Chill Brands Share Discussion Threads

[kemche] 31/1/2022 08:54

3p the destination.

[g1g4lo] 31/1/2022 08:53

Oh single figures at 9.75p
And who said we do not need funds?

[kemche] 31/1/2022 08:52

Pairs trading hedge funds wading in.

[kaka47] 31/1/2022 08:50

Knock Knock Who is there Fear Fear who Deeply discounted placing FEAR

[g1g4lo] 31/1/2022 08:42

New 12 month low - does look like single figures today terminator

[kemche] 31/1/2022 08:17

Mind the door....


Raw.

[terminator101] 31/1/2022 08:16

Single figures today IMO

[suggster] 30/1/2022 19:44

Echo am friends ramping on a Sunday can only mean one thing! Sp set to slide, single figures coming with fund raising. Avoid

[kemche] 30/1/2022 17:18

I bought at 8p, 60p, and 36p.

My average is 3p.

[trollrollo] 30/1/2022 16:15

I like how kimbo has lost its sarcasm.... what a dirty troll wannabe. ;)

[echoridge] 30/1/2022 16:11

and you conveniently neglected the non-cash options hit and the £1m one-off loan, so right back at ya

[kemche] 30/1/2022 16:03

"and both numbers were negatively impacted by the £1m spent on the chill.com domain, a one-off expenditure if there ever was one. Yeah, but you're the genius....."

A minor CFA matter but the loss for the period does NOT include the chill.com purchase as it a balance sheet item and neither does the OPERATING cash outflow - as it is an INVESTING activity. But good try.

How wrong and how often?

"Yeah, but you're the genius....." Proof certainly seems to indicate so.

[echoridge] 30/1/2022 15:31

So of course you know that the 'loss for the period' is enhanced up by 1.34m of non-cash options expenses, the net cash used by operating activities includes the one-off £1m loan which is being repaid, and both numbers were negatively impacted by the £1m spent on the chill.com domain, a one-off expenditure if there ever was one. Yeah, but you're the genius.....

[kemche] 30/1/2022 14:09

"Viridian can and will pursue a credit/loan facility backed by the Company's order flow and assets. "

What utter nonsense! What "assets"??? What credit facility? Bases on £1m sales?

[kemche] 30/1/2022 14:06

"I'm not going to lose much sleep."

No.

Just money.

[kemche] 30/1/2022 14:04

Loss for the period (2,583,675)

Net Cash Used by Operating Activities (2,743,359)

Raw.

[kemche] 30/1/2022 14:04

Loss for the period (2,583,675)

Net Cash Used by Operating Activities (2,743,359)

Raw.

[kemche] 30/1/2022 14:02

I didn't reply because I didn't understand a word of it being a simpleton.

[kemche] 30/1/2022 14:00

Equity raise needed, equity raise coming.

[echoridge] 30/1/2022 13:12

yeah, I saw your 'devastating' nonsense the first time, kimmie. I didn't reply because I couldn't be bothered. I was right. This is all a matter of revenue recognition and some delays in delivering on early orders, which makes the accounting more complicated because the company often have a middleman in its master distributor, Ox, so your childish 'gotcha' reprint of someone else's post doesn't play. Could the 2 or 3 RNSs have been better worded between 'orders', 'sales' and 'revenues'? Yes, and the company is to be faulted for not doing so. However, I am completely comfortable that management will clear up any confusion very soon and most importantly, any remaining difference between declared orders and the £1m in reported sales in the interims, will be converted to cash sales over these current months, and all numbers will tie in. winnie, terminated, you and whomever else want to scream otherwise, are just so much stuff and nonsense. No equity raise needed, none coming

[nwixh53] 30/1/2022 13:02

I understood echos perfectly but yours is incoherent shorter nonsense!

[echoridge] 29/1/2022 23:45

Burn remains low at between 100k-150k/month. Cash continues to come in, so net cash balance remains near the £2m at September month-end. No equity raise needed. None coming.