Fevertree Drinks Share Discussion Threads

[wetdream] 25/7/2017 07:47

Yup, excellent product range & management.
Very enlightening Youtube interview with Rolls, although sound quality of non-miked speakers is poor.
Just depends how much of this performance is already in the share price

[gersemi] 25/7/2017 07:28

It's still sat on a pe of 100+ or thereabouts but when you're driving diluted EPS at such a phenomenal rate (100%+ annually) one would assume it's a justified rating and no doubt the stock may continue to outperform but as with all lofty ratings the stock will be prone any blip in the company's trading..

it's not such a stonking buy as it once was so worth taking some stock off the table and maintaining a core holding ....but what an exceptional company this is

[themaker] 25/7/2017 07:23

this trading update has all but wiped out the full year consensus broker estimates in one half. Great to see a slight acceleration in revenues how many 77% growth companies are out there?? Eps through the roof.

[grabster] 25/7/2017 07:23

Earlier this month at Goodwood Festival Of Speed event:

"As for Fever Tree – I practically had to fight my way to their gin and tonic tour. A two-story stand with gin mixing magic, crowd bursting queues and friendly faced folk. Fever Tree was undoubtedly the party everyone wanted to be at both online and off.."
".. By being relevant with their brand amplification, McLaren, Fever Tree and Porsche will have outstripped their stuffy peers and with it they’ll have opened up a new set of fans and a wider set of future customers. That’s brand building 101, and it’s a lesson brand managers need to take on board. A brand that excludes may be exclusive, but it’s a brand that’s dead."

[multibagger] 25/7/2017 07:20

Unbelievable results - really stunning :)

[funkmasterp12] 25/7/2017 07:08

It's why the PE is so sky high but so are the sales!!

[funkmasterp12] 25/7/2017 07:04

'Materially ahead' - I'll take that!!

[wetdream] 24/7/2017 17:55

Looking good.

[martywidget] 20/7/2017 16:35

post #1 has useful links:



Investor relations:


in header

A charge applies for each additional change to the header, of a pack of 4 Fever-Tree Premium Ginger Beer for each additional changes. ;)

[grabster] 20/7/2017 16:30

It would be useful to have a link to the company website in the header please.

[grabster] 20/7/2017 16:27

It would be useful to have a link to the company website in the header please.

[martywidget] 20/7/2017 15:42

A green tea is okay, as long as it is a quality green tea. Some contain too much fluoride, could be bad for health & perhaps also not good for the pineal gland.

[Actually, if your into healthy drinks, perhaps try raw organic cacao drinking chocloate - apparently good for the pineal gland and intuition, perhaps helps some people become better stock pickers].

...Right, I'm just off to have another raw organic cacao drinking chocloate!

[martywidget] 20/7/2017 10:30

[To the shorts], is yours a short or a double...?

[villarich] 19/7/2017 20:04

Closing at a new 52 week high on high volume bodes well in the run up to results.

[bamboo2] 19/7/2017 15:24

I prefer the sobriety of Marty's thread. :-)

Not one potential turn, but three for tomorrow.
Price just fallen short of prior INVH&S tp of 1800 today, but 1790 good enough for me.

[sogoesit] 19/7/2017 13:44

I thought we (chartist idiots) were on this thread and yours was the voice of sanity and reason...
Has that changed ;-) ?

[martywidget] 19/7/2017 12:52

I put that on my original/alternative FEVR thread yesterday as no one had posted it/hardly seen it (only 6 youtube views up until yesterday evening), but hey, the fewer idiots that look at that thread the better.

[wetdream] 19/7/2017 12:39

Apologies if already posted, but well worth the time to listen to Charles Rolls.



Thanks to the original poster on the LSE website.

[sogoesit] 19/7/2017 11:45

Good clarity Doctor but the rules, in the instance of "market size", aren't "stupid".

They follow the normal commercial logic of pricing to volume. If normal trade sizes are in the 100's and you put an order in for 1,000 you're not going to be bid/offered the same price as for 100. Some orders can take a few hours, at least, to "work".

Agree that reporting rules are a bit strange but also Buy/Sell reports in general follow an algorithm around the mid-point of the Bid/Offer spread, as I understand it. Deducing the Buy/Sell volume differential is therefore a waste of time especially if based on a victim's narrative of "mm's conspiracies".

[martywidget] 19/7/2017 11:40

Re christh 18 Jul '17 - 17:56 - 745 ;


Rules of the London Stock Exchange
Rule Book 13 March 2017


LSE SETS Hidden Order Enhancements


SETS


switch to more enlightened trading - A guide to Level 2 market data


Direct Market Access


A guide to London Stock Exchange trading services for equity securities



etc.

[doctor 69] 19/7/2017 10:52

CHRISTH

It is not cheating it is sadly the stupid rules. for example if you buy larger than market size then the mm are allowed to delay announcing the trade and the rules vary , but say then can delay 1 hr , then if the buy was at 1710 and an hour later the mid price is 1715 then the trade is presented as a sell. this is how life is . similar if the trade is really big like 1 million it can be delayed for a day and the price will be totally different then.

also if mid price is 1710 and you buy at 1709 , it will be presented as a sell even though it is a buy

hope this helps

[christh] 18/7/2017 17:56

Doctor 69 18 Jul '17 - 16:32 - 742 of 744
N can never tell whether selling is more than buys , what is registered as a sell in a share moving up is often a buy

That is not fair to investors, shareholders.
There is no tresparency, it's cheating.
If the market makers are not playing fair then the FCA has to straighten that up.