ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for charts Register for streaming realtime charts, analysis tools, and prices.

HUR Hurricane Energy Plc

7.79
0.00 (0.00%)
17 Jun 2024 - Closed
Delayed by 15 minutes
Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Hurricane Energy Plc LSE:HUR London Ordinary Share GB00B580MF54 ORD 0.1P
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  0.00 0.00% 7.79 - 0.00 01:00:00
Industry Sector Turnover Profit EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap
0 0 N/A 0

Hurricane Energy Share Discussion Threads

Showing 87476 to 87500 of 96000 messages
Chat Pages: Latest  3504  3503  3502  3501  3500  3499  3498  3497  3496  3495  3494  3493  Older
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
30/9/2021
17:36
Yes I had noticed the bubble point being put back but they commented at the same time it was 'consistent with the time frame outlined in March ..err nope not really.Also leads to articles like the one below which I believe are misleading ...are the ceo and FD the biggest derampers ??I see production ahead of forecast , Brent ahead of forecast and the bubble point being revised back..and we get this!https://www.heraldscotland.com/business_hq/19613928.hurricane-energy-bracing-bubble-point-off-shetland/
kooba
30/9/2021
17:20
I thought they had a temp rolling permission to produce below the bubble point...The latest RNs actually puts the expected bubble point timing further on till end Q12022.When it was late 2021 early 2022 as per May.If they could tighten the choke post bubble you could be looking at production to cover equity a couple of times no?Agree a bit of gamble!
officerdigby
30/9/2021
16:58
kooba, it was fair and proper that equity were given a fair chance of recovering value. Whilst I think it's likely there will be little or no value ultimately it was the corrupt City trying to steal any potential and causing equity an immediate loss that really annoyed me.

That's why I also object to BoDs granting easy options etc. just stealing from the trough at shareholders expense.

I agree you fought the corner admirably.

ngms27
30/9/2021
16:54
oil surging back towards recent highs
stockhunters
30/9/2021
16:46
The nearest play to HUR prior to the EPS right now is TXP. Multiple discoveries awaiting production facilities to monetize. I'm heavily invested there.

By Q2 2022 cash should be flowing in copious amounts from two proven and tested Gas discoveries.

If the recent Royston discovery proves viable on test then we could be looking at a double prior to XMAS and it's likely 1TCF plus recoverable, so large enough to support an LNG train on it's own.

ngms27
30/9/2021
16:44
There will always be undisclosed information that you are not privy to. Because of this you will at best, always be only half right.
evilblues
30/9/2021
16:44
Won what fight..not with you?

Think I fought equities corner better on the restructuring and CA rather better than anyone ..though did notice your tempered horror at the proposals ..but since you think there is no value to equity you should have supported the move ..otherwise it doesn’t really makes sense does it?

Not sure Bluewater would go for a monthly rolling contract…but hope you are right has that would be superb news…more likely a 12 month with break terms.

There’s a lot of water to go through the old FPSO before a new strategy needs to be framed..got to lose those pesky bondholders first and maybe not show them additional potential value or they’ll be back trying to nick it.

No low blows fella..you like to put yourself up to shoot down ..your choice I guess. But you’re somewhat full of it and have the skin of a rhino so you carry on enjoying yourself ! Glad you hope the stock goes better..many won’t believe you!

kooba
30/9/2021
16:43
sloppyg,

My model was around economic production which you well know was 10k bopd @$40 oil. It was the water cut that would put the production below 10k. @ $80 oil the economic cutoff is 5k bopd.

I've held my hand up and stated that my model was wrong and I also know why it was wrong, which was undisclosed information that has since been disclosed.

ngms27
30/9/2021
16:33
Kooba, -2 points for two below the belt punches. I'm going to go for the knockout blow over the next 6 rounds having already won the fight if I remain standing.

For the record I'd love HUR's share price to once again hit 58p and equity to be richly rewarded. I did fight equities corner against the CB Holders and was very happy that the right outcome was achieved.

However one has to accept that the white knight shareholder CA will be forced to exit it's position following the wind-up vote in November unless their activist shareholder can be persuaded otherwise. I also agree the windup will likely take many months and wont be instantaneous.

Yes I'm emotionally but not financially invested here at present as I see HUR as a pure gamble without any credible plan being put forward. I think they are looking to maximise return from well 6 by extending the FPSO on a monthly rolling contract post July 2022 and that it's likely no further work will be carried out.

ngms27
30/9/2021
16:27
....that wasn't by any chance the same model that had the watering out 6 months ago ?
sloppyg
30/9/2021
16:24
Oh heck China’s going to the pumps to fill up now!
kooba
30/9/2021
16:22
Modelling..what is it good for...200p to absolutely nothing ...say it again ...and again ....and again.
kooba
30/9/2021
16:14
sloppyg, you're wrong on many counts.

I categorically believe I was the first to raise concerns and fight the corner of the water source being the aquifer on ADVFN and did do lots of independent research to put forward this proposition.

I didn't lose 30p per share on HUR, but I did buy a tranche close to the top and at one point HUR was close to a farm bet being about 50% of my portfolio. My lowest and largest purchase was at 14p to put some perspective on this.

The reason it put my retirement back was because I had modelled HUR being over 200p per share now, so it was more lost opportunity cash that I thought was close to a banker.

The fact remains that the old BoD did not publish important information that would in my opinion have stopped the EPS going ahead had it been in the public domain. This was also again in my opinion a failure of the Competent Person Report to be properly objective IF they were provided all the data such as water saturations from samples taken below structural closure. They also conveniently dismissed what they judged to be an erroneous data point that we now know was in fact correct.

ngms27
30/9/2021
16:11
oil blue again
stockhunters
30/9/2021
16:00
eng and trice - huge difference
kaos3
30/9/2021
15:53
If anyone knows anyone this might help please share.https://www.helpguide.org/articles/mental-disorders/narcissistic-personality-disorder.htm
kooba
30/9/2021
15:51
kooba common sense
stockhunters
30/9/2021
15:49
Explains the sour grapes..he had fallen hook line for Trice and got over exposed then cut and ran and now just wants the company to fail...bitter and twisted.
kooba
30/9/2021
15:47
'It doesn't help that there will also be over 25% of equity for sale in the market when Seba liquidate Crystal Amber in November either.'There is an upcoming continuation vote which will likely mean proposals are put in place over a period of time...Saba don't run it and won't be liquidating.BS as usual..and it's Saba can't even get the name right!You should just try and occasionally check your facts otherwise folks will think your just some demented deramper.
kooba
30/9/2021
15:44
NGMS

As you know it was DSPP on lemon fool who first called that one; you just belatedly followed suit.

Regarding your perceptions of what "being right" entails it is indeed an interesting one. You are on record here saying you lost circa 30p a share on HUR and that your over exposure on that investment had pushed back your retirement years.

If this is you calling it right then I dread to see what your wrong calls look like !

The only people that have called this right to date are the ones that considered it offered a better risk/return at sub 1p then it did at circa 50p with a £1Bn MC and unproven EPS.

Perhaps you should have applied the same relentless (and I mean relentless) forensics that you do now to your original investment case ?

sloppyg
30/9/2021
15:32
Post from lse bb today:

TopCat81
Posts: 372
Price: 3.304
No Opinion
Today 14:57

Don’t Sell Your Shares 4 Beer Money Here, Be Patient With The New BoD

HUR turnaround (along with that of the PoO) has already commenced, patience/time needed for the the new very much improved HUR BoD to sort out issues created by the crooked Ex-BoD, so make sure that you don’t get suckered into selling here, especially on low trading volume days like today and giveaway your soon to be extremely valuable HUR shares for close to nothing, DYOR, and GLA.

luckyjoe999
30/9/2021
15:26
Fantasist.
tradoil
30/9/2021
15:15
derampers out in force
stockhunters
30/9/2021
15:10
evilblues, yes I'm the one who on here who called the water cut issue as from the Aquifer not perched with the share price in the 30's. It took the BOD ages longer to actually admit it.

You can add SOU,AEX,EOG,RR,AUL,SIA,GKP,PANR,AST and many others to that list.

I believe a conference call with AST precipitated the downfall of the then CEO as I asked questions he couldn't answer.

ngms27
30/9/2021
15:01
Out of interest have you ever actually got anything right re your speculative gems? I've seen you crawling over various boards for years now and never have I seen you call something correctly. Asking for a friend.
evilblues
Chat Pages: Latest  3504  3503  3502  3501  3500  3499  3498  3497  3496  3495  3494  3493  Older