ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for discussion Register to chat with like-minded investors on our interactive forums.

BGY Brit.Eng.Gp

772.00
0.00 (0.00%)
Last Updated: 00:00:00
Delayed by 15 minutes
Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Brit.Eng.Gp LSE:BGY London Ordinary Share GB00B04QKW59 ORD 10P
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  0.00 0.00% 772.00 - 0.00 00:00:00
Industry Sector Turnover Profit EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap
0 0 N/A 0

British Energy Share Discussion Threads

Showing 10201 to 10225 of 10575 messages
Chat Pages: Latest  411  410  409  408  407  406  405  404  403  402  401  400  Older
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
21/11/2007
19:24
I'm watching this now very closely and would expect a bounce from the support line if it reaches it, a downward breach of that support line would be very negative, but it looks like a good buying opportunity might well be in the offing soon...Rick
spacemoggy
21/11/2007
18:59
Sounds like you have a position here Scrib?
sat69
21/11/2007
18:29
RichB - No, I don't think it's "designed" to give that message.

B...dy government more concerned with pointless security measures and health messages etc than with securing energy supplies.

scribbler101
21/11/2007
18:07
Looks like we could be heading back to the 400p level.
sat69
21/11/2007
16:54
Is it possible that these problems with output are designed to let the Gov't, Gen Public, Greenpeace, Dept of Energy, Uncle Tom Cobley and all, know that the old stations are knackered and that to ensure security of supply we had better get our asses into gear re new build PDQ?
richardbroughton
13/11/2007
19:56
It seems possible that final year income figure may turn out not very different
from last years if I read what was said in the interim report correctly.

Looking at the figures slightly differently and taking the income attributable
to shareholders as the earnings, the p/e ratio looks close to 10. The question then is, will the generators run for another 10 years? Thoughts anyone?

speedy
13/11/2007
14:59
quiet here innit?
scribbler101
09/11/2007
13:59
They update on Tuesday don't they: Should be interesting at the very least...
tilmanstone
09/11/2007
12:44
Goldman Sachs buy note tilman - i remain sceptical & see this trading in £4 arena soon.
mdin79
09/11/2007
08:08
That was a fine opening this morning: anybody know why?
tilmanstone
07/11/2007
22:15
Have you noticed Brown has almost nothing to say about the existing UK nuclear generators as regards new nuclear build? At the moment British Energy is expressly forbidden to build any new capacity anyway thanks to the European Competition Commission's conditions in the "restructuring" agreement. Any new build will be based on foreign reactor technology where British Energy has neither build nor operational experience (we sold it all off recently to help fill Gordon's coffers). In fact, the only aces British Energy holds are the existing station sites - and these could no doubt be "compulsorily purchased" in the national interest at 5% of their value (just like the shares were remember).

Far from a no-brainer. I imagine Brown's ideal solution will be his usual off-the-books PFI deal where some vast Euro-consortium (with a token British representative of course) will slam in a packaged build-operate-guaranteed-profits deal, leaving us willing tax payers and electricity consumers to pay through the nose for decades to come. The new operators won't touch our clapped-out AGR fleet, so the future role of the British Energy seems likely to be that of an ageing caretaker quietly dusting off its reactors as one by one, they all go out.

bgyered
07/11/2007
07:51
...and with oil reaching $100pb (and only in finite supply), they will need nuclear for a cheaper, cleaner alternative.
sat69
07/11/2007
07:35
The annoying thing is that long term I think this is a no-brainer. Demand for nuclear is only going to increase IMO so this should be one to tuck away and hold, but announcements like last nights don't help...
tilmanstone
07/11/2007
07:02
Yep - Expect a large drop today I'm afraid.
sat69
06/11/2007
22:58
Thats not a clever post market announcement... Will be down in the morning me thinks...
tilmanstone
05/11/2007
13:19
Looks like another revisit of £4.50 is on the cards.
mdin79
30/10/2007
20:56
Buying time, but the general trend still appears to be down.
sat69
22/10/2007
15:15
There you go, back up to about 530p, think of it as a chance to top up! :o)
mirex
22/10/2007
13:12
Hope so, has removed in one go the slow but
steady gains from the last 2.5 months.

pc

:-[

pc4900074200
22/10/2007
12:20
Bad news on the reactors, especially close to the November results but from the inside perspective, complicatiions with the reactors shoudl be planned meticulously and the other reactors shutting down is VERY conservative so shoudl be resolved quickly. Allong with a terrible FTSE and US day, this should bounce back to £6 quickly on some good news, hopefully at the Nov'07 H1 results!
mirex
17/10/2007
16:10
Getting close to your 590 Moggy. I'm Holding with a trailing stop loss
webby
04/10/2007
07:27
Tipped in Shares mag today...near term rise to 590p...Rick
spacemoggy
04/10/2007
07:21
Money week and fleet street letter give a price target of £8 in 2008. Now that would be nice
webby
03/10/2007
23:02
£6 + here we come
atomik
01/10/2007
19:21
Read a report from moneyweek and fleet street letter today. It said that on 10 October the Governement is going to aprove the building of up to 14 new nuclear power stations. Some on existing sites and some at new sites. They tip LSE:BGY,TSX:CCO & LSE:NU.
webby
Chat Pages: Latest  411  410  409  408  407  406  405  404  403  402  401  400  Older

Your Recent History

Delayed Upgrade Clock