Eqtec Share Discussion Threads

[gottopickapocketortwo] 01/9/2020 10:27

Interestingly halfpenny's were discontinued in 1984

[juju44] 01/9/2020 10:23

Yea , placing profitters have finished

[rogerramjett] 01/9/2020 09:59

Nice little move up this morning. Buying pressure is there. Tempted to take a small amount to take me to a nice round figure.

[jakecat1] 31/8/2020 21:41

Other than the last three lines... absolute tosh.

[halfpenny] 31/8/2020 11:50

Great thats the last of Roger the Dodger! So he says but do you believe him???

[rogerramjett] 31/8/2020 10:49

Halfpenny. Final word from me to you on this.

EQT are defending this with 'prior art' gasifiers, with evidence of their existence prior to the patent application date of the procures patents that Aries claim to have.

If this is not deemed enough evidence then the EQT gasifiers are clearly not infringement as they will be different tech and therefore the claim will be irrelevant.

If you cannot be bothered to read my posts with the attached links which explains the defense or 'counter claim' of EQT then you really should not be giving warnings to investors regarding share price movement.

Only a few weeks ago you claimed that this would be 2p. You must be bi-polar.

I am going to enjoy the sunshine and time with the family. I suggest you give your thumb a break from sucking it today and get an early night tonight. School starts this week. Don't want to be late for the first day back.

[halfpenny] 31/8/2020 10:26

EQT need to comply else they will be in a difficult position not defending Claim . Roger the Dodger hasn't got a clue ... be aware EQT very Risky. Shares will reflect this from tomorrow, Sept will be a very difficult month without Legal Claim update. Still very very Risky...

[rogerramjett] 31/8/2020 09:25

No.

EQT do not need to argue that their solution is better. Prior art has nothing to do with being better it has only to do with being available prior to the so called Aries patent technology.

EQT are not looking for 'prior art' they have prior art gasifiers available well before Aries. This is evidenced online. Even the court filings from Aries have a picture of one of the prior art gasifiers from a project which predates the Aries so called patent. It is Aries that needed to look for 'prior art gasification' prior to application of patent. Had they done this they would realise that their tech is not 'novel'. That is their failure. Poor research. In fact, Aries didn't even make the application or develop the tech for the patent, they bought them.

Alternative solutions are also not a problem. If EQT and Aries provide alternative solutions to gasification then they are different techs and are not infringing on patents. Therefore irrelevant. If they are the same then EQT have 'prior art'.

You really are showing your lack of understanding and have lost all credibility. Again, not supported by evidence, just the ramblings of an uneducated fool.

Do us all a favour halfwit and provide some supported posts and present your argument. Perhaps then you may be taken seriously.

No one has ever said that EQT is not a risk. Its always a risk, it is AIM. Not that AIM has anything to do with patent infringement claims. EQT have been the target of 'opportunistic' threats of legal action and unfortunately they have to deal with it. My posts detail with evidence their defence case whilst yours are just ramblings of doom and gloom and negativity to try and change investor sentiment to benefit your underwater short position.

Beware of halfpenny and their motives. They are also an opportunitic chancer, hell bent on making anything remotely non positive seem like the biggest catastrophe ever.

[parob] 31/8/2020 08:40

hTTps://twitter.com/eqtec/status/1298531028919885825?s=21FINANCIAL CLOSE & SIGNING OF CONTRACT WITH EWERGY"The collaboration is working that well with ewerGy, that the pipeline of around 10 projects at the time of signing the collaboration framework agreement in March, is now 22 identified projects in less than 6 months"

[halfpenny] 31/8/2020 08:34

EQR needs to resolve the Legal Claim. Note: While looking for prior art, EQT should have looked for competing art. These are ideas that may not be at all like EQT’s but do the same job.
Most inventions are a solution to a problem, and most problems have more than one possible solution. EQT need to examine other solutions, and get Legal approval.
As EQT try to exploit their idea commercially, alternative solutions may be strong competition. This is why there is a Claim against EQT. EQT need to argue successfully that their solution is better than alternatives, EQT need to know what the alternatives are! This can be a very very expensive process. Can we see the proof that they have done this???? A legal statement is important to provide clarification where EQT stand. We still have a huge Risk with EQT and need a clear Legal statement to defend against the Legal Claim by a USA company...There Is a Risk of further Claims by other Companies!!!

[halfpenny] 30/8/2020 22:50

Wot a load if Rubbish by Roger the Dodger!! He avoids the fact that there is still The Legal Claim which still holds and we need answers from the EQT Legal team on this Risky situation. EQT need to provide a clear Updated statement about the Claim. EQT is still a high Risk so be aware....

[rogerramjett] 30/8/2020 19:17

to all interested share holders. I have reposted some detail regarding prior art and gasifiers used by Eqtec back in 2008.

I will not be responding to halfpenny or tenapen again.

Good luck all. I have done my due diligence and wanted to share the info with you.

I will refrain from lowering my intelligence to some on this board as named above.

Let's hope some good news filters through regarding non US contracts soon and the US claim is resolved.



Have a good Bank Holiday Monday.

[rogerramjett] 30/8/2020 19:14

Another article proving prior art gasifiers used by Eqtec in 2008

[rogerramjett] 30/8/2020 19:13

Movialsa used the Eqtec gasifier in 2011 after a sales agreement for it as far back as 2008.

'The Movialsa biomass gasification plant (pictured) opened in 2011. It is located just under two hours south of Madrid in the Ciudad Real province of Spain'

'Prior art'

www.proactiveinvestors.co.uk/companies/news/220858/eqtec-primed-to-become-one-stop-shop-for-waste-to-energy-projects-220858.html

[rogerramjett] 30/8/2020 19:11

Explanation of prior art

[rogerramjett] 30/8/2020 19:10

Expecting news from Billingham shortly and possibly further announcements in respect of the remaining 21 sites mentioned as part of the agreement.

Things are looking very attractive for EQT who are currently valued at roughly 1/3 of PHE. PHE yet to really get started and generate meaningful revenues. Albeit different tech with a different end product.

The EQT correction is possibly underway breaking away from the 0.5p area to mid 0.6p area in the last week. Expecting to see 0.8 short term and 1p within the next 4 to 6 weeks.

Billingham has the potential to be massive for EQT. Much more involvement than just a tech provider with enduring revenue for an extended period of time.

There are going to be traders in this share along the way. We know this from the incessant posting of the same details over and over again. It is always advisable to do your own research. Eqtec are countering Aries claim for patent infringement (patents picked up in a jumble sale, sorry, bankruptcy sale) and could result innl very bad news for Aries, invalidating the patents they claim to own due to them not being novel and are existing 'prior art'

For anyone that is not sure on what 'Prior art' is in relation to patents.

Prior art is any evidence that your invention is already known. Prior art does not need to exist physically or be commercially available. It is enough that someone, somewhere, sometime previously has described or shown or made something that contains a use of technology that is very similar to your invention.

In the case of Eqtec, they have demonstrated to Aries that the gasifier that they claim to have patent rights over was actually developed and built by Eqtec 8 years previous to them acquiring the patents or designs.

Eqtec have also shown that the gasification tech currently used by Aries and subject to the infringement claim is inferior to EQT's and that the tech used in North Fork is very different to that contested by Aries and therefore non infringement anyway.

Halfpenny/tenapen, instead of banging on about a law suit, what is your understanding of 'prior art' and patent law ? What is your view on this revelation in relation to the claim ? Do you think that the US partner for the projects did not do their research and due diligence on Eqtec and Aries before making a decision to use our gasification equipment ? What does that tell you about the whole situation ? What is your perspective on that considering that Aries may be a bunch of chancers and this is more likely sour grapes ?

Do you not think that the market is aware of this and yes it hangs over Eqtec but it is already reflected in the undervalued share price and MCap ?

Please choose your answers carefully or you may end up loosing more credibility than you already have. Intelligent answer only please

[rogerramjett] 30/8/2020 16:49

Halfwit. Myself and marvel are not the same person.

I am yet to hear a response from you that is backed by anything at all.

When you say 'haven't got a clue' you couldn't be more wrong. The detail I have provided shows people on here exactly that 'prior art' is in play and proven by EQT.

I have also never said that this is over. But I certainly do have a clue and have presented my 'clue' to all that can read, with evidence.

What have you done ? Discredited yourself by rambling on as de-rampers tend to do.

I do hope you are short from 0.5p and this attacks 1p very quickly. Anyone that is investing can read and see the negatives with EQT. What is a disgrace is that people like you try to benefit from a negative reaction in investor sentiment. Unfortunately you do not have the intellect to counter a post other than lower the tone towards people.

I hope you can find some peace with yourself and change your outlook to a positive one someday. Must be terrible going through life with such a negative outlook

[halfpenny] 30/8/2020 16:31

Marvel Idiot who cant read and needs to go back to infant school. Roger the Dodger and Marval are the same fools who have not got a clue. Legal team need to update EQT real investors on the latest Claim position. What part of Legal Claim do these fools not understand. EQT are still Risky until a Legal position has been clearly provided.

[rogerramjett] 30/8/2020 13:55

Yep. What intellect.

Completely discredited themselves with such a poor attempt at a response.

[rogerramjett] 30/8/2020 13:45

fake qualification. You must be joking. I have provided links you nugget not to news but to articles referencing EQT tech prior to the date of the alleged infringed patents. You just cant get your little brain around it as you have no intelligence or choose not to read and listen to what is put under your nose

I have never said that it has been closed out. But I have presented facts about the law of patents and prior art and provided the evidence that contributes to proving that EQT had been using prior art gasifiers a long time before Aries bought their patents.

You have proven yourself incompetent and lost credibility, whilst my qualifications provide me with the necessary research skills required to support my point of view and address people in a professional manner. I do not need to prove that they exist, as long as my professional body and academia are aware that's good enough for me.