Bidstack Share Discussion Threads

[aidenabettin] 05/1/2020 11:45

I'm afraid not. Stuck in the UK at the moment. I look after my 93 year old mum who has severe dementia 24/7.Got a break to Japan(paid for private carers).But 99% of the time I'm in the UK

[hazl] 05/1/2020 11:42

Aiden I think there might be some truth in that.

[bbmsionlypostafter] 05/1/2020 11:41

Aiden,

So, somewhere to the East of the UK by 2, maybe 3 hours?

Where could that be?

[aidenabettin] 05/1/2020 11:39

JD is 100% not a fraud but he is being lined up for a move imo.Just happens to have found himself at the head of something very substantial and the powers that be want a change of leadership and JD and other staff members to be replaced by industry heavyweights and those who will be taking BIDS up to the next level..JD and the rest of the board know the score.

[bbmsionlypostafter] 05/1/2020 11:38

20875

Provide a link pls. Oh wait....

You can't.

LOLZ!!!!

[hazl] 05/1/2020 11:38

Aiden 20869 I hope you're right!

[hazl] 05/1/2020 11:35

20868.....you clearly haven't read the relevant posts.
I'm not going to find it for you....my time is more valuable at present.
But interesting that you appear instead of log to defend it.

[bbmsionlypostafter] 05/1/2020 11:34

Aiden,

You regularly start posting around 5am UK time, some times 4am.

What time zone do you live in?

[moneygenxyz] 05/1/2020 11:34

Where do we stand with JD:

Yesterday we had someone who has been very balanced throughout their posting history who has had the opportunity to look the man in his eyes and knows the industry as well as anyone else.

He backs him and appears to be at ease.

Not only that, but industry heavy-weights back BIDS with deals left, right and centre.

Today we have self-declared shorters and white-knights who haven’t met James (although I’d love to see that play out, JD with a Glasgow kiss and Girdz with his bottle in hand) who have an agenda to see the price drop saying he’s a fraud and calling every deal a theatrical performance to boost the share price so two co-founders can release a little bit of their equity. And it is little let’s be clear.

They don’t back him.

🤔

Make your mind up.

[hazl] 05/1/2020 11:32

I think they were probably told not to worry so much about the investors .
but rather to concentrate on the longer picture and pleasing the big firms.

The trouble is their 'idea' is so simple and probably extremely effective, it could be easily taken away from them, is my thought.

This firm hasn't failed ....it's just the share price has dropped....a big difference.
Many companies go through similar.
It's upto the individual to decide whether that is an opportunity or not.

[aidenabettin] 05/1/2020 11:30

Just like BLCC(AFPO) would be gone for good?

[bbmsionlypostafter] 05/1/2020 11:29

LOL, I know. It'll be gone for good soon.

[aidenabettin] 05/1/2020 11:28

BIDS wont be on AIM for much longer.Moving up!!!!!

[moneygenxyz] 05/1/2020 11:25

So where is Tom’s and Tim’s Aim company if it is so easy to mug punters?

PWhite why don’t you set one up?

[aidenabettin] 05/1/2020 11:22

JD and FP were told to sell.Is it really that difficult to comprehend?

[yump] 05/1/2020 11:19

There seem to be quite a few people that think startup floats are a route to riches and that its somehow unfair that the share prices dont respond to their imaginative hopes.

The problem is actually that the time to invest in startups is pre-float, when your potential rewards are far higher, for the risk youre taking with a startup.

Startups are not floated to make new investors money. They’re floated by people with ideas that they think are big and saleable to new investors. There are also plenty of big idea people who actually make their business model work before float.

So no good whining about small companies not getting a fair crack when they are actually companies that havent even proven their business model before float.

Those people who think shorters ir derampers should be accountable should also in fairness also be campaigning for rampers and promoters with false facts and hype to be held to account.

People forget that not investing cannot lose you money, but being encouraged to buy at a hyped high price can.

So who has the moral highground ?

[pwhite73] 05/1/2020 11:18

hazl - "All firms start off small and these days they don't seem to be given a chance.
People that might have been reasonable in a previous life,look at them before they're proven and think they can make a few dollars out of their 'rocky patches' en route."

The one post you have made so far that I 100% wholeheartedly agree with. But you missed out the second part. It is the directors that make a few dollars out of their 'rocky patches' on route.

I've told you all before the most efficient way to run an AIM listed company is not to have any business at all but only the pretence of one. That way all the money goes straight to the bottom line which is the directors bank accounts.

If you take the latest RNS regarding the advertising contract. Assuming they receive the maximum revenue, £10m will enter their coffers over the next two years.

Between September 2018 and May 2019 the company raised £10m from the markets (mug PIs) all of it for free. Since then they've been accumulating more free money through the exercising of warrants again all for free.

That is how you run an AIM listed company once you have an army of ignorant followers. You only stop when too many of them catch on to what you're up to and you can't raise anymore funds. Over the last three weeks Bidstack has hit this first hurdle.

[moneygenxyz] 05/1/2020 11:09

Accountants are usually a prudent bunch.

I professionally wouldn’t recognise the asset but I’m personally heavily invested. Interpret that as you please.

With regards to JD, we’ll see.

[hazl] 05/1/2020 11:07

log we all know that when the price drops enough here, you buy again for a quick trade....by your own admission ...in so many words.
So your words are rather wasted....no?

[yump] 05/1/2020 11:05

Is this thread full of posts by a cliche generating bot ?

[loglorry1] 05/1/2020 11:01

Doesn't change the fact that the accountants view was that the money spent, as at that date, wasn't likely to produce an economic return. Sure that might change but how do you reconcile this with all the outlandish claims James Draper was making (while busisly selling his own virtually free shares) ?

[hazl] 05/1/2020 10:57

All firms start off small and these days they don't seem to be given a chance.
People that might have been reasonable in a previous life,look at them before they're proven and think they can make a few dollars out of their 'rocky patches' en route.

It's a dog eat dog situation these days.
As you say moneygen great posts last night.
Good luck people.

[hazl] 05/1/2020 10:49

The advertising game is clearly changing.
There will be winners and losers.
Latest victim perhaps?
Global Media and Entertainment recorded a pre-tax loss of £19.4 m for the 12 m to
March down from a £25.1m pre-tax profit the year before.

They operate in the 'out of home sector',providing services such as roadside billboards and video advertising screens on London's transport network.
Some of the loss has been due to acquisitions to be fair and I'm not saying their business doesn't look interesting as they have other strings to their bow.
'The three acquisitions have given Global a 35% share of the outdoor advertising market.
I will watch it's progress with interest .

However it does show the changing state of the advertising market and how they had to stretch themselves to compete.
Advertisers are desperate to find a niche.

IMO