We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Goldplat Plc | LSE:GDP | London | Ordinary Share | GB00B0HCWM45 | ORD 1P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.00 | 0.00% | 7.95 | 7.80 | 8.10 | - | 0.00 | 01:00:00 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gold Ores | 41.88M | 2.8M | 0.0167 | 4.76 | 13.34M |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
05/4/2017 22:28 | YORGI BANS PEOPLE FROM THE OTHER THREAD IF YOU POST UP ANYTHING CONTRARIAN.ALL POSTERS DONT BOTHER POSTING UP ANYTHING, WASTE OF TIME. | discodave4 | |
05/4/2017 22:27 | YORGI BANS PEOPLE FROM THE OTHER THREAD IF YOU POST UP ANYTHING CONTRARIAN.ALL POSTERS DONT BOTHER POSTING UP ANYTHING, WASTE OF TIME. | discodave4 | |
05/4/2017 22:12 | Sorry yorgi but that is no excuse, as moderator if you could not remove both posts you should not have removed any. I posted exactly the same as mrmoneybags yet you chose to remove mine.I am still free to post on this board and I will continue to do so.I stand by what I said and your biased actions are further proof that this is indeed the worst stock thread on ADVFN.DD | discodave4 | |
05/4/2017 22:00 | "My view was that the share price was not moving after the RR issue was announced, fact is it didn't."Fact is, it did. Anyone who acted on your negativity and sold at 5.25p has lost out. Have humility. There is little wrong with this board. Your opposing view was well aired here, but wrong.Best wishesWw | wigwammer | |
05/4/2017 21:58 | If this is the worst BB on ADVFN then I wonder why you would want to post here DiscoDave. I can only assume and it is only a guess that Mrmoneybags "Yawn" was directed at you but I could of course be wrong. However if he was not a subscriber I would have moderated it as it adds nothing to any debate about GDP. That is why your "yawn" posts were moderated. | yorgi | |
05/4/2017 21:55 | Well I will change the subject and witter about Kili for a bit while Man City are going down to Chelsea. Stage 1 was completed in February. A 200tpd mill has been installed but only 60tpd can be processed due to a limited CIL capacity The financial effect is that a £700k financial loss pa has been improved to break even. This plant will produce 2,300ozs pa from 60tpd which implies a grade of 3.2g/t. Average grade at Kili is 2.4g/t. Stage 2 is due to be commissioned in April This removes the CIL constraints and a crusher is constructed. This stage is said to produce at a rate of 2,200ozs from an additional 60tpd, making 120tpd in total. This should produce a better financial result than stage 1 due to economies. Stage 3 no date as yet but VSA expect in H1/18 This stage will construct another mill bringing capacity to 400tpd. The various constraints mean an additional 80tpd will be added to processing capacity. The financial effect will be to bring an additional production of 2,200ozs for a total of 6,600 from stages 1-3. The financial effect of stage 3 will be £1m. The old processing will be kept going as long as tailings capacity exists. There are alternatives for extensions and alternative sites. The financial effect of stages 1-3, when added to the old plant, will be pbt of about £2.5m. | kimboy2 | |
05/4/2017 21:48 | Apparently even if I post "yawn" too it gets moderated.Says it all, this is the worst board on ADVFN. | discodave4 | |
05/4/2017 20:44 | PogI agree.The simple truth is some posters on here will not accept any contrarian views no matter what. If you post your honest opinion and if not aligned with the majority who regularly post on here you get an immediate aggressive response dismissing your views out of hand.DD | discodave4 | |
05/4/2017 20:35 | ps wig, post up where I said that I predicted the RR issue. Just like KB2 you keep making things up. | discodave4 | |
05/4/2017 20:34 | WigMy view was that the share price was not moving after the RR issue was announced, fact is it didn't. You and nobody else here accepted that view. You still don't despite even the BoD saying the same thing. If you want to keep making an issue out of it, feel free but I will still keep posting the same reply.All the best.DD | discodave4 | |
05/4/2017 18:44 | DD You are trying to rewrite history.You did not predict the RR issue, and your contention was that the shares would not rise from the 5.25p post RR slump until the issue was resolved.With the shares now 40%+ above that level, having been as high as 60% above it, you have been proven wrong. Yes, we will see where the shares go from here, but your opinion has not been a very prescient one so far.Ww | wigwammer | |
05/4/2017 18:42 | DD, KB et al, isn´t your argument just semantics and different starting points. Clearly I think we all agree that the RR dispute is negative although we have different views on how much it affects GDP. I also think that we all agree that there is an increased risk in GDP until this has been settled and the relation with RR has been clarified. Please post when you have info that adds value. Your current "fight" only clogs the BB. | pog1234 | |
05/4/2017 18:35 | Already the downward pressure is building tomorrow should see a big fall Off for lunch now ,,,,have a great day lolololololol.oloo | danielmiller1 | |
05/4/2017 18:31 | Oh boy oh boy oh boy The cats are really out now no holds barred. Dan is please to be here and no longer involved with petty squabbles. However Dan will say this......I am great.y entertained by the action it's all good fun.BUT and please pay attention my little representative peasantry.....those buying today will be crying tomorrow. The realisation of what this litigation will cost GDP has no sunk in yet......It is possibly it will cripple the company which is already committed to a high interest loan note! Lolololololololololo IT GET FUNNIER BY THE MOMENT! | danielmiller1 | |
05/4/2017 18:22 | The BoD clearly stated that the RR had put a cap on the share price, I agree and made that point numerous times.Why don't you email Gerard and ask him for clarification.DD | discodave4 | |
05/4/2017 18:17 | Did I say that KB2? | discodave4 | |
05/4/2017 17:58 | If the proposition is that the share price won't rise, no matter how much profit GDP makes, so long as the RR dispute is unsolved then it is clearly absurd. If the proposition is that profit won't rise as long as RR is unresolved then I think Q3/17 will disprove it, ignoring that H1/17 already did disprove it. | kimboy2 | |
05/4/2017 17:47 | WigYour just repeating. Have already answered your points.The price now is 7.38, pre RR news it was 7. Lets see what happens next.DD | discodave4 | |
05/4/2017 16:27 | DdYour contention was that the shares would go nowhere until the RR issue was resolved. It remains unresolved. Yet the share has broken multiple multi year highs and remains +40% from where the RR news broke.I wish all my shares were "capped" in this way.Best wishes with your investments. Ww | wigwammer | |
05/4/2017 16:23 | Yorgi - pm me and explain why you keep moderating my posts. | discodave4 |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions