ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for charts Register for streaming realtime charts, analysis tools, and prices.

BHR Beacon Hill

0.025
0.00 (0.00%)
17 Jan 2025 - Closed
Delayed by 15 minutes
Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Beacon Hill LSE:BHR London Ordinary Share GB00B4WM8G33 ORD 0.01P
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  0.00 0.00% 0.025 - 0.00 00:00:00
Industry Sector Turnover Profit EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap
0 0 N/A 0

Beacon Hill Share Discussion Threads

Showing 17401 to 17421 of 17750 messages
Chat Pages: Latest  698  697  696  695  694  693  692  691  690  689  688  687  Older
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
01/1/2015
21:04
I am a nutter, I thought you would all be aware of that. I repeat things all the time. I have a really good job as a hairdresser at Toni and Guy, which enables me to act as a decoy for a Mr. Justin Farr-Jones of Beacon Hill Resources, who gives me money to buy shares to shaft private shareholders and rob them of their hard earned savings.

I am a nutter, I thought you would all be aware of that. I repeat things all the time. I have a really good job as a hairdresser at Toni and Guy, which enables me to act as a decoy for a Mr. Justin Farr-Jones of Beacon Hill Resources, who gives me money to buy shares to shaft private shareholders and rob them of their hard earned savings.

I am a nutter, I thought you would all be aware of that. I repeat things all the time. I have a really good job as a hairdresser at Toni and Guy, which enables me to act as a decoy for a Mr. Justin Farr-Jones of Beacon Hill Resources, who gives me money to buy shares to shaft private shareholders and rob them of their hard earned savings.

I am a nutter, I thought you would all be aware of that. I repeat things all the time. I have a really good job as a hairdresser at Toni and Guy, which enables me to act as a decoy for a Mr. Justin Farr-Jones of Beacon Hill Resources, who gives me money to buy shares to shaft private shareholders and rob them of their hard earned savings.

I am a nutter, I thought you would all be aware of that. I repeat things all the time. I have a really good job as a hairdresser at Toni and Guy, which enables me to act as a decoy for a Mr. Justin Farr-Jones of Beacon Hill Resources, who gives me money to buy shares to shaft private shareholders and rob them of their hard earned savings.

traviis
01/1/2015
19:06
Travis do us all a favor and ask Justin for a new phrase, run along theres a good boy.
cjl2112
01/1/2015
18:29
All the fools voted NO and now they have lost everything.

You couldn't make it up

travls
01/1/2015
18:26
There is only one fool on this BB , and he needs specialist help.
jotoha2
01/1/2015
17:12
I am ecstatic with this company, my small holding here is worth 11p yes 11p and that's why these people should be prosecuted imo.
alby220
01/1/2015
16:46
Good to see that while some people see this this as pointless, there are others that can see why people are doing this.
I guess the difference between us is that some care about their investments, some people cant possibly care about their investments.
Say and do vs say and don't do, which is perhaps why AIM is in such disarray and you find some people on BB's that can see why the NO vote went ahead, vs a YES vote and support the board and its criminal activities.
Almost endorsing the way AIM is and supporting others to do the same.

Big thanks to everyone supporting what we are trying to do on a positive note and that is extended to the hoards of derampers that have appeared with post NO vote registration dates. The usual posts found in boards that amounts to posting words only as anything else amounts to committing to something.
Special thanks go out to those people, while they exist so will others trying to change things that may inspire others to do the same.
Hubris or not, those quotes came from the Chairman not me, if you think he is right then that's fine, I don't and others like me don't either.
They are out in the public domain and so have a value

Anyone can moan, but takes a bit more than that to change things.
hxxp://bhr-investors.com/viewtopic.php?f=27&t=1748&sid=c2feea594e61d37ef4adee84814c0308

redbike_lse
01/1/2015
16:18
Oh, The grand old Duke of Coventry He had ten thousand shareholders.He marched them up to the top of Beacon hill,
And he force marched them down again.and again and again!

oliversanvil
01/1/2015
14:05
WELL SAID Katie23 ! 100% agree.
alby220
01/1/2015
10:25
Do we know if regulators are definitely sniffing around.....
targatarga
01/1/2015
10:19
Tom Winnfriths NY Sheriff's Resolutions and the 10 least wanted men on Aim Bearcast www. shareprophets.com

Number5 on list JFJ

oliversanvil
31/12/2014
18:58
All the fools voted NO and now they have lost everything.

You couldn't make it up

travls
31/12/2014
18:57
Travls 31 Dec'14 - 18:54 - 9923 of 9925 0 0 (Filtered)

Take no notice, Tavis is quite obviously projecting his own failure.
He seeks personal solace in the supposed misery of others.
Sociopathic and quite pitiful....

katylied
31/12/2014
18:54
All the fools voted NO and now they have lost everything.

You couldn't make it up

travls
31/12/2014
18:47
Travis - If you had invested £70k as per FailedQS and there was only £150 of it remaining, do you think you would actually care about the final £150 as a monetary value, or would you prefer to see the people who robbed the other £69,850 off you get their comeuppance, with a fairly good chance you may also get some more of your investment returned? If the yes vote had won, FailedQS would now be looking at a maximum of £15 remaining following the 1000/1 consolidation and Darwin shorting the share back down to 0.0001p. If you had actually invested any of your money here, I think you would have thought it worth the gamble, as it is, I presume you are working for Toni and Guy or are JFJ's Personal Assistant, either way, I don't think any genuine investors support your views. Repeating the same message over and over does not make it or you any more credible, it makes you look insane.
katie23
31/12/2014
18:25
BOD are corrupt beyond belief , hopefully they will be struck of holding any Directorship in the future , how the city allows these parasites to operate there is just amazing . No more free lunches for these scumm
jotoha2
31/12/2014
18:07
All the fools voted NO and now they have lost everything.

You couldn't make it up

travls
31/12/2014
15:34
Why are you bothered ? !"humbugg" appropriate username ---complements of the season! Would you know if the BODS have contacted their Criminal Lawyers for counsel ?
oliversanvil
31/12/2014
15:13
give it up oliversanvil. the NO vote is just see this BOD done for fraud. all the rest is just coloured bubbles.
humbugg
31/12/2014
10:15
"This access with trains in my opinion could be worth more than the current market cap our company over the medium term" I have been saying this for along time ! Diaphanous shenanigans between Vale and BHR( excuse the pun)!
oliversanvil
31/12/2014
09:54
Total hubris now from redbike_lse. Even quoting JFJ for 'upbeat' sentiment. For heavens sake, get real. If shareholders had voted YES, most would have lost what little value they had left (and merely delayed the inevitable collapse). Voting NO doesn't change that. You still get nothing. The debt this company carries is very real and much too large, while the inflated asset values being quoted are just not credible (especially so, under current market conditions). The saving grace of the NO vote (which is worth something) is that you get the chance to finally stop management's gravy-train and perhaps (bit of a stretch) seek some redress via direct action in court...
katylied
30/12/2014
14:33
LibraG and Travis - And what would you have if the dilution had gone through? 1M shares would have been diluted to 1000 @ 0.10p (i.e. £100) and unless you had sold them immediately Darwin would have taken them back down to 0.001p within a week or so, which would leave you with £10. The only reasons for the dilution were first of all at 0.001p, there was nowhere else for the share to go but out of business, so it allowed Darwin to come in and take it back down again and also to ensure that private shareholders were no longer in the majority, so it killed off any opportunity for us to oppose any future actions.

No was the only option available for private shareholders to retain their ownership of the company and have any chance of getting a return on their investment. So stop trying to convince us we made the wrong decision, whatever the outcome, it was the only decision that gave us any chance of us getting something back.

katie23
Chat Pages: Latest  698  697  696  695  694  693  692  691  690  689  688  687  Older

Your Recent History

Delayed Upgrade Clock