Hurricane Energy Share Discussion Threads

[senseman] 24/3/2023 13:38

koob - if i am filtered, then pigs fly
your problem is this - whilst a few inevitably may deride me, most know (and certainly on LSE) that I post responsibly, intelligently, and honestly, and do not lie.
your other problem is - that others suspect by now you are up to something - and you will never again be as credible as you were a few weeks ago

[kooba] 24/3/2023 13:32

No still cant see what you are writing..but i guess i know its all good. I am picturing a very sad man getting very worked up. Ha ha ha.

[senseman] 24/3/2023 13:26

sfi2022
RE: Costs Today 13:19 LSE
Senseman, you may have a point. Kooba, 98 posts since the offer/1post prior. Strongly for acceptance. Suspicious. Now trying to discredit the main activist on this BB (along with his little sidekick who has been here a while) it stinks

[senseman] 24/3/2023 13:24

senseman
RE: Costs Today 13:10 LSE
NOTE FOR THE RECORD
ADVFN's kooba has refused to explain to the forum why he is suddenly permanently resident here.
He has been shown to be a bare-faced liar
He has filtered senseman

[senseman] 24/3/2023 13:23

senseman
RE: Costs Today 13:00 LSE
NB
Also, kooba, within our ADVFN message exchanges I informed you (though I knew you already knew) that I copied certain posts of yours I thought of value to LSE)

[senseman] 24/3/2023 13:21

senseman
RE: Costs Today 12:57 LSE
4TH REQUEST
kooba
you are a bare faced liar
we spoke by phone once and i told you if you advfn posted anything i thought lse may especially appreciated reading, i copied it over
and i have made clear on advfn i occasionally copy valid posts over (and nonsense ones if needed to evidence a point)i
i have never complained about anyone copying a post of mine attributing it to me - i complained about a multiple alias poster plagiarising my post and posting it under his name - as well as plagiarising other posters.
so stop bare-faced lying and kindly answer the courteous question put to you on behalf of multiple members

i have no interest in whether you filter me or not. i have never filtered anyone.
if you post trying to mislead the forum, i will hold you to account, as others are beginning to do

[senseman] 24/3/2023 13:20

Kooba
RE: Costs Today 12:43 LSE
You have complained of people posting your posts on advfn from here ffs!
I had no idea you were copying across until you mentioned the other day…i had been on this board a few times in the last year..so have no idea what you post of miner and what comments you have made.

[senseman] 24/3/2023 13:19

senseman
RE: Costs Today 12:33 LSE
3RD REQUEST
koob
let's clear up your latest clever deflective try-on
1. I have copied posts from advfn to here for years and made no secret of it. and posts from here to advfn. No one has ever complained - and certainly not you
2. others posters have done similar, vice versa
3. both are public forums and NO ONE needs authority from ANYONE to copy and paste any post from A to B.
4. if someone posted on advfn that authority was needed for someone to copy a post from one forum to the other you would be the first to post on advfn that no authority was needed and they were talking nonnsense
5. so you know that your reply is nonsense
6. you are not so thin skinned that you care about what people here think of you, and know well enough that usually least said soonest ignored and forgotten
7. so sorry - your reasons for being suddenly residence here don't stack up and i again ask you to explain - why suddenly permanently on LSE?

[senseman] 24/3/2023 13:17

Kooba
RE: Costs Today 12:06 LSE
Why posting here..straight forward ..you posted my posts from advfn here without my authority and i noticed that people were making derogatory and false statements that i have very right to reply. I have had an account on here for a few years and chose not to use it until you started posting my posts ..so you are the reason i am posting here

[senseman] 24/3/2023 13:16

senseman
RE: Costs Today 11:56 LSE
koob - you're at it again with the faulty abacus
and it is not i who has made a beano out of costs projections - i cited 6-8 mil without one-offs as a reasonable yardstick and gave no forward projection. i didn't include one offs and natural increase and i'd be quite happy with 9-10 mill pcm 2023 AVERAGE - it's not alarming as your projections were.
my main purpose has always been to illustrate that yours are exagerated - which they significantly are - you picked them from a cornflake packet when you knew HUR had extraordinary one-offs and ran with it - even now your current 10 mill pcm (March) and rapidly rising through 2023 is WAY MORE more than HUR's own 2023 estimated total. as i said - kooba's faulty abacus
people here are slowly being to see you write cleverly but content when analysed is less than kosher.
and yesterday/today have had 4 emails from posters posing the same fair question - why has kooba suddenly, at a crucial time, taken up permanent residence on here? it's a fair question asked previously but not answered. to be clear - no one objects to you being here - they are just curious at to why now? perhaps you could explain why, suddenly now?

[kooba] 24/3/2023 12:24

You are an absolute waste of time senseman you are a serial liar and have no grip on reality at all. I will not be responding to your rubbish as i consider you a bad actor. I think the deal is a fair one right now ..but i really hope it goes through just because you totally deserve it to.

[kooba] 24/3/2023 11:33

I am clearly not admitting they are wrong ..i took average $10m a month across the year in my calculations ..which is in the now released company range of £110-$120m and still might be entirely accurate..unless you know the wage costs on sea rigs over the next 9 months.https://www.energylivenews.com/2023/03/21/uk-oil-and-gas-sector-faces-tsunami-of-strikes/You really don't get that you are hopeless at this do you...miles out and throwing stones at those that were accurate. Nuts.

[senseman] 24/3/2023 11:19

koob - thanks for admitting your figures are wrong
i haven't been blasting my figures from the rooftop - merely commenting i had taken them for a while to be 6-8 mill pcm, sans any extraordinary one offs. it was also clear i wasn't citing forward ie saying they would be going forward taking into account common sense increase we all are aware of as production slowly decreases
my main point bas always been that yours are not correct and are exagerated - which they are.
if one adds your exagerate costs figures to citing permanently low oil in your calculations, it's easy to see how suddenly your figures now row nicely behind those of HUR BoD (and now CA)in fairy tale land

[kooba] 24/3/2023 11:16

"you cited 10 mill a month (march) and increasing rapidly (let's say to what, 12 mill by end 2023?"I said i was taking $10 per month going forward ..Average of estimate is $9.58m per month i estimate $10m so out by $5m..but could be spot on depending how year pans out.You said they were $6-8m per month..lets take $7mYou were $31m out over the year and far too low ..they were just made up..you think that is clever?

[kooba] 24/3/2023 11:07

Well they certainly aren't your $6-8m made up ones are they !

[senseman] 24/3/2023 10:52

koob - you can believe what you want
and by the way - your costs were NOT accurate
you cited 10 mill a month (march) and increasing rapidly (let's say to what, 12 mill by end 2023?
hurr say 2023 AVERAGE 110 mill - 120 mill ie 9.1 mill to 10 mill average
so costs are NOT currently 10 mill a month and rapidly rising
your figures and prediction would have costs at least $130 mill for the year,ie between 10-20 mill out ie between $1 mill - $1.6 mill a month out.

you are good at misleading people with the stroke of a keyboard
ps. we also don't know if costs include EPL levy and/or some FSP costs - hur costs being notoriously opaque and us not having access to accounts

i repeat - $10 mill pcm in march 2023 and increasing rapidly (for another 9 months) is MUCH higher than $110 mill-$120 mill for whole 2023

you're a devious little tinker when you get going, eh? and you can add up as well as i can - so ignorance is no defence

[kooba] 24/3/2023 10:28

Editing your posts now when picked up...very trustworthy

[senseman] 24/3/2023 09:52

nothing naughty at all kooba, nothing illegal, nothing underhand, not from ca.
whatever our current differences you know by now i don't tell porkies
if i say i know - i know
if i only think - i say i think
the plan proposed with albion was genuine
apart from what i state, i suppose one could also look at it this way - if it was not kosher, it would mean that ca were brazenly lying to the market via rns. i really don't think they would take such risk, do you?

[kooba] 24/3/2023 09:30

How is that ..do you have inside information from CRS? Is the information on CRS plans you posted also based on direct communication with them..if it is then they could be in breach of take over code and their irrevocable undertaking? They could be engaged in hampering the scheme that they very publicly supporting..by encouraging you to post against the scheme. Who are you acting for??

[senseman] 24/3/2023 09:25

Koob - I quite agree of king of speculative assumptions
And there's another flying pig just passed my window
Have a nice day
By the way, I can tell you with absolute certainty that Albion was not a put up.

[kooba] 24/3/2023 09:04

Strikes me it is not the company that is desperate and panicking!Pre-guessing CRS next move when they are totally committed to this transaction is an unusual approach when you have no idea what their thoughts are apart from wanting this to go through.Knowing why CRS put Albion up and then withdrew the GM again is pure speculation.Maybe it was some clever game playing by CRS putting pressure on the board to deliver the exit strategy that they had publicly declared...job done.Maybe Albion who seemed to think they could just go drilling for more oil on Lancaster did their due diligence and spoke to the NSTA and realised that it wasn't for them.Either way presuming that bringing in Albion would create a new golden age for Hurricane ( actually they never had one in terms of finds!) and not just be a very high risk exploration strategy that would be hit or miss over a long timeframe without having any detail on their plans if there really were any is an amazing vote of confidence in the unknown.Maybe after years of disappointment many shareholders including the better informed 45% prefer a realistic exit strategy than just throwing the dice again and risking everything.The long list of other off beam points on the previous post is again all just desperate stuff and i haven't got time or inclination to bother debunking it all. The funniest is the end"NOMAD should not be broker ..illegal conflict of interest."Just bizarre in the majority of aim stocks the NOMADs are also company broker...it is a very normal position and there is no recognised conflict of interest..it is absolute not illegal and to suggest so is just more ignorance and lies.