We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conroy Gold & Natural Resources Plc | LSE:CGNR | London | Ordinary Share | IE00BZ4BTZ13 | ORD EUR0.001 (CDI) |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.00 | 0.00% | 7.875 | 7.50 | 8.25 | 7.875 | 7.875 | 7.88 | 0.00 | 08:00:00 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gold Ores | 257k | -363k | -0.0081 | -9.72 | 3.52M |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
02/11/2015 10:23 | It wasnt me that posted you down but what is it that you want the person to present a case against? | newprom | |
02/11/2015 08:44 | Wow.....one of the true believers obviously didn't like that post.....pity he/she hasn't got the wherewithal to actually present a case against.......must be sad to be that limited imo! | thecynical1 | |
02/11/2015 08:17 | hilarious that they refer to the "conceptual nature" of the potential 15 - 20 million ounces in that presentation........ | thecynical1 | |
30/10/2015 16:27 | looks to me as though there might have to be a recap aswell along with any good news for shareholders otherwise nothing can happen because it wont have any money to pay for anything so a recapitalisation to enable a placing looks certain to me what does everyone else think ? | rbonnier | |
30/10/2015 15:00 | I've linked the 'plan' below. Have you not actually read their June 2015 Presentation? In the presentation are listed timescales, projected costs, locations, amounts of mineral, qualities of minerals etc etc all broken down into extremely easy to read words. It goes into every shred of minutiae that even the moaniest moaner from Moanington could not argue is well done. However, it would be nice - manners even - to give those of us invested for the long term some sort of update. As for the DCBs and their new usernames, thanks again for building the company for the likes of me. Have a perfectly salubrious weekend. | kevjones2 | |
30/10/2015 13:03 | newprom you are deluded. nothing is going on here, other than the company is being milked by the massive wage bill of the directors. it is just wishful thinking on your part. the market knows exactly what is happening here with the prof in charge.. how can you say it is easier to invest now? what progress has been made? what is the plan? what milestones have been hit... any new investor may as well write a cheque direct to the prof. | j0no5 | |
30/10/2015 09:39 | Craffert is right I do tend to always have a positive slant but that is only to balance what I think is an unfairly negative stance on this board.But that does not mean that there are not things I am unhappy with and some criticism is justified but only if it is balanced and fair. | newprom | |
30/10/2015 09:27 | I understand the frustrations of the shareholders.The company seems to be locking them out and not giving anything away.But the company is in a more advanced position than when the shares were much higher and there was so much more to prove,and the professor managed to convince people to invest.In comparison with then in should be much easier for people to invest now.My opinion is something is going on that the company cannot yet divulge.Weigh the risk against the reward. | newprom | |
29/10/2015 22:59 | newprom always has a positive slant ... even with zero progress and a share price now 60% below the last placing price. The least the Prof could do is suspend all fees and salaries for Directors until such time as the company is on a sounder financial footing. If this thing ends up in administration, I wonder who will be knocking the bean counters door? | craffert | |
29/10/2015 22:59 | newprom always has a positive slant ... even with zero progress and a share price now 60% below the last placing price. The least the Prof could do is suspend all fees and salaries for Directors until such time as the company is on a sounder financial footing. If this thing ends up in administration, I wonder who will be knocking the bean counters door? | craffert | |
29/10/2015 20:01 | the most ridiculous statements are those that simply disregard the facts such as the utter devastation of the share price, the lack of permits & planning permission and, as for producing revenue or, even, profits.....well that really is so many years away it is laughable. If it ever happens. | 4marlin | |
29/10/2015 18:29 | RBOnnier.Of course you know that! Hearing some ridiculous statements on here. | newprom | |
29/10/2015 13:50 | looks like its all over bar the shouting I think this years AGM is going to be difficult for the Prof as the reality that investors have lost their money sinks in . | rbonnier | |
27/10/2015 05:01 | no, if they cannot get money from you, you are low priority. I know that from personal and repeated experience. | 4marlin | |
26/10/2015 22:44 | Emailed them a couple of days ago but no response. | actybod | |
22/10/2015 23:53 | For me it has always hinged on finance/funding/jv. I wouldn't be here if I didn't believe they will achieve this. What form this will take will be interesting. I wouldn't be surprised if these things fall into place just in time for the AGM. Possibly 2 big announcements prior to the AGM including KDR. Crunch time for me and many others I suspect. | goldeneye5 | |
22/10/2015 21:57 | Correct Goldeneye5....and it has been hinging on that exact point now for a couple of years. JV/mega finance or bust. | craffert | |
22/10/2015 11:37 | Has anyone been able to contact or get a response from the company in the last 6 months?I suspect they have been organizing the finance for the past few months. If finance gets sorted, this will be transformational for CGNR. Success here all comes down to this | goldeneye5 | |
21/10/2015 22:23 | Craffert.I do tend to take everything you say with a pinch of salt.I would not trust you because of the way you twist things.I know from past experience that mineng speaks from the heart and is totally credible. | newprom | |
21/10/2015 21:54 | Newprom - what Mineng is telling you is that your latest transformational news has absolutely no relevance to CGNR ore type and grades. If you respected his views and listened to him you would have read the last sentence. But you tend to avoid honest factual negative news irrespective of who shoves it up here. | craffert | |
21/10/2015 13:45 | Mineng.I respect your views on this,as you are usually somebody to listen to. | newprom | |
21/10/2015 13:13 | we haven't met, have we? | thecynical1 | |
21/10/2015 13:12 | newprom - your faith in these guys is seriously impressive ( others may choose to use a different term ) but I don't share your enthusiasm. If they start pfaffing around with a new technology, it'll just give them an excuse for nothing happening for another X years......jmo. | thecynical1 |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions