We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bowleven Plc | LSE:BLVN | London | Ordinary Share | GB00B04PYL99 | ORD 0.1P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.00 | 0.00% | 0.20 | 0.15 | 0.25 | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.00 | 08:00:00 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Oil And Gas Field Expl Svcs | 0 | -2.02M | -0.0062 | -0.32 | 654.93k |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
14/3/2017 15:33 | How strange!! Surely the point of a GM is to vote and announce the results?? Didn't they even read out the votes cast in the proxies? | johnwall | |
14/3/2017 15:32 | jonwall wasn't the case this time but I agree they normally are. They said they'd be released via RNS. Read into that what you will. | loglorry1 | |
14/3/2017 15:31 | Log... apologies if i've missed something (not been following this saga closely) but were the results of the vote not announced at the meeting? At every AGM/EGM i've been to the Chair reads the results of the proxy votes before putting the resolutions to the meeting. | johnwall | |
14/3/2017 15:23 | Don't think that's right cyman have messaged you. | loglorry1 | |
14/3/2017 15:06 | would that be Bowleven buy all COC shares for 40p WJ. | w1ndjammer | |
14/3/2017 14:54 | A large bird in legal circles informs me that both sides agreed to end the egm to sit down and discuss arrangements and draft rns. I believe that there might be other matters on the table too | cyman | |
14/3/2017 14:54 | Web site is up and running again. | lr2 | |
14/3/2017 14:52 | The other thought crossed my mind was that one or more board members who were NOT voted off may have indicated they would rather resign than work with COC. We will know soon enough. | cyan | |
14/3/2017 14:52 | i wonder if the plan involves putting pencils up his nose and shouting "wibble", when the COC spivs barge into the offices. | winnet | |
14/3/2017 14:40 | Perhaps KH has a last minute 'cunning plan'. More likely, imo, its dotting the 'i's' and crossing the 't's' of the RNS with a few generous words thanking certain individuals for their previous services. | cyan | |
14/3/2017 14:24 | well i said years back i would be a buyer if KH walked the plank, hope i can buy cheaper than current share price lets wait and see. WJ. | w1ndjammer | |
14/3/2017 14:10 | winnet, you can still buy back, still a very good price imo ;) ---------- No. I am on the sidelines to see how this plays out, with all but a small holding. | winnet | |
14/3/2017 14:06 | Easy to see, I'd say, if there is evidence that has only come to light between the meetings. Hence the formality of the question. So if, say, examination of Square1 Consulting directors and major shareholders leeds to a group of individuals living in Monaco colluding in the background and someone grassed them up.... Only an illustration not an accusation btw. | gheebee | |
14/3/2017 14:05 | winnet, you can still buy back, still a very good price imo ;) | buy_more | |
14/3/2017 13:55 | Given that coc votes were allowed at the previous meeting it is hard to see how they could disbar them this time. But all very odd that no announcement at the meeting.I am sure coc lawyers are in any meeting where votes are being discussed. | fft | |
14/3/2017 13:54 | Bowleven Holders team could claim a bonus! | gheebee | |
14/3/2017 13:53 | Website down 👀 | neilyb675 | |
14/3/2017 13:50 | It would be ironic if BLVN disallowed the COC votes and still lost. | loglorry1 | |
14/3/2017 13:48 | My concern was that the question formally put to COC by BLVN about beneficial ownership and ultimate control was designed to allow the company to debar the COC shares from the vote. But then all the other votes were counted.... | gheebee | |
14/3/2017 13:47 | thought you lot against the board were predicting a landslide the other day. I sold down most of holding believing the Sunday Times article. Maybe i was a little presumptuous... I imagine the RNS will need to be legally verified which all takes time... | winnet | |
14/3/2017 13:42 | I think it is safe to say if there is any way the current BoD can hang on even if it is temporary they will. I guess we'll find out soon enough. | loglorry1 |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions