Cloudified Share Discussion Threads

[debbiegee] 26/8/2015 15:23

Im gonnna filter anybody who comunicates with them

[debbiegee] 26/8/2015 15:22

fANCY ENTERNAINING THEM WHEN THEY GET PAID PER POST.
The last time they were out in force was because they were trying to fill their buy order and needed some more peeps to part with their shaeres.
Most of us have them on filter and do not repeat their posts that are the same vile dribble on every thread.

[bad robot] 26/8/2015 14:39

Hman

Boxer's house.

[h1tman] 26/8/2015 14:37

Is deb's the maths teacher? Deary me, all the students will be getting F and U in their GSCE maths exams, if that's the case . :(

[h1tman] 26/8/2015 14:36

LOLOL

Boxer, are you the engerlish headteacher on CHL thread?

[baxter99] 26/8/2015 14:35

"Truthfull" (sic)LOL

[h1tman] 26/8/2015 14:35

BOXER house

[debbie_does_dallas_twice] 26/8/2015 14:34

Have you noticed Baxter never has anything to actually say about CHL at all.
You can hate my comments, fair enough, but at least i actually talk about CHL.

[debbie_does_dallas_twice] 26/8/2015 14:30

really have no idea bones, would not/ have not touched coal miners since CDN.
crazy ride from 1.5p to 140p, (share was consolidated along the way.)
I think it then fell back to 10p and ended up getting taken over at 120p

crazy.

[bad robot] 26/8/2015 14:29

HAHA BOXER GOT SHREDDED BY SOMEONE BEING TRUTHFULL.


WOOF WOOF BOXER, GET BACK TO YOUR DOGHOUSE

[bones30] 26/8/2015 14:28

baxter - not really, they are right. I've had a few losers lately.

CHL - I tend to find I'm right on although the poster has a point in a sense. The 10p placing, and the timing was errr...

CHL may well need to raise money at some point but I don't call this news. The average prices of the shareholders are way higher than current levels I'd say, even after recent placing at 10p.

Given how much skin everyone has in the game, dilution is a risk but not a massive one. I reckon they'll next raise at a lot higher than 10p assuming settlement doesn't happen.

Additionally if the directors were on the take (see most of AIM) then they'd not be paying themselves in shares.

[bad robot] 26/8/2015 14:28

BOXER

WOOOF WOOOF


Come back at 8p, I may throw some bones at you.


Hope this helps

[bad robot] 26/8/2015 14:26

Yeah bones698. Already corrected myself above

[baxter99] 26/8/2015 14:26

bones30 outguns BR... shot him to bits!

[bones30] 26/8/2015 14:24

Different bones, Bad Robot.

[bones30] 26/8/2015 14:24

I don't understand POLO at all. Messed up there. However, have been quite a few wins this last year or so, so don't concern yourself. I'm not going to post my suspicions there but I think one can perhaps draw conclusions from the share price. Would you agree?

[debbie_does_dallas_twice] 26/8/2015 14:21

ok take afren out of the question and replace it with polo?
Now is that you?

[bones30] 26/8/2015 14:19

No different user. Not been in AFR

Fastnet - my average very low.
GCM - I'm actually positive there. Again v. low average.
ADSS - granted not good. I suspect this may be a good recovery, mind.

[bad robot] 26/8/2015 14:19

Facts are these

Who’s going to hold for next 6m-12m or the long run of 3-4 years?

How much cash left?

When is the next placement?

Possibly annulment risks when it reaches the ad hoc committee

Who's going to force a Sovereign nation to pay?

London High court, yes. Put another 20m-30m in legal fees

[debbie_does_dallas_twice] 26/8/2015 14:17

OR the same bones on Afren, gcm ,atlas, fastnet et al ??

[bad robot] 26/8/2015 14:17

Bones are you not the same person on ramco from 120p to 10p something?