We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Beacon Hill | LSE:BHR | London | Ordinary Share | GB00B4WM8G33 | ORD 0.01P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.00 | 0.00% | 0.025 | - | 0.00 | 00:00:00 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | N/A | 0 |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
01/1/2015 21:04 | I am a nutter, I thought you would all be aware of that. I repeat things all the time. I have a really good job as a hairdresser at Toni and Guy, which enables me to act as a decoy for a Mr. Justin Farr-Jones of Beacon Hill Resources, who gives me money to buy shares to shaft private shareholders and rob them of their hard earned savings. I am a nutter, I thought you would all be aware of that. I repeat things all the time. I have a really good job as a hairdresser at Toni and Guy, which enables me to act as a decoy for a Mr. Justin Farr-Jones of Beacon Hill Resources, who gives me money to buy shares to shaft private shareholders and rob them of their hard earned savings. I am a nutter, I thought you would all be aware of that. I repeat things all the time. I have a really good job as a hairdresser at Toni and Guy, which enables me to act as a decoy for a Mr. Justin Farr-Jones of Beacon Hill Resources, who gives me money to buy shares to shaft private shareholders and rob them of their hard earned savings. I am a nutter, I thought you would all be aware of that. I repeat things all the time. I have a really good job as a hairdresser at Toni and Guy, which enables me to act as a decoy for a Mr. Justin Farr-Jones of Beacon Hill Resources, who gives me money to buy shares to shaft private shareholders and rob them of their hard earned savings. I am a nutter, I thought you would all be aware of that. I repeat things all the time. I have a really good job as a hairdresser at Toni and Guy, which enables me to act as a decoy for a Mr. Justin Farr-Jones of Beacon Hill Resources, who gives me money to buy shares to shaft private shareholders and rob them of their hard earned savings. | traviis | |
01/1/2015 19:06 | Travis do us all a favor and ask Justin for a new phrase, run along theres a good boy. | cjl2112 | |
01/1/2015 18:29 | All the fools voted NO and now they have lost everything. You couldn't make it up | travls | |
01/1/2015 18:26 | There is only one fool on this BB , and he needs specialist help. | jotoha2 | |
01/1/2015 17:12 | I am ecstatic with this company, my small holding here is worth 11p yes 11p and that's why these people should be prosecuted imo. | alby220 | |
01/1/2015 16:46 | Good to see that while some people see this this as pointless, there are others that can see why people are doing this. I guess the difference between us is that some care about their investments, some people cant possibly care about their investments. Say and do vs say and don't do, which is perhaps why AIM is in such disarray and you find some people on BB's that can see why the NO vote went ahead, vs a YES vote and support the board and its criminal activities. Almost endorsing the way AIM is and supporting others to do the same. Big thanks to everyone supporting what we are trying to do on a positive note and that is extended to the hoards of derampers that have appeared with post NO vote registration dates. The usual posts found in boards that amounts to posting words only as anything else amounts to committing to something. Special thanks go out to those people, while they exist so will others trying to change things that may inspire others to do the same. Hubris or not, those quotes came from the Chairman not me, if you think he is right then that's fine, I don't and others like me don't either. They are out in the public domain and so have a value Anyone can moan, but takes a bit more than that to change things. hxxp://bhr-investors | redbike_lse | |
01/1/2015 16:18 | Oh, The grand old Duke of Coventry He had ten thousand shareholders.He marched them up to the top of Beacon hill, And he force marched them down again.and again and again! | oliversanvil | |
01/1/2015 14:05 | WELL SAID Katie23 ! 100% agree. | alby220 | |
01/1/2015 10:25 | Do we know if regulators are definitely sniffing around..... | targatarga | |
01/1/2015 10:19 | Tom Winnfriths NY Sheriff's Resolutions and the 10 least wanted men on Aim Bearcast www. shareprophets.com Number5 on list JFJ | oliversanvil | |
31/12/2014 18:58 | All the fools voted NO and now they have lost everything. You couldn't make it up | travls | |
31/12/2014 18:57 | Travls 31 Dec'14 - 18:54 - 9923 of 9925 0 0 (Filtered) Take no notice, Tavis is quite obviously projecting his own failure. He seeks personal solace in the supposed misery of others. Sociopathic and quite pitiful.... | katylied | |
31/12/2014 18:54 | All the fools voted NO and now they have lost everything. You couldn't make it up | travls | |
31/12/2014 18:47 | Travis - If you had invested £70k as per FailedQS and there was only £150 of it remaining, do you think you would actually care about the final £150 as a monetary value, or would you prefer to see the people who robbed the other £69,850 off you get their comeuppance, with a fairly good chance you may also get some more of your investment returned? If the yes vote had won, FailedQS would now be looking at a maximum of £15 remaining following the 1000/1 consolidation and Darwin shorting the share back down to 0.0001p. If you had actually invested any of your money here, I think you would have thought it worth the gamble, as it is, I presume you are working for Toni and Guy or are JFJ's Personal Assistant, either way, I don't think any genuine investors support your views. Repeating the same message over and over does not make it or you any more credible, it makes you look insane. | katie23 | |
31/12/2014 18:25 | BOD are corrupt beyond belief , hopefully they will be struck of holding any Directorship in the future , how the city allows these parasites to operate there is just amazing . No more free lunches for these scumm | jotoha2 | |
31/12/2014 18:07 | All the fools voted NO and now they have lost everything. You couldn't make it up | travls | |
31/12/2014 15:34 | Why are you bothered ? !"humbugg" appropriate username ---complements of the season! Would you know if the BODS have contacted their Criminal Lawyers for counsel ? | oliversanvil | |
31/12/2014 15:13 | give it up oliversanvil. the NO vote is just see this BOD done for fraud. all the rest is just coloured bubbles. | humbugg | |
31/12/2014 10:15 | "This access with trains in my opinion could be worth more than the current market cap our company over the medium term" I have been saying this for along time ! Diaphanous shenanigans between Vale and BHR( excuse the pun)! | oliversanvil | |
31/12/2014 09:54 | Total hubris now from redbike_lse. Even quoting JFJ for 'upbeat' sentiment. For heavens sake, get real. If shareholders had voted YES, most would have lost what little value they had left (and merely delayed the inevitable collapse). Voting NO doesn't change that. You still get nothing. The debt this company carries is very real and much too large, while the inflated asset values being quoted are just not credible (especially so, under current market conditions). The saving grace of the NO vote (which is worth something) is that you get the chance to finally stop management's gravy-train and perhaps (bit of a stretch) seek some redress via direct action in court... | katylied | |
30/12/2014 14:33 | LibraG and Travis - And what would you have if the dilution had gone through? 1M shares would have been diluted to 1000 @ 0.10p (i.e. £100) and unless you had sold them immediately Darwin would have taken them back down to 0.001p within a week or so, which would leave you with £10. The only reasons for the dilution were first of all at 0.001p, there was nowhere else for the share to go but out of business, so it allowed Darwin to come in and take it back down again and also to ensure that private shareholders were no longer in the majority, so it killed off any opportunity for us to oppose any future actions. No was the only option available for private shareholders to retain their ownership of the company and have any chance of getting a return on their investment. So stop trying to convince us we made the wrong decision, whatever the outcome, it was the only decision that gave us any chance of us getting something back. | katie23 |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions