Hemogenyx Pharmaceuticals Share Discussion Threads

[davevt] 03/2/2020 11:02

Anyway..

Please send him this.

Ask him why every time a new contract is made the revenues conveniently go into a new subsidiary of which only him and his wife are directors. Why is his wife on it anyway 😂

Ask him why doing this stops cash going into the main hemo account and hence makes it not look cash rich hence they can still place,WHICH HAS JUST HAPPENED.

Ask them what financial costs the subsidiaries incur, and have they paid back any costs to hemo. If not, why not. If they say the subs don't incur any costs, then what's the point of them collecting money you're never going to spend.

Ask them why they block anyone that asks these questions via twitter..

Marie, for a fact, the company had a load of research and work done by hemo, gets a contract, revenues from that benefit on research go into a sub and not back to the hemo company. That is legally, legitimately 'diverting' funds. It's not illegal, anyone can do it, and those subs can pay whoever they like. But when you're a shareholder of a company, and you don't see the fruits of your labour coming back to the company you're invested in, and then you see said company say 'we need to dilute your shares because we need more money', it's a sour taste, correct

[davevt] 03/2/2020 11:01

Experienced traders that couldn't even see a placing coming? Those experienced traders? 😅

[purple11] 03/2/2020 11:00

why do you feel the need to impart your wisdom on experienced traders when you have no experience of trading on the market in the first place!

[purple11] 03/2/2020 10:51

avacta

brought at 18.85 sold at 27 about a week or so later!

a lovely trade and a great company.i will be reentering soon.
ive been trading everyday for about 14 years now.

and yes I was the man that paid 4p for £40k of taylor wimpey stock!(which is how I gave up work)

and yes the market is v weak at the moment it is a tight market.the volumes across the board are terrible.
and yes a lot of the people I trade with agree with me on that.noone is making large gains these days.

anyway back to you...have you ever brought a share?

[purple11] 03/2/2020 10:48

must be pretty boring spending all day on bulletin boards if you don't have any positions open.

must be a v sad life to have nothing in it!

[purple11] 03/2/2020 10:47

still no answer

what shares do you own?

[purple11] 03/2/2020 10:46

if you had any money surely you would be holding some stock in something!

after all you you spend all day and nite on financial bulletin boards.

do you own no shares in anything?

lol

[davevt] 03/2/2020 10:46

Awh bless, you're pretending to be a trader 😅😅

[purple11] 03/2/2020 10:45

I trade shares all day.a berk like you just keeps me amused whilst I am monitoring positions.

atleast ive the money to buy stock.

like I said what shares do you currently hold?

[davevt] 03/2/2020 10:43

Look at you desperately spamming the board.

Why aren't you sitting back waiting for 12p.

[purple11] 03/2/2020 10:42

what shares do you own?

[davevt] 03/2/2020 10:42

Please send him this.

Ask him why every time a new contract is made the revenues conveniently go into a new subsidiary of which only him and his wife are directors. Why is his wife on it anyway 😂

Ask him why doing this stops cash going into the main hemo account and hence makes it not look cash rich hence they can still place,WHICH HAS JUST HAPPENED.

Ask them what financial costs the subsidiaries incur, and have they paid back any costs to hemo. If not, why not. If they say the subs don't incur any costs, then what's the point of them collecting money you're never going to spend.

Ask them why they block anyone that asks these questions via twitter..

Marie, for a fact, the company had a load of research and work done by hemo, gets a contract, revenues from that benefit on research go into a sub and not back to the hemo company. That is legally, legitimately 'diverting' funds. It's not illegal, anyone can do it, and those subs can pay whoever they like. But when you're a shareholder of a company, and you don't see the fruits of your labour coming back to the company you're invested in, and then you see said company say 'we need to dilute your shares because we need more money', it's a sour taste, correct

[purple11] 03/2/2020 10:41

yeah sure....more lies

[davevt] 03/2/2020 10:39

Purple, you've seen my properties and cars, you know I can buy your life..

[purple11] 03/2/2020 10:38

I take it youre unemployed this being Monday morning?
do you claim housing benefit?

[purple11] 03/2/2020 10:37

you don't want to ask them yourself because you don't want to give your identity away.
wonder why?

[davevt] 03/2/2020 10:34

Yes purple, they did exactly that.

[purple11] 03/2/2020 10:30

"Marie has emailed and tweeted the company about this very point, and has been IGNORED AND BLOCKED. it's not like they could even say they never got her email about it, they have intentionally BLOCKED HER."

[purple11] 03/2/2020 10:29

im copying his posts ready to send to him.

[marie1980] 03/2/2020 10:27

Dave, type exactly what you want me to reply and I'll do.

Let's clear this topic. I find their reply satisfactory though. It shows they do care about their shareholders.

[davevt] 03/2/2020 10:24

I told you their reply would be pointless, though I don't know why he mentioned 'syphoning or misplaced', as that's not what I said, so what did you actually ask Marie? Though even if they were they are hardly going to admit it 😂

You should have been asking can you see financial accounts for the subsidiaries, that's it.

and Marie, I do not deramp, and who needs to deramp a 'spike'...that's why it's called a spike, as it comes back down again of it's own accord.