ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for alerts Register for real-time alerts, custom portfolio, and market movers

CHLL Chill Brands Group Plc

2.35
-0.25 (-9.62%)
Last Updated: 12:03:57
Delayed by 15 minutes
Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Chill Brands Group Plc LSE:CHLL London Ordinary Share GB00BWC4X262 ORD 1P
  Price Change % Change Share Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  -0.25 -9.62% 2.35 2,075,713 12:03:57
Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price
2.30 2.40 2.60 2.35 2.60
Industry Sector Turnover Profit EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap
Offices-holdng Companies,nec 83k -4.29M -0.0149 -1.58 6.76M
Last Trade Time Trade Type Trade Size Trade Price Currency
12:36:06 O 42,990 2.34 GBX

Chill Brands (CHLL) Latest News

Chill Brands (CHLL) Discussions and Chat

Chill Brands Forums and Chat

Date Time Title Posts
23/4/202412:26Chill CBD Products8,361
22/4/202413:46CHILL BRANDS GROUP - Now Growing Rapidly - Huge Potential18
22/4/202408:05*** CHILL ***7
07/12/202319:53New video on Chill Brands Group2
09/10/202307:24Chill Brands Group - Building a Global CBD Business380

Add a New Thread

Chill Brands (CHLL) Most Recent Trades

Trade Time Trade Price Trade Size Trade Value Trade Type
11:36:082.3442,9901,005.97O
11:34:052.312,60360.00O
11:31:022.3573,5941,729.53O
11:09:582.37105,0002,488.50O
11:09:482.38105,0002,499.00O

Chill Brands (CHLL) Top Chat Posts

Top Posts
Posted at 23/4/2024 09:20 by Chill Brands Daily Update
Chill Brands Group Plc is listed in the Offices-holdng Companies,nec sector of the London Stock Exchange with ticker CHLL. The last closing price for Chill Brands was 2.60p.
Chill Brands currently has 287,615,305 shares in issue. The market capitalisation of Chill Brands is £6,902,767.
Chill Brands has a price to earnings ratio (PE ratio) of -1.61.
This morning CHLL shares opened at 2.60p
Posted at 22/4/2024 05:18 by purchaseatthetop
CHLL had £1.95m cash at 30/9/23 after losing £1.5m in the previous six months.
On 26/1/24 £1.07m of cash was raised plus turning the £1.2m loan and accrued £13k interest of J Swann into shares.

So since 30/9/23 CHLL has burned the original cash of £1.95m plus £2.27m less whatever cash balance is now.

At the previous cash burn rate of £1.5m per six months they should have about £2.5m left now but Swann has said that the argument is because the USA is draining the company of cash. That should be no surprise given the previous experience with Ox Distribution now renamed as a new co to hide the association.

My guess is that J Swann has discovered that there is a Going Concern qualification on its way after he has pumped fortunes into the company, that the cash is now less than six months runway, that they do not have the cash to develop new pod rechargeable products and that a huge pivot is required.
Posted at 19/4/2024 00:07 by tewkesbury
Replace the two US Directors and Chill could be back over 20p to 30p imo.

Posted yesterday by Ahananda on L-S-E:

Alan Green
Founder and CEO at Brand Communications
1h Edited

#CHLL - proposed restructuring moves should reinvigorate Chill Brands Group PLC

Jonathan Swann (JS) is seeking to requisition a general meeting along with 18 other shareholders (c24% of CHLL shareholders). JS has invested c£3.6m & also bought shares in the open market.

The JS shareholder group (JSG) are supportive of CEO Callum Sommerton, Scott Thompson & Eric Schrader, and the action has been bought against Antonio Russo and Trevor Taylor because JSG believes these two are actively hindering the growth of the company.

Although the pivot made by the Company in the past six months to focus on the UK market has shown good results, JSG believes the cash drain from the US side of the business is holding things back.

JSG also believe that corporate governance is not a priority for this Board, and they believe that the Board is not acting in the interest of all shareholders. With the departure of Mr Russo and Mr Taylor, the market will be able to clearly see a business and board aligned for the benefit of all shareholders.
Posted at 17/4/2024 16:00 by 1amulet
With investors awaiting key data on Chill Zero sales in the UK — and particularly reorder rates from Morrisons — it’s interesting that this letter appears to be targeted at the US side.

Chill Brands proposed resolutions
There are five resolutions being called for, which are as follows:

Graham Duncan to be appointed director immediately.
Aditya Chathli to be appointed director immediately.
That, conditional on 1 or 2 being passed, Antonio Russo be removed as director immediately.
That, conditional on 1 or 2 being passed, Trevor Taylor be removed as director immediately.
That any person appointed as director between the date of the letter (16/4) and the GM, other than those named in 1 and 2, be removed immediately.
The Meeting is being called for by TR1 holder (with over 13% of shares in issue) Jonathan Swann, who is supported by 18 other large investors. When all their shareholdings are combined, this group controls 24% of the total issued shares in the company.

For context, passing these amendments (any or all) requires the standard 50.1% simple majority. Swann has made a significant personal investment into the business, including recent additional financial support in January.

The general problems with Russo and Taylor appear to be both financial discipline and corporate strategy, on the US side of the business.

The US business is perhaps being accused of draining cash — and with no immediate signs of recovery — a view supported by the last two sets of published accounts which saw combined operating losses close to £1 million, and total losses of over £10 million.

This is significant for a £19 million company.

In terms of corporate governance, I can assume the problem lies — perhaps among other issues — with the continual US strategy which involves pushing cannabis-based products more than Chill Zero vapes, which may compare unfavourably to the success of the Chill Zero rollout in the UK.

Where next for Chill Brands?
There does not seem to be any personal problems — this directorate change simply seems to be something major shareholders need to see, in order to cut costs and improve the ongoing strategy abroad.

While the share price suffered following the UK government decision to ban disposable vapes, it has since recovered to 3.8p, down only around 20% year-to-date and essentially flat over the past year.

Given the push to change the US strategy, this suggests upcoming RNSs on the UK side could be very positive. And as the legislation to ban disposable vapes is not expected to be passed for some months, and the government will issue a six month buffer zone when it comes into effect, it may be at least a year until this legislative change makes a difference to Chill.

Regardless, I still expect the proposed legislation to be revisited by saner minds post-General Election.

For perspective, Australia’s ban on disposable vapes has been an unmitigated disaster as the market has simply been flooded with unregulated knockoffs. The new law is also seemingly tied into the somewhat insane legislation, just passed, which will stop anyone born after 1 January 2009 from being able to buy tobacco — a position that New Zealand recently reversed.

Because if the war on drugs has taught us anything, it’s that prohibition works.

Chill has also been working hard on non-disposable options (you can also argue its current ‘disposable217; vapes are differentiated from typical products, but that’s a case for a VAT lawyer). And in any event, the new tax on vapes will give the company an even larger competitive edge.

As a reminder, nicotine free vapes will be taxed an additional £1, vapes with less than 11mg nicotine at £2, and vapes with more than 11mg nicotine at £3 — per 10ml of liquid. The OBR has calculated that this will double the price of a high nicotine product from £3 to £6.

This provides a further financial incentive to buy Chill vapes, which already offer better value in terms of price per puff.

But in the end analysis, once this meeting is concluded, and with new directors on board, investors should be looking to Q2 RNSs which should clue them in the relative state of the UK-side success.
Posted at 16/4/2024 13:55 by institutional investments
Institutional Investments - 06 Feb 2024 - 16:07:19 - 7664 of 7996 Chill CBD Products - CHLL
Vlad The Impaler29 Jan '24 - 15:32 - 7612 of 7631 Edit
0 0 0
I think a 50:50 purchase split is excellent re SUP and CHLL

CHLL for the more volatile reaction from a steady market, post event

...

need sup to destabilise vlad.
Posted at 16/4/2024 12:39 by bbmsionlypostafter mk2
LOLS!!!

If it doesn't take "a rocket scientist to see what is happening" why do you think CHLL's competitors & multinational £Billion$ tobacco or FMCG companies with centuries of experience, contacts, established supply lines & distributor networks CHLL can't even begin to imagine would let CHLL, operating out of Callum's bedroom in his mums house with 11 quid in it's bank account, "to be at the top of the pack before the rest of the smoking world catches on"?

Get real.
Posted at 27/2/2024 16:14 by purchaseatthetop
Share price 10/6/23 11p
Share price today 2.4p


purchaseatthetop10 Jun '23 - 17:15 - 5470 of 7763 Edit
0 1 1
Sunday Roast 5/6/23
Midweek Takeaway 28/5/23
Sunday Roast 16/4/23
Sunday Roast 9/4/23
Sunday Roast 26/3/23
Sunday Roast 16/3/23
Midweek Takeaway 16/2/23

Never in the course of human events has so much money been given to Roast PR to pump so little for so much. Any time Zak Mir or Roast PR get involved you know, just know, it will end in tears

Villagepidgeon11 Jun '23 - 04:24 - 5475 of 7763
0 1 0
Patt , more allegations of bribery with no proof .. hope you’ve got a good lawyer

purchaseatthetop11 Jun '23 - 06:23 - 5478 of 7763 Edit
0 1 1
Share pumping is legal. Bribery is not.
My point is that nothing that RoastPR broadcasts has any basis in fact and should not be relied upon. All data should be delivered to shareholders via RNS as these are Regulated. The mere fact that Roast PR and Zak Mir are being paid to broadcast about CHLL so much is a massive red flag. See BEN and how exactly the same thing was done there. Share price was pumped to 108p. Now 16p. It enabled early buying insiders to convert huge profits offloading to PIs
Posted at 14/2/2024 21:10 by purchaseatthetop
Let’s remember my first ever post here in June 23 when it was 13p….you can see why the paid rampers like Lionel kipper are so aggressive!

purchaseatthetop4 Jun '23 - 06:15 - 5159 of 7719 Edit
0 2 1
Be very careful here. I had a look and it does not look good:

"Mike Shaw, Managing Director of the Vaping Group, said: "The opportunity to support Chill Brands with the UK launch of their vaping devices is not only very exciting but also incredibly timely. Regulators and industry peers are crying out for answers to the issues surrounding sustainability and social responsibility. While Chill's devices will inevitably help with the full conversion of smokers and vape users to nicotine free alternatives, the fact that they may last up to five times as long as existing nicotine vapes will also result in a reduced environmental impact. This enlarged puff count also ensures Chill Zero can remain competitive at a higher recommended retail price, elevating the brand beyond the "pocket money" spend category while maintaining attractive margins."

Actually, Mike Shaw is not a Director of The Vaping Group Ltd. He resigned on 31/12/22:


Moreover The Vaping Group changed its name on 25/4/23 from Vapetv Ltd to The Vaping Group Ltd which seems odd if it has years of marketing and channel experience.

Finally, the accounts to 31/12/21 show zero fixed assets, trade debtors of £17k (so hardly any revenue), and creditors due within one year of well over £550k with Directors salary of zero.

The RNS says "The Vaping Group acts on behalf of some of the world's leading vapour brands and has previously helped to take some of the industry's most recognisable names to market" which is a pile of rubbish as shown above.

So, this is a valueless sales and marketing agreement set up to pump the share price with all of those shares from the 3/4/23 CLNs to shift. Watch out. Clear skim.
Posted at 29/1/2024 15:46 by bbmsionlypostafter mk2
Vlad,

Your posting rate here of 1 post every 2-3 minutes is too slow to influence the share price Please pick up the pace if you are serious about ramping CHLL.

TIA.
Posted at 26/1/2024 09:36 by bbmsionlypostafter mk2
From the LSE CHLL discussion. In reply I look forward to more ENET posts and ad hominem attacks from our resident company shill.


lostmoney
Posts: 572
Price: 4.20


RE: WHSmithToday 08:01
Straight out of Zoetic RNS history playlist of all time classics, we are doing so well we need another raise, we have so many repeat orders we can’t afford to pay back loan repayments so we are giving them shares🤷996;‍♂️ another raise in about 6 weeks, at least Zoe waited till share prices recovered a bit between raises
Posted at 18/11/2023 15:07 by purchaseatthetop
Villagepidgeon. Lets look back at my first post here from June 23:

purchaseatthetop4 Jun '23 - 06:15 - 5159 of 6923 Edit
0 2 1
Be very careful here. I had a look and it does not look good:

"Mike Shaw, Managing Director of the Vaping Group, said: "The opportunity to support Chill Brands with the UK launch of their vaping devices is not only very exciting but also incredibly timely. Regulators and industry peers are crying out for answers to the issues surrounding sustainability and social responsibility. While Chill's devices will inevitably help with the full conversion of smokers and vape users to nicotine free alternatives, the fact that they may last up to five times as long as existing nicotine vapes will also result in a reduced environmental impact. This enlarged puff count also ensures Chill Zero can remain competitive at a higher recommended retail price, elevating the brand beyond the "pocket money" spend category while maintaining attractive margins."

Actually, Mike Shaw is not a Director of The Vaping Group Ltd. He resigned on 31/12/22:


Moreover The Vaping Group changed its name on 25/4/23 from Vapetv Ltd to The Vaping Group Ltd which seems odd if it has years of marketing and channel experience.

Finally, the accounts to 31/12/21 show zero fixed assets, trade debtors of £17k (so hardly any revenue), and creditors due within one year of well over £550k with Directors salary of zero.

The RNS says "The Vaping Group acts on behalf of some of the world's leading vapour brands and has previously helped to take some of the industry's most recognisable names to market" which is a pile of rubbish as shown above.

So, this is a valueless sales and marketing agreement set up to pump the share price with all of those shares from the 3/4/23 CLNs to shift. Watch out. Clear skim.


Share price on 5/6/23 was 12p
Share price today is 4p.
Seems I was right.
Chill Brands share price data is direct from the London Stock Exchange

Your Recent History

Delayed Upgrade Clock