||EPS - Basic
||Market Cap (m)
Hayward Tyl Share Discussion Threads
Showing 1576 to 1600 of 1600 messages
|Someone mentioned submarines the other day
|Yes, I have met Dion when we both had holdings in Inditherm and subsequently IHC.|
|I seem to recall the last RNS holder was also a big holder and may still be in Tricorn -so obviously likes and knows this space.|
|Apols meijiman, I could have added more detail!|
|Thanks rhomboid. Don't think i will trouble the scorers then.|
|It's over 1% in a bid situation iirc|
|Are you suggesting that if I was to buy say £5k of Hayward shares I would have to make a public disclosure?|
|Why is this chap making a disclosure when he is below 3%?|
|Back to 80 p is my guess|
|RR, " rabid ramper" you have to be joking.
If you look back at my posts they are almost invariably a response to illogical and self serving nonsense posted by you and others.
I did not post (and said I would not post) while I was considering my position regarding share dealing and since then I have not bought or sold.
As far as trying to move the price I have just accused you and others of this so rather pathetic to make this charge in response.
My holding here is modest compared to the rest of my portfolio and I can assure you that my interest on this board has only been sparked by nonsense comments by the likes of yourself.
For your information the AVG share price has been rising because it is being pushed by Simon Thompson in IC and of course the belief by some that they can get HAYT on the cheap.
The big question for most here is why didn't they buy at under 40p ?
Perhaps they were paying too much attention to posts on a BB ...ALWAYS A MISTAKE !!!|
|2 reactors coming back online in Japan.
Especially as it is in the UK, main bulk is being done in Germany. As you say though would be good to place some orders with PB.|
it would be good if PB received some knock on work from the Siemens order (as they have done on a recent ST Gearbox refurb). Have to say though it is unlikely as the plant is rated at 380MW and PB limit is 40MW.
My hope is that they have not exhausted their workload on the Astute Submarines. Boat 6 is well underway ( build commenced 2012) but I am not too sure on the status of boat 7.
Hopefully if Trident gets the nod there may be lucrative orders there too, but that's some way off.|
no, I did mean presume - i.e. in the context of assume with attitude.
ps "Now we have AVG shareholders dishing the dirt in the hope that their company can bag a bargain. Interesting that these AVG shareholders post here yet the AVG BB is very quiet !! ".
I hope that' s not another incorrect assumption on your part, I am posting here because I hold HAYT as do a lot of other AVG shareholders
Perhaps the AVG BB is very quiet because it does not have a rabid ramper dishing the dirt to drum up posting activity under the misguided impression they can influence the sp, FYI the AVG share price has been rising steadily regardless!|
|Everyone holding their breath this week? Any guesses on the RNS day?
I'll go for Wednesday.|
|Well spotted grahamwales, I missed that completely.
I agree that this would put PB well in front for the supply of new/replacement equipment.|
|Was thinking Siemens have relationship with PB as former owners.|
|I agree alter.|
I agree with those who have said that the situation with the cash flow could have been handled better but then it's always easy to be critical when you are not making the decisions and there are lots of moving part here.
Most of the critical posters were ex HAYT shareholders who, having sold, criticised the company either to justify their sale or to talk the price down.
Now we have AVG shareholders dishing the dirt in the hope that their company can bag a bargain.
Interesting that these AVG shareholders post here yet the AVG BB is very quiet !!
Anyway the biggest mistake made was when people , no matter what their original reservations were , failed to appreciate that the share price had fallen much further than these reservations justified......that was the time to buy.
The market always over reacts .....up and down.
grahamwales, only a quick scan of your post/link, did PB do the original work ?
Even if PB didn't do the original installation I agree that this looks the type of thing they would be in the frame for.|
|Keep posting Pavey Ark. it's refreshing to read such well reasoned and factual analysis compared to the supericial and perhaps self serving denigration of HAYT|
"You presume too much and spout an awfull lot."
I think you mean assume but I do like to back up what I'm saying with facts and figures,sorry if that annoys you.
If you have been focusing on orders you have perhaps missed the point that not all orders merit an announcement and income is generated from other sources.
Your post (1561)stated :- "Also orders appear to be in place to sustain turnover in for H1 but who knows what will happen in H2 ?"
This suggests to me that you don't really have a handle on the order situation and how it works with a company like HAYT.
This was also the reason I reacted to your post(s).|
|The agreement includes the installation and long-term servicing of a gas turbine, the servicing of a generator and a steam turbine, as well as the modernization of the existing instrumentation and control systems.|
|Possible PB order to come.
|Pavey, You presume too much and spout an awfull lot. FYI my focus has been more on orders and less on debt just look back at my last dozen posts, which is why I still see a potential hole in PB order book. Tell me something I dont know and provide some clarity on that.|