Goldplat Share Discussion Threads

[danielmiller1] 15/3/2017 10:56

give up up oh Great Stupid One.

Its nicely up today....but it wont hold on to the gains....watch!

[sea7] 14/3/2017 16:37

small sell at the end of the day, pulled the share price back a bit, however, still up on the day, as sterling under pressure, gold slightly up in dollars and marginally up in rand.

[danielmiller1] 14/3/2017 15:16

Loblolly loll


This is where you fall brown ever so badly Stupid One.......you know you must look under the carpet for real info and you know that the source can never be published.

Dan always goes further in his research.

I can prove the first two pinpoints you raise and with documented evidence from highly credible sources!

Why the hell do you think I said it in the first place.

[sea7] 13/3/2017 18:01

Miller you have made so many claims and backed up none of them

One claim you made was that Ian visagie has a holding in the company, please provide a link to the actual rns or documentation backing that up.

You claimed that the company had stolen feedstock, so provide documentary evidence in the form of a link to it.

That's just two of the many outlandish claims you have made on these threads, so back them up.

You have also claimed to have evidence of wrongdoing at the company, yet refuse to substantiate your claims.

Do so or give it a rest.

[danielmiller1] 13/3/2017 17:15

What claims would they be oh great stupid one name what you would like me support

[sea7] 13/3/2017 14:47

I posted up all supporting evidence to any factual claims I have made. The rest is assessment and opinion.

Perhaps you would like to back up your claims. Oh wait a minute, you can't.

[danielmiller1] 13/3/2017 14:31

yep sure is the proof is clear you LIE

AND DESPITE ALL REQUESTS TO PROVE WHAT YOU POST......ALL YOU CAN DO IS TOO DUCK AND IVE.....YOU REALLY ARE A PATHETIC SPECIMEN.

LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

[sea7] 13/3/2017 11:03

Miller, my view on goldplat has been the same over the last ten years and that is that they have a durable business, that can continue indefinitely as long as mining continues in its current form. The nature of the business is that there are fairly high barriers to entry and unlike traditional mining the recovery ops are not geographically constrained, which gives it a competitive advantage over a traditional miner.

The fact that they have faced issues and have made a lot of mistakes hasn't altered that view point, however, I do take the market sentiment into consideration when positioning.

You only registered for a free account on advfn in June 2010 and only showed up here around 2011. This means that you have not read any of my posts pre 2011 and therefore are making a baseless assumption on my view on this company.

[danielmiller1] 13/3/2017 10:51

But stupid one in between doing other things I really enjoy winding you up. And botboy is hilarious he has more rattles than the snake.lololololololololololol

And it's 7 years since you have taken your defensive position

[sea7] 13/3/2017 09:37

Ten years miller, ten years, not seven as you incorrectly point out.

I have held a position in goldplat of varying sizes continually for the last ten years, with exception of late 2012 to late 2013, when I sold at 14p and then waited just over a year, before beginning to build a new position when the stock went below 7.75p. I continued buying all the way down to 1.75p and then carried on buying as the stock still represented good value at under 5p at that time. In hindsight I was about a year early, however, never mind.

I did have an average of 4.45p, however, it is considerably less now, to the point its effectively a free carry.

Whilst I have been accumulating and managing my holdings accordingly, you have been ranting all the while. I took no notice of you, which is just as well. Perhaps you should be honest with yourself miller and decide whether or not it would be a better use of your time, to research a stock and invest rather than rant on a bulletin board about a stock you no longer hold a position in.

[danielmiller1] 13/3/2017 09:15

Amazing but nevertheless true to the natural genetic inheritance which demands that in time of conflict ...RATS SLWAYS TURN UPON THEMSELVES.

I would disregard the stupid one's comments on the advancement of the share price as its the same old record he plays for the past 7 years

[sea7] 13/3/2017 09:02

Tks for kind comments DD and Shareholder.

