![](/cdn/assets/images/search/clock.png)
We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Insig Ai Plc | LSE:INSG | London | Ordinary Share | GB00BYV31355 | ORD 1P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.50 | 3.39% | 15.25 | 15.00 | 15.50 | 15.25 | 14.75 | 15.00 | 151,417 | 14:51:13 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Investors, Nec | 2.09M | -18.56M | -0.1702 | -0.90 | 16.09M |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
12/5/2023 20:13 | Be warned Elric Langton will take your money if you’re foolish enough to give him your money. Look at OPTI that was his last big investment tip. | ![]() kumbuka | |
12/5/2023 20:11 | He’s so arrogant he’s now promoting himself in the PlusOneCoin Top posts. | ![]() kumbuka | |
12/5/2023 20:09 | Don’t be fooled by the con man. | ![]() kumbuka | |
12/5/2023 20:08 | Do NOT part with any money paying him for anything it will be wasted money. | ![]() kumbuka | |
12/5/2023 20:06 | The trouble is Elric Langton he thinks he’s so clever but OPTI is a perfect example to show he isn’t. | ![]() kumbuka | |
12/5/2023 20:03 | He has spent years promoting OPTI. Convincing those foolish enough to be taken in by his poor research and the company is a failed investment. All time low. | ![]() kumbuka | |
12/5/2023 20:03 | It will be intriguing to observe if INSG offers any positive indications upon the launch of the FCA/GFIN collaboration in June. This could potentially generate news and draw the attention of RNS watchers seeking new prospects. INSG is currently flying under the radar. Sharescope readers tend to be technical analysis (TA) enthusiasts, utilising the platform they pay for to obtain signals rather than acting impulsively. | elrico | |
12/5/2023 19:59 | My advice to everyone before being taken in by the egotistical narcissist check out his history. In a word it’s RUBBISH. | ![]() kumbuka | |
12/5/2023 19:58 | And thanks for the generous feedback on the editorial. It is most welcome. | elrico | |
12/5/2023 19:57 | You took the gullible in on your rubbish with SBTX and OPTI How much have people list following your drivel on those 2 ? | ![]() kumbuka | |
12/5/2023 19:53 | Got to give it to you Elric Langton you are good at fooling some, who must be gullible. | ![]() kumbuka | |
12/5/2023 19:50 | Banshee, "In addition, the company has identified a revenue stream by assisting asset managers in improving investment returns and reducing financial risk." I would guess that peeling back the covers on this might be commercially sensitive. I assume INSG believes it has identified a revenue stream competitors have yet to discover. Or, better still, INSG has a trick, or two other competitive tech does not. My hypothesis is based on my asking the question and not getting a response, and I usually do get a response to reasonable queries. | elrico | |
12/5/2023 18:45 | Pj are you still denying we in an uptrend ? | ![]() kumbuka | |
12/5/2023 18:42 | You followed Elric Langton’s rubbish and bought into OPTI. How much has that cost you bully boy pj ? | ![]() kumbuka | |
12/5/2023 18:40 | Hello bully boy pj. Usual rubbish posted by you as usual. | ![]() kumbuka | |
12/5/2023 18:18 | A informative, educational and well researched article Elric which explains logically what the Company actually does and targets much better then anything else I have read, and that includes from INSG themselves. hxxps://knowledge.sh | pj 1 | |
12/5/2023 16:37 | "In addition, the company has identified a revenue stream by assisting asset managers in improving investment returns and reducing financial risk." A bit more detail from INSG would be useful here, given that they identified this as a core activity at the AGM. Fund managers, of course, routinely struggle to outperform, or even match, the market and relevant benchmark indexes, as everyone knows. For all that quote tells us, INSG's strategy could be to provide sight tests and glasses to the monkeys throwing the darts. | ![]() banshee | |
12/5/2023 16:23 | Well done Elric..summarises the very significant Insig offering. | ![]() ltinvestor | |
12/5/2023 15:25 | Much better. | ![]() hazl | |
12/5/2023 14:50 | Elric Fantastic coverage. Well done. Shrewdie | ![]() shrewdmole | |
12/5/2023 14:49 | Exceptional article. Broad ranging and yet incisive hxxps://knowledge.sh | parsnip1 | |
12/5/2023 13:49 | Great write up Elric 👏👏 | ![]() judijudi | |
12/5/2023 12:03 | The Boring Future of Generative AI ChatGPT’s chaotic streak can be charming. Google’s new chat-style search shows text-generation technology is headed in a much tamer direction. Extracts "Google deserves recognition for reining in generative chatbots’ wild side like that. But in my tests, the new search interface felt incredibly tame compared to ChatGPT or Google’s own chatbot Bard." "In March, some big names in AI research signed an open letter calling for a six-month pause on creating machine learning systems more powerful than GPT-4, which powers ChatGPT. Pichai was not a signatory and said in his keynote speech yesterday that the company is currently training a new, more powerful language model called Gemini. A source at Google tells me this new system will incorporate a range of recent advances from different large language models and may eclipse GPT-4. But don’t expect to get to experience the full power or charisma Gemini can offer. If Google applies the same chaos-taming methods seen in its chat-like search experiment, it may just seem like another surprisingly clever autocomplete." | ![]() banshee | |
11/5/2023 16:08 | "The likely winners of the generative AI gold rush Small, specialist models that are cheap to train and fast to run may win out over the broader Big Tech offerings" Extract "But that is not how the world looks to those inside some big tech companies, judging by a leaked memo from one Google executive entitled We Have No Moat. The executive noted this April that Google and OpenAI, heavily backed by Microsoft, may have developed the most capable, closed generative AI models, such as Bard and GPT-4. But they were already in danger of being outrun by more agile competitors that were building smaller, cheaper and more customisable open-source AI models and luring away some of Google’s best researchers. “The uncomfortable truth is, we aren’t positioned to win this arms race and neither is OpenAI,” the executive wrote. “Who would pay for a Google product with usage restrictions if there is a free, high quality alternative without them?” " according to the Google memo, the main beneficiary of the trend towards open-source models might be Meta, which has also been pivoting towards AI. Having launched its own open-source LLaMA model in February, Meta is now aiming to build the platform on which others can play." | ![]() banshee |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions