We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Register to chat with like-minded investors on our interactive forums.
| Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Greencoat Uk Wind Plc | LSE:UKW | London | Ordinary Share | GB00B8SC6K54 | ORD 1P |
| Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -1.80 | -1.40% | 127.20 | 3,127,369 | 16:35:19 |
| Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 128.20 | 128.40 | 129.00 | 127.00 | 129.00 | |
| Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Finance Services | 234.38M | 126.19M | 0.0556 | 23.06 | 2.93B |
| Last Trade Time | Trade Type | Trade Size | Trade Price | Currency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 16:35:19 | UT | 685,042 | 127.20 | GBX |
| Date | Time | Source | Headline |
|---|---|---|---|
| 13/12/2024 | 07:00 | UK RNS | Greencoat UK Wind PLC Transaction in Own Shares |
| 12/12/2024 | 09:44 | UK RNS | Greencoat UK Wind PLC Director Declaration |
| 12/12/2024 | 07:00 | UK RNS | Greencoat UK Wind PLC Transaction in Own Shares |
| 11/12/2024 | 07:00 | UK RNS | Greencoat UK Wind PLC Transaction in Own Shares |
| 10/12/2024 | 07:01 | UK RNS | Greencoat UK Wind PLC Transaction in Own Shares |
| 10/12/2024 | 07:00 | UK RNS | Greencoat UK Wind PLC Revision to Investment Management Agreement |
| 09/12/2024 | 07:00 | UK RNS | Greencoat UK Wind PLC Transaction in Own Shares |
| 06/12/2024 | 07:00 | UK RNS | Greencoat UK Wind PLC Transaction in Own Shares |
| 05/12/2024 | 07:00 | UK RNS | Greencoat UK Wind PLC Transaction in Own Shares |
| 04/12/2024 | 07:00 | UK RNS | Greencoat UK Wind PLC Transaction in Own Shares |
Greencoat Uk Wind (UKW) Share Charts1 Year Greencoat Uk Wind Chart |
|
1 Month Greencoat Uk Wind Chart |
Intraday Greencoat Uk Wind Chart |
| Date | Time | Title | Posts |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12/12/2024 | 21:48 | GREENCOAT UK WIND | 1,117 |
| Trade Time | Trade Price | Trade Size | Trade Value | Trade Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-13 16:35:19 | 127.20 | 685,042 | 871,373.42 | UT |
| 2024-12-13 16:29:11 | 128.35 | 11,623 | 14,918.12 | O |
| 2024-12-13 16:27:53 | 128.30 | 62 | 79.55 | O |
| 2024-12-13 16:27:36 | 128.20 | 1,537 | 1,970.43 | AT |
| 2024-12-13 16:27:36 | 128.20 | 1,096 | 1,405.07 | AT |
| Top Posts |
|---|
Posted at 14/12/2024 08:20 by Greencoat Uk Wind Daily Update Greencoat Uk Wind Plc is listed in the Finance Services sector of the London Stock Exchange with ticker UKW. The last closing price for Greencoat Uk Wind was 129p.Greencoat Uk Wind currently has 2,269,243,264 shares in issue. The market capitalisation of Greencoat Uk Wind is £2,909,169,864. Greencoat Uk Wind has a price to earnings ratio (PE ratio) of 23.06. This morning UKW shares opened at 129p |
Posted at 12/12/2024 21:48 by marktime1231 Healthy response from the UKW share price this afternoon, in contrast to others in the renewables sector. |
Posted at 10/12/2024 22:06 by marktime1231 Interesting. It means the manager shares the pain of investors when the share price is discounted to NAV. Clips the cost of fees. How does it change the manager behaviour though? It would remove commercial pressure on the manager to maintain an unrealistically inflated NAV. If that is what they were doing.Will it improve NAV or sp? Might it incentivise asset realisation eg sales at anything above the discounted NAV level? Makes it harder for the manager to turn down a fair offer perhaps, rebalancing priorities between short term recovery and long term prospects? Does it alter an attitude to maintain a barely sustainable dividend? If that was what they were doing - presumably no because thngs like distribution and buybacks are board policy not asset management decisions. It feels like it increases the chance of the trust selling up at a price somewhere between market and book. Or courting offers at such a level but rejecting them as a validation to continue? Edit - actually that last scenario would be the win win. The manager eliciting an external portfolio sale at say 145p but rejecting it saying that would be valuing the assets and long term earning potential too cheaply. So the share price recovers and the income stream continues. Although which scenario still requires UKW to demonstrate the dividend is and will continue to be covered by real cash income, something they failed to satisfy with the October update. |
Posted at 20/11/2024 12:08 by marktime1231 UKW share price has sunk well below the floor price at which I was going to add again. But I am holding off, the sneaky opaque quarterly update in October has shaken my trust. Not going to add to my holdings until there is a transparent report to confirm good health. |
Posted at 24/10/2024 15:31 by marktime1231 Well hmmph!Who puts out a routine update rns at 1pm, I mean why would you. And why not include a summary of NAV movement in the rns instead of hiding it in a factsheet on the website - especially as the factsheet is NOT on the website as claimed. No comment at all on trading or generation, wind conditions etc! An income stock providing a trading update without mentioning income or trading performance. Aaaaaaaaagh! Is it because the 2.5p sustained dividend was not covered by income in the period, does that explain the small drop in NAV? Or does the £14.25M acquisition from available cash suggest there was (would have been) a small surplus? Sorry for speculating and worrying but if everything is plain and simple and nothing to worry about why not tell us in the rns you plonkers. Debt seems well managed, refinanced for longer with just a tiny rise in average cost to 4.68%, ought to be a signal that gearing is affordable. So why headline that UKW are actively pursuing selected disposal opportunities to reduce gearing? At the same time as making a small acquisition. No comment at all on the current buyback nor the persistent share price discount to NAV, other than the oblique comment that a disposal would enable capital returns. Oh how frustrating, what an infuriating way to treat interested investors, no wonder there is a lack of market confidence in the share price 2p knocked off since the rns. Damn and blast. |
Posted at 18/10/2024 15:39 by marktime1231 No desire to get drawn in to another debate about the pros and cons of buybacks, whether the current programme is sufficient or is making any difference etc.UKW has made it clear it has under active review the relative strategic value of debt management, expansion and buybacks when deciding how to deploy cash surplus to its splendid dividend commitment. Always evaluating potential acquisitions. In seeking the right balance it is aware it is under an obligation to support the share price when the discount to NAV widens beyond 10%. At 135p the discount is about 15%. While the share price languishes under 145p I expect the board will want to continue to support the share price with limited buybacks. I would be equally content if it could expand UKW assets and income generation at a similar discount to NAV. For whatever reason the share price is trading in unloved territory, much lower and I will be buying again. |
Posted at 11/9/2024 12:06 by marktime1231 The windy season has arrived early this year. Blowing strongly enough from the second half of August for ESO to rack up record levels of curtailment costs in recent weeks. Clearly their base plan did not anticipate so much wind generation. A double plus today with solar contributing too.And yet the wind generation available has not been overwhelming, so I wonder why it has not all been used in favour of gas, biomass and imports. In addition to the argument that some renewable generation is in places which the grid network cannot handle easily, is it possible that for some assets it is cheaper to import or burn gas rather than consume homegrown renewable energy? Or is it ESO being lazy and inefficient? Can't be doing the battery storage sector much good. UKW share price continues to tread water, waiting for not sure what, but my guess is we are at last going to get a trading report which is above budget and the resulting surplus cash flow will be very welcome. |
Posted at 15/11/2023 12:50 by marktime1231 The standing charges are awful as you say, the electricity one really jumped didn't it. They punish households for being energy efficient. Also set via an OFGEM cap. I think they are supposed to pay for the development of infrastructure, and so on. But the more which goes on the standing charge the less competitive the market is via tariffs.The wholesale system is not working, all the retail challengers have gone bust. No wonder the govt are looking at market reforms via the REMA consultation which, as nickrl and others have warned, may dent UKWs earnings outlook and NAV. I vote we abolish OFGEM, an expensive shambles. Great response from UKW share price to news that UK CPI is plunging, the chance of a return to 160p in the next few months is looking reasonable. On the other hand it means yield here has dropped under 6% and looks relatively pedestrian. The snap buyback has probably helped the share price recovery but with the discount back in single figures the case for it has diminshed. |
Posted at 26/7/2023 11:55 by marktime1231 Hard to disagree with fund manager Stephen Lilley. The ability of UKW to progress dividend with inflation is assured because of the index-linked price of wind energy. The discount to NAV in the current UKW share price is unreasonable, and the way to respond to that is to buy more.He needs to convince those long-term investment institutions currently run to cash or bonds that the level of gearing is not a problem. UKW is solid so long as the wind blows, the ESO doesn't curtail wind farm output in favour of cheaper imports, and Greencoat don't get tempted in to risky or troubled developments. If we flirt with 140p again I will be happy to add some more. |
Posted at 18/11/2022 17:29 by marktime1231 Strong finish UKW share price back to about par with NAV.Good to see wind power continuing to contribute strongly to the generation mix, allowing net export to Europe. UKW operating performance might be ahead of budget in the months before the Electricity Generator Levy, a supertax on super-profits which sounds better than Rees-Mogg's cost-plus-revenue idea. So we already had a £6.6B energy efficiency budget to 2025. Who knew? A future extension of £6B to come, and an Energy Efficiency Taskforce / csar to deliver 15% demand reduction from buildings (mostly the government's own?) and industry (we still have some?). Reducing average or peak demand by about 5GW by 2030. Well at least with a target and someone in charge of delivering it there is a chance of progress, but this sounds different from subsidising domestic insulation and heat pumps. Not too sure why the govt are targetting demand reduction though, we the consumers have all already done our bit and more with home and appliance improvements, rooftop solar etc. Average intermittent renewable generation will grow around a third or 10GW by 2030, we will have an increasing surplus when the wind blows and the sun shines. Just as well, the rise of EVs means an overall demand increase of around 10%. I imagine demand will rise further with supply, otherwise the new wave of generators will be in trouble. There will certainly be new demand for air conditioning with more Summers like this one. I would like to have heard more about the "security" bit of the govt priority of delivering energy security. More than investing in Sizewell C to replace old nuclear. So what then ... not more interconnectors surely. No mention of new hydro or battery storage that I heard. Maybe we need to hear from an Energy Minister (who is?) rather than the Treasury. |
Posted at 30/9/2022 17:13 by marktime1231 Blowing a gale can't be bad for business. Surprised UKW share price hasn't recovered to NAV which must be up around 156p as we end Q3? Already fully invested way back but I agree this is cheap at the moment for anyone looking to top up. |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions
Hot Features
Premium
