ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for discussion Register to chat with like-minded investors on our interactive forums.

EVG Evgen Pharma Plc

0.80
0.00 (0.00%)
25 Apr 2024 - Closed
Delayed by 15 minutes
Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Evgen Pharma Plc LSE:EVG London Ordinary Share GB00BSVYN304 ORD 0.25P
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  0.00 0.00% 0.80 0.75 0.85 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.00 08:00:00
Industry Sector Turnover Profit EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap
Pharmaceutical Preparations 422k -4.04M -0.0147 -0.54 2.2M
Evgen Pharma Plc is listed in the Pharmaceutical Preparations sector of the London Stock Exchange with ticker EVG. The last closing price for Evgen Pharma was 0.80p. Over the last year, Evgen Pharma shares have traded in a share price range of 0.75p to 4.05p.

Evgen Pharma currently has 274,888,117 shares in issue. The market capitalisation of Evgen Pharma is £2.20 million. Evgen Pharma has a price to earnings ratio (PE ratio) of -0.54.

Evgen Pharma Share Discussion Threads

Showing 1026 to 1048 of 13025 messages
Chat Pages: Latest  53  52  51  50  49  48  47  46  45  44  43  42  Older
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
20/3/2019
20:38
Timbo003
Just to let you know the breast cancer treatment is no longer a tablet it is now in powder form in a capsule, this was to make it more tolerable.

Longterm.
I’m on first line treatment for MBC. I was given tamoxifen in 2015 for BC , diagnosed with MBC last May , on trial with tamoxifen... no progression since June last year, so I don’t class myself as a salvage treatment as lots of other options when this stops working.

I believe that if this drug had been given to me in 2015 with tamoxifen I may not now have MBC IMO, fingers crossed for next week 😀😀

blakeysangel
20/3/2019
17:05
>> s_k

Completely agree. The chart says there is a lovely bowl about to be formed with the top at 25p!

PS great to hear from you!

nobbygnome
20/3/2019
16:09
100k rollover
dave444
20/3/2019
16:03
22.5p mid is a good daily result
dave444
20/3/2019
16:01
Only one left on 22p offer
dave444
20/3/2019
15:53
Motoring along nicely - will £1/share be blown apart on news?
dave444
20/3/2019
15:19
30p+ pre-news hopefully.
soultrading
20/3/2019
15:14
25p is the natural point for this to rise to pre news.
sicilian_kan
20/3/2019
14:51
Only one MM left on the 19p offer.....
nobbygnome
19/3/2019
13:29
Apfindley: Wasn’t the 100p price target specified by the previous NOMAD firm, therefore pretty much a marketing exercise rather than an unbiased forecast. I’d love to be proved wrong here so don’t get me wrong!
ardinno
19/3/2019
13:25
Finncap are aggressively on the bid well above the other MMs so I suspect there may be a few large buy orders in the background
nobbygnome
19/3/2019
09:43
>> timbo

Thanks for that information. I don't think I had heard that before and it makes perfect sense. Nevertheless it must still be a possibility that one company would license the drug lock stock and barrel!

nobbygnome
19/3/2019
09:42
In my opinion there is no doubt it would work better in earlier patients; I think that is probably true of just about all cancer drugs.

However, EVG have stated previously that the most sensible approach is to go for patients who have failed previous drugs as going head to head with the giants is very difficult. Of course your commercial strategy is vital as it will decide how you design the clinical trials.

nobbygnome
19/3/2019
09:23
Thanks.. I would assume then that if sfx works well with a Pfizer treatment then Pfizer will be interested. As it has the potential to expand the duration of Pfizer's other treatments as well.As this trial is at the extreme end of treatment (salvage), I am also curious if you have anyfurthet thoughts on whether the treatment could be used sooner. Fully appreciate that results etc. Have not been shared but do you have any thoughts on this Nobby?
l0ngterm
19/3/2019
09:21
>>>Nobby

I think Evgen have been quite smart on addressing that question for the two current indications under investigation, as they have different dosage forms for each indication. For SAH, the drug is in capsule form (which can be dispersed in saline or water for administration via a naso-gastric tube) and they use tablets for breast cancer. So it would be quite simple to go for a different partner for each indication, although I am not too sure they could justify yet more different dosage forms for additional indications beyond the original two.

timbo003
19/3/2019
09:14
From memory Pfizer have most of the drugs for this indication. Drug companies like to have a complete package to provide doctors with a suite of drugs for one particular disease and I remember saying previously Pfizer appeared to be the perfect partner.
nobbygnome
19/3/2019
09:09
I would imagine the company would be taken over before then. I am keen to see if SFX 01 in the breast cancer trial works with one or more hormone treatments. Not sure if you know what pharma supplies which hormone treatment?
l0ngterm
19/3/2019
08:26
I wonder if EVG will license SFX-01 just for breast cancer or for all indications to the same company. As well as SAH there could be multiple other indications such as MS. A good dilemma to have....
nobbygnome
19/3/2019
08:19
They already had a price target here starting at something around 100p.So certainly looking good now with the encouraging results coming in.
apfindley
19/3/2019
08:09
The share price here could explode upwards. Everything seems to sound very positive indeed.
soultrading
18/3/2019
11:11
mirako - not necessarily - the whole FDA accelerated approval pathway was set up to use surrogate endpoints eg biomarkers. I'm not sure how that position will change with Gottlieb moving, but I think accelerated approval is a very attractive option for a company like Evgen and they should be looking at it very closely.
supernumerary
18/3/2019
10:43
The primary endpoint in this trial is a biomarker and the FDA will surely want evidence of clinical benefit.
mirako
18/3/2019
10:39
It's clearly the correct thing to do, and as Nobby says, surprising that it wasn't always the case.

I'm also curious about why they seem to be planning to make the current secondary endpoints into the primary endpoints in the next trial. If they get to the next phase it will be because they've succeeded in this one, so why change a winning formula?

supernumerary
Chat Pages: Latest  53  52  51  50  49  48  47  46  45  44  43  42  Older

Your Recent History

Delayed Upgrade Clock