Ilika Share Discussion Threads

[horneblower] 31/1/2017 08:57

I see from today's RNS that Ilika are participating in a ShareSoc Growth Company Seminar in London on Wednesday 8 February 2017.

I might go along to that but I'm not hopeful that it will reveal anything we don't already know.

I note that Purdy (ceo) and Boydell (fd) will be there but no scientists. This is I pity.

Anyone else inclined to come?

[horneblower] 25/1/2017 15:37

Today? Who said anything about today?

[stix1] 25/1/2017 15:10

Above 50p by close today you say??? :-)

[horneblower] 25/1/2017 10:56

Sorry, super.
Perhaps I misunderstood you.
To me, the significance is that, after completing a standard, two-phase down wave from 114.5p to 45p it should have begun an up wave. When it didn't I got worried that a further down wave might ensue and it did drop a little further to 42.5p.
However, since hitting 42.5p twice and seeing that 42.5p is a strong support level from 2013, the fact that it has now risen to a point back inside the long-term up trend is, to me, highly significant.
I expect it to remain on an up trend for now and a close above 50p should confirm it.

[supernumerary] 25/1/2017 10:48

The obvious problem with that theory is that there's been little evidence of pumping for rather a long time. Or are you expecting it to start imminently?

[stix1] 25/1/2017 10:42

Where is the evidence that this was anything more than one or two city boy traders getting in at a 2 year low seeing an opportunity for a quick pump & dump? The volumes aren't significant and all the talk here of forming bowls and blue lines here and intersections there are nothing more than twaddle. IMO.

[supernumerary] 25/1/2017 10:19

I only wanted to know why this one was different, and I still don't. Not to worry, I didn't expect to ;¬)

[horneblower] 24/1/2017 23:56

Between the two blue descending lines you expect theoretically to get two equally spaced (proportional) drops.
The bear movement from the peak follows a classic WXYZ descent. It overshoots to a well-defined support level, then rebounds.

So it's behaving in a classical chartist way.

This is more than is expected, so the chance of it continuing in this way is enhanced.

Many charts show no such normal features.

What's not to like?

[supernumerary] 24/1/2017 20:08

Between the two blue descending lines there are at least a dozen ascending black lines like the one that you note as 'significant'. They were not significant (except in their quantity and the fact that they were all followed by longer descending black lines) so why is this one different?

[leonsix1] 23/1/2017 15:52

hxxp://www.growthcompany.co.uk/ilika-benefit-exploding-battery-demand-2553191/

A bit of a puff piece & most of it we’ve heard before. The idea of breaking even for the year to 04/2017 is new & appealing though. GLA

[toptrump1] 18/1/2017 21:37

Good call on metals Big7, did you go to the last IKA investor event?

[gnnmartin] 18/1/2017 12:59

Big7, I'm no fan of Stig, but if he was ramping CCE shortly before it 'disappeared', then he was spot on. CCE renamed itself to REDT (epic RED) in Nov. 2015 and the shares have risen from about 6p via 16p to currently just under 10p.

[the stigologist] 18/1/2017 11:48

and as well as PROX you were a big7ime loser on CBUY as identified by troutisout

example>

[the stigologist] 18/1/2017 11:42

I think your memory is playing tricks on you big7ime...

example>>>

[toptrump1] 18/1/2017 10:51

Having met with CEO last he seemed as confident as ever and I feel First deal is coming in next few weeks followed by a few more thereafter
I like the bod, very professional guys, their RNS' are understated with no bs and management here can be trusted unlike a lot of AIm listed

[big7ime] 18/1/2017 10:34

Take a look at my post history around 13/10/15 (not this thread) the last time I warned people of the Stig
At the time he was ramping two cos that soon after disappeared CCE & Oxs
And shorting and bashing Mtr which soon after multiplied in price by 8x in couple of mths. How wrong can someone be? A very dangerous poster.
I wasn't interested in any of these but made a point, took opposite views - it's all there on that single page - post history page44
Who's the loser?