Gulf Keystone Petroleum Share Discussion Threads

[hearts1] 27/10/2016 19:01

Oh dear.I've just read iii, Carroll, not content with being an idiot over poison pill is now spouting some lock in rubbish.

[lardner23] 27/10/2016 18:59

O-I,

I have explained I'm not keen on Lobdon [sic]. Nor am I a fan of Skype. Telephone? Are you serious? You have previous there. Do you not have a passport?

You've gone all vague about my proposed method. I would like to test out the routing. You email cut, cut gets my contact details from stalker63 and passes the message on. Easy. If it works I'll let you know.

What are you talking about re the Tweet? You are the specious one in these 'ere parts. I highlighted the inconsistency.

Btw, there's still only one of me.

[hearts1] 27/10/2016 18:59

You didn't quote the latest CPR, it was the usual ' something Ewan said in 2010 ' chestnut.

[oil_investor] 27/10/2016 18:51

Oh dear.

I posted the long-run post-tax profit figures per barrel, as given by GKP.

Quite what lardner23 is seeking to prove, I have no idea.

[oil_investor] 27/10/2016 18:49

Oh dear.

Yet more selective posting by lardner23, who claims surprise that I have seen their post and makes a reference to them having been on filter months ago.

But they know full well that I am reading their posts these days, because they were discussing with me a meeting between us which they suggested could be held in Lille. And they also know that I suggested that, in view of the fact that they say they live near to Tony Peart, that the meeting would be more logically held in London. And that I suggested using Skype, and then the telephone (both reliable technologies) and that they then suggested to me that I contact them via some third party. And that I then suggested simply sending me a PM...which they have not done.

And taking tweets out of contact and putting emphasis on parts of them, which is not in the original, can result in a misleading impression.

Oh well.

[lardner23] 27/10/2016 18:48

BD, I did the 2015 sums for O_I the other day. I think it worked out that revenue per barrel was around $7-8, from which ALL business costs have to be deducted.

His argument earlier is based on having alternative income streams.

It really was specious. Definition: "superficially plausible, but actually wrong, misleading in appearance, especially misleadingly attractive".

[bigdog5] 27/10/2016 18:31

Paid yes but paid the correct amount?
Paid for the correct amount of barrels?
The discount we have seen is rather high.

A special relationship.

[lardner23] 27/10/2016 18:22

Saucer of milk, my dear?

PS You claimed to have put me on filter months ago. Cuh, can't rely on technology these days.

[oil_investor] 27/10/2016 18:20

Lardner23 seems to be very busy scouring the Internet!

[j0ck ewing] 27/10/2016 18:17

Is that a rhetorical question, Oliver?

[hearts1] 27/10/2016 18:15

Lol, you've got to give him ten out of ten for effort. On a serious note shows how social media has effected certain people who didn't grow up with it.

[lardner23] 27/10/2016 18:13

Dear old Rous@untakenscreen:


In reply to AhmadRasoul®06;
Rous ‏@UntakenScreen Sep 24
@AhmadRasoul @UticaRisk @Mikeknightsiraq I largely agree: poor success rate on these anticlines. But Gulf Keystone succeeds - and isn't paid


In reply to Policing South Warks
Rous ‏@UntakenScreen 10 hours ago

@SWarksCops @nadhimzahawi Mr Zahawi, DEATH THREATS are made against your shareholders and you tweet about a BICYCLE? Shame on you.



In reply to Nadhim Zahawi
Rous ‏@UntakenScreen 6 hours ago

@nadhimzahawi Maybe that bicycle belongs to one of your shareholders who has perhaps been murdered, following the murder and arson threats?

[oliver666] 27/10/2016 17:43

Gulfsands that stinker. JOHN HELLS BEELS ELECTED ONTO THE GKP BOARD BY CLOWSN WHO HAD VESTED INTERESTS IN WZR. KEPIS POBE, ..BY THE RIVER'S OF BABYLON, WHERE THE SUNCOR SHINES AND MAD GOGS AND ENLISHMEN WITH SCOTS THRIVE TO PLUNDER... REMIND ME WHAT HATFIELD AND HAWRMI TALABANI GAME WAS .

[1712notout] 27/10/2016 17:40

Huge buy
😪😠😠😥8544;😠ԅ49;😎😴;😱😪

[oil_investor] 27/10/2016 17:29

Oh dear.

Phillis asserts that the Kurdistan Regional Government doesn't pay.

But it does.

As yesterday's RNS makes clear.

Indeed, the KRG have paid for every barrel of oil produced at Shaiksn from 1 January 2015 to 31 August 2016.

Thereby evidencing that what he has asserted is wrong.

In fact, I have a corporate customer who is more behind in paying than is the KRG! Am I bothered? Of course not. Because I manage my finances to cover such things, so therefore it makes no difference.

Yes there are some KRG arrears, relating to pre-2015 production and Shaikan BIR back-costs...the Minister of Natural Resources referred to those during this very week. But that's not the same as asserting that the KRG "doesn't pay".

[phillis] 27/10/2016 17:12

When your whole business enterprise is geared around a customer who doesn't pay and might disappear in a warzone we shouldn't be at all surprised that sensible financial rescues are impossible