in March calling for a six-month pause in related tech advancements – he's also ramped up his efforts in the field."

I believe Elon has a series of meetings with the US Congress in a bid to implement safeguards. I doubt it has any negative implications for INSG. At this stage, it is all speculative as to what the specific fears around AI are. I doubt it has anything to do with accounting or drug discovery but more around human cloning. Nobody wants two me, that's for sure. Actually! :)

[hazl] 01/5/2023 18:16

Banshee I think we have got to be careful with this.
I note that Elon Musk was also disappointed, having jointly founded, some aspects of it, that prior safe guards apparently were changed.


'Musk is pushing back against OpenAI and plans to compete with it, he helped found the A.I. lab in 2015 as a nonprofit. He has since said he has grown disillusioned with OpenAI because it no longer operates as a nonprofit and is building technology that, in his view, takes sides in political and social debates.'



If people that have been part of this are warning,when they clearly know so much more than we do then we ought to listen,surely?

[hazl] 01/5/2023 18:08

Far more concise than me Shrewd.


8-)

[hazl] 01/5/2023 17:17

Basically let's all try and get on.

[hazl] 01/5/2023 17:16

The more posters we have interested in INSG the better as far as I'm concerned but I feel I must clear up some contradictions,first,for my own sake.

Elrico, I was looking at this post of yours....now I have more time.
It is strange in it's composition...you mention 'pedantic'...when you had used the term first.
You nit- pick about the exact dates of the start of an uptrend....

you seek to mock by referencing an US calendar quip....

You then admit that charts are only factual if they are historic.....

Lastly
you negate your whole piece by saying....

'None of this matters - I'm just being pedantic; what matters is Zak's reading of the chart, not history.'


contradicting all your previous post!




'elrico - 30 Apr 2023 - 17:27:32 - 2202 of 2229 ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE with INSIG AI - INSG
hazl,

"Charts are not necessarily factual."

Now who is being pedantic? :)

I was referencing the date of the uptrend, which was stated to have begun in February when in fact, it is fact, it started on 24 March. You're not using a US calendar by chance? :)

Charts are factual, but only historically, unless you use paint shop! :)

None of this matters - I'm just being pedantic; what matters is Zak's reading of the chart, not history.'.





How can you expect people to read your views on the Lemmings site.......if you aliennate them?
I don't understand why you have this attitude.
Generally, I am pleased if other investors have picked up on the same points about INSG as I have, but instead you point fingers for no apparent reason.

Strange indeed.

IMO

[shrewdmole] 01/5/2023 17:14

But they would do as a start.

It’s like watching the 100-1 outsider at aintree come flying past.

Going to be fun watching the ride.

[elrico] 01/5/2023 13:37

They're not my figures.

[hazl] 01/5/2023 13:23

'20 jobs that GPT-4 will replace, written by GPT-4:

[kumbuka] 01/5/2023 13:11

Do ADVFN permit you to promote a commercial enterprise without you paying them Elric ?

I thought that was against their terms and conditions.

[kumbuka] 01/5/2023 13:09

So ELRIC LANGTON is trying to get new mugs to pay him for his utter nonsense LOL

Anyone daft enough to pay him to tell you to buy companies like OPTI and SBTX which he is now pumping no doubt hidden from all be those daft enough to join his guilds paying more.

He will take your money if you are daft enough to give it to him.

So carry on making up excuses for your worthless waffle

“Lies are harsh criticism, PJ. It’s more likely the pace of partnership development taking longer than BOD envisaged. This is normal in the fledgling markets. We have seen plenty of evidence of this with SBTX, OPTI, AVA, HVO, etc, etc. AIM littered with many examples of commercial progress being slower than we all hoped.“

It’s funny but for those that have lost money and pj is one.

[shrewdmole] 01/5/2023 11:50

Elric

From memory I believe neither carval nor INSG can announce projections for the fund and AuM until the fund or funds are launched. Something to do with corporate financial governance I believe.

S