ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for alerts Register for real-time alerts, custom portfolio, and market movers

GVC Gvc Holdings Plc

1,039.50
0.00 (0.00%)
26 Apr 2024 - Closed
Delayed by 15 minutes
Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Gvc Holdings Plc LSE:GVC London Ordinary Share IM00B5VQMV65 ORD EUR0.01
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  0.00 0.00% 1,039.50 1,038.50 1,039.50 - 0.00 01:00:00
Industry Sector Turnover Profit EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap
0 0 N/A 0

Gvc Share Discussion Threads

Showing 24276 to 24298 of 40525 messages
Chat Pages: Latest  973  972  971  970  969  968  967  966  965  964  963  962  Older
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
09/12/2016
11:07
Fest - OK, I would reduce the minimum per number to 10p with a maximum of say 50p, with a maximum stake per spin of say £5.
loganair
09/12/2016
10:58
Logan, it's 25p minimum per number, £13.75 maximum on a single number. Hence it prevents you from winning more than £500 on a single turn.
festario
09/12/2016
10:56
Fest - I can see of no reason why for a relatively small about of money, less then £5 one can´t cover all the numbers on roulette if one is able to put say 10p on a number.

As I do not go into betting shops I do not know how much one has to put on a number.

loganair
09/12/2016
10:53
Professor David Nutt, of Imperial College London, said: ‘No one is going to get addicted from placing a bet on the Grand National once a year, "but on these machines you can place 50 bets an hour."
loganair
09/12/2016
10:52
£100 limit can't happen, how is a punter supposed to win his money back?£2 per spin can't happen, you'll hardly cover any of your numbers on roulette.£10 to £20 a spin is reasonable, and it would probably have helped me with the addiction that I myself had to those machines, possibly saving me well over £150k
festario
09/12/2016
10:34
Sorry, I should have said clamping down on them.

The push behind this is I think problems seen by MPs in their surgeries. Basically they are causing debt. So I think they will come down strongly.

whiskeyinthejar
09/12/2016
10:34
Fest

They are talking of reducing the maximum that can be spent on any one throw of the dice/spin of the wheel, from £100 down to £2!! Even if it turns out only to be limited to the industry predicted level of £10, that will result in a massive reduction in their profits.

mylands
09/12/2016
10:32
Fest - I hear vastly reducing the current £100 limit on the machines and only allowing 2 machines per shop which is going to hurt Ladbrokes/Coral the most as they have by far the most bricks and mortar outlets, around 50% more then Hills do.
loganair
09/12/2016
10:28
They're not getting rid of them, there'll be some fudge by way of new limits, discretionary banning of 'problem' customers, grants for organisations that help with addicts etc.The Govt won't want to turn off this tax revenue fountain!In the meantime, it's time for any shorters to rush for the exits.There's one small door, and many racing for it, I hope Slippy doesn't get hurt in the crush.
festario
09/12/2016
10:25
I think it's positive for gvc.

These machines have been getting the gambling industry a bad press, so getting rid of them is a good thing for companies like gvc who aren't reliant on them.

whiskeyinthejar
09/12/2016
10:15
You would have thought that funds that have an exposure to the secotor would be switching from LADB and WMH to the online companies and give us a boost!
mylands
09/12/2016
09:55
I am reading as they have so many bricks and mortar betting shops that Ladbrokes/Coral are going to be hit hard if the legislation on Fixed Betting Machines comes in as tough as they say it may, will completely wipe of their profits, won´t be good for Hills either, however will not effect GVC at all.
loganair
09/12/2016
09:09
Over a million just been traded in four deals at 625p. Perhaps this is the end of an overhang?
mylands
09/12/2016
06:44
looking to add more in the coming days, anyone have any idea on the trading update for the 4th qtr (normally in early Jan)
shayadfn
09/12/2016
02:29
Topped up.I am also long term, holding 7000 shares atm.Best stock in my Portfolio along with HGM.Mylands your posts do not go unnoticed,and 24121 was superb. Also I have the Troll filtered.
garycook
08/12/2016
19:04
Well I did say yesterday about why we were far better positioned compared to other firms with a strong U.K exposure due to an unfriendly regulatory environment!

Nice to see we were untroubled by it today with the betting machine issue

diviincomesearch
08/12/2016
17:17
Thanks Morph, simply stating the facts as I see them.

It would be good to see more longterm GVC holders saying the same thing, but then maybe I am hoping for too much!

mylands
08/12/2016
16:55
Good post mylands
morph7
08/12/2016
16:17
Just goinh through some September posts predicting £10 here by Xmas.

Hmmmm enough said.

slipperysidewinder
08/12/2016
15:19
Desperate posts getting more regular.
srpactive
08/12/2016
15:03
Fizzy, don't worry Sir, as I always back up those comments with a purchase. I'm thinking that given the projected EPS and yields, GVC has simply found its new trading range, 600-700p. Seems about right.When Sir Kenneth next makes his next move, or results surprise to the upside, only then will we re-rate upwards.
festario
08/12/2016
14:19
Looks like golden years are over.
slipperysidewinder
08/12/2016
14:18
The chart showing a finish below 615 will probably fall to next resistance 525.

Ther is just no appetite for GVC.

slipperysidewinder
Chat Pages: Latest  973  972  971  970  969  968  967  966  965  964  963  962  Older

Your Recent History

Delayed Upgrade Clock