Insig Ai Share Discussion Threads

[ltinvestor] 03/11/2021 11:47

Banshee.A new broker will be appointed very soon…

[banshee] 03/11/2021 11:46

If they need a new broker they should appoint one, it's a management responsibility, not least in this instance because if they plan to use paper to make acquistions they need to make their shares look attractive rather than a disaster area.

The current broker Zeus look supremely useless but I doubt they are actively refusing to issue a note, that must stem from INSG

[ltinvestor] 03/11/2021 11:38

Nico… you sold all your shares for between 10 and 12p when Matt was involved having owned 8% of USG…Sad and now filtered

[nico115] 03/11/2021 11:04

That's the case in many aim companies They are all falling !!Just think why gamble here with the main man leaving Not worth the risk for me Much better opps elsewhere If Matt has stayed I would be buying now But no interest for me now I did warn you all at much higher prices but you disagreed with me .hey ho

[ltinvestor] 03/11/2021 10:46

Judi.. I agree the share price performance is dire however from what I am hearing there is a major disconnect between the share price performance and company achievements .A decent broker in place would soon reverse the trend.

[judijudi] 03/11/2021 09:56

This is going from very bad to very concerning
Absolutely dire share price performance since re-listing

[judijudi] 02/11/2021 19:38

A couple of very valid points above banshee
Shame you spoiled it with the very childish and incorrect “hut” comment before 🙈

[noujay] 02/11/2021 19:05

Will be very interested to hear your thoughts on how they come across and the content so thanks in advance

[banshee] 02/11/2021 17:50

If it was accompanied by the usual post float paraphernalia like brokers notes and post results anaylsts calls etc, presentations in the regions would be a commendable additional approach, as a solo strategy though it looks less convincing.

Also of some concern is the fact that these guys have presented to 14 fund managers in the last month without apparently generating much (there has been some sizeable) buying interest in their shares. Of course that was not the intended purpose of the presentations, and most or all of these managers may well not have a remit to buy AIM shares for their funds, but privately is another matter, plus of course buying shares is what they do, and they all have contacts.

[pj 1] 02/11/2021 15:46

The Presentation on Wednesday isn't the issue or a part of any problem. What it does though is give the Company opportunity to sell itself, and to prove the RTO wasn't built on quicksand.

[parsnip1] 02/11/2021 15:30

Windswept hut Banshee?

[nico115] 02/11/2021 13:57

Thanks for attending Why did the chairman leave I would've bought if he hadn't have left I won't touch this with a barge pole now and not surprised there's been this decent seller who looks like he wants out

[banshee] 02/11/2021 13:50

Looks like that de facto update on wednesday night can't come soon enough, though how much attention the world is likely to pay to presentation given in a windswept hut in Portsmouth remains to be seen, which is the problem with doing things in that fashion.

[banshee] 01/11/2021 15:51

Thanks PJ - a few suggestions, if they take questions

Why did the former chairmen leave? Is he on board with current strategy?
How is the CarVal deal progressing and when will they (CarVal) be launhcing their new green funds?
Are they planning on expanding into areas where they do not currently have business expertise e.g Pharma.
Any chance of a brokers note?
How did their busy October go?
Are they anticipating parnerships with other fund managers?
New Chairman search?
Do they know who the recent big seller (who no longer seems to be active) was?

[pj 1] 01/11/2021 15:23

All being well I will be attending on Wednesday. I have a few of my own questions that I may not get the chance to get through depending on how many other questions are asked. However, if anyone here does have any specific questions then let me know and then I will do my best, and they may tie in with the one's I have anyway.

[banshee] 01/11/2021 14:44

Presumably we will get some kind of de-facto update via the presentation this week assuming it trickles back to this BB. Something from the compay direct would be nice of course.

[noujay] 01/11/2021 09:23

Useful to be part of it and plenty of fresh impetus likely to be generated over the course of the next couple of weeks via COP26

[ltinvestor] 01/11/2021 07:51

Interesting announcement by Insig regarding their involvement with the UK’s APPG on ESG.Moving in the right circles…

[shrewdmole] 24/10/2021 21:48

Jeez pj.

If you don’t like it just sell.

I for one will be adding a few over the next week or so. It’s the next disruptive tech.

[pj 1] 24/10/2021 19:25

3 years? Say 2 years average.

This could be down to <1p in that time frame.

''affecting'' is rather an unambiguous word in that context

[shrewdmole] 24/10/2021 12:17

Very interesting pullout in the Sunday times about AI and it’s at a pivotal point.

Next 1-3 years most business leaders see it affecting their business.

[banshee] 21/10/2021 19:31

Difficult to comment too much without specific knowledge of a particular target and their precise rationale. Certainly more buying around for the last week or so, no moves yet, though someone had to pay 56.9 with the ask at 56 for just 25k.

[parsnip1] 21/10/2021 12:20

I'm saying it is not difficult to migrate and add an overarching service with pretty much the same technology Banshee. If it were me it would be

[banshee] 21/10/2021 11:28

You're saying that INSG is seeking to become some sort of ML/AI conglomerate diversifying away from just its current fund management business, or using it as a stepping stone along the way? That might explain the departure of the old chairman if he did not agree with the strategy (indeed it is the most plausible reason I have heard to date). If this is the case, let's hope they have some more solid news on the fund management front to get the share price up before any paper acquisition.

If this new strategy worked it could ultimately be very rewarding, but diversifying, even in the same area with hopeful synergies, is not without risks e.g to focus and corporate identity- plus I imagine cash will be needed, paper alone won't be sufficient.

I am also not sure how they propose to evaluate opportunites where they may lack relevant business experience.

[parsnip1] 20/10/2021 22:40

Judijudi, I hear you. However short termism is inimical to medium term growth and longer term gains. It could all change in the space of a few months