I have primarily invested in aim companies for the last ten years. I am under no illusion as to the wild swings, contradictory statements, sudden changes of direction,
banana skins, delays and any other curve balls that aim can suddenly drop on you at any moment.


This market acts more like a casino than anything else in my view. It is extremely important that the numbers stack up, otherwise the crushing of the stock is relentless and sometimes never recovers, as a lot of aim stocks do not have the institutional support that larger, more well known entities have and cannot access debt markets so readily.

Goldplat has got a good product and I can see that it can carry on indefinitely. As long as there is gold mining, there is waste and goldplat is there for that.

They have managed to make a mess of it at the top in goldplat over the years, whilst the guys on the ground have continued to keep the business going on a daily basis.

Robert Pitts Smith was managing director at the recovery plants, was welcomed to the board of directors in july 2011 and Hansie was taken on and took over as managing director for the recovery ops. Robert smith retired in December 2013 and Hansie took his board seat as Chief ops officer, responsible for recovery ops.

Ian took over as CEO and in my view that was more to do with having a CEO and someone to sign off on things, rather than his ability to run the company. Not much
happened under his tenure as CEO and it looks as though he just kept things ticking over as they were until a replacement could be found.

Bob smith rejoined goldplat as a consultant not that long ago.

bob profile...



In my view they asked bob to come back to provide support as the company was going through a tough time and his knowledge of the organisation and probably contacts would help get the company through some dark days. Whilst he may not have directly been involved in the setting up of contracts, as they have sourcing teams for that, he will have still been aware of the impact lower gold prices will have had, however his knowledge of goldplat will have overridden this point, to offer him a consultancy to help out. He will be 70 next year.

Hansie may one day be CEO as well, as he was asked about that some time ago and he said that he was not ready for that seat just yet. A few years have passed now and as the chairs role has been filled, I think Gerard will be in the CEO role for a few more years yet.

The numbers will bear out the fruits of their labour and will underpin the shareprice, however, it will be the trust in the board of directors ability to move the company forward which will determine whether or not we get a higher share price sooner rather than later.

[discodave4] 12/3/2017 18:34

Yep shareholder, agree, S7 one of the best on here and has a balanced view and is always polite with it.KB2 on the other hand is arrogant, condescending and a complete hypocrite......and I'm being fairly polite!.Is not in the real world, it's not just about the numbers ffs.Glad your softcat worked out (assuming it did). Did like the look of them but never bought.Good luck.

[shareholder7] 12/3/2017 18:19

DD I think it is only KB2 that does not get it, Sea7 is very balanced The two mad man ( same guy imv) would be funny if they were not so rude, so I think we are making progressThis was my first investment in AIM and I will think very carefully about reentering It's great to be able to trade £50k in Softcat without moving the price KB2 must be a worried man and must be worth a lot as if you need to get £250k out of GDP tomorrow, it would push the share price downThe last major purchase form an institution of £1m was Fidelity when Demetri sold at 9p They are still £400k down

[discodave4] 12/3/2017 18:19

That's a cheap and hypocritical post KB2, particularly after your constant insistence that posters should always support their posts with facts, so post up as requested where you get:"They have not changed the terms of any current contracts. They have changed the terms of future contracts from the standard of the past".IMO it's all in your mind and complete make believe, as other things you keep posting on here, particularly with regards to RR.

[kimboy2] 12/3/2017 18:07

I will leave you all to it. The numbers will tell the story, as always.

[danielmiller1] 12/3/2017 17:54

Well again you fell for it stupid lololololololololololololololo

No need to say more.

Lolololololololo

[discodave4] 12/3/2017 17:48

Sorry shareholder you posted up as I was typing, thanks for your support, as ever though it's a waste of time trying to post up any contrarian views on here.KB2 - you need to look up what a contract is, by definition it's a legally binding agreement - in other words its current and it should be so water tight that nothing within it can be changed by either party. Clearly GDP's contracts are not worth the paper they are printed on if a client can change payment terms - GDP didn't change the terms, their CLIENT RR did.......unbelievable!.