We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Avacta Group Plc | LSE:AVCT | London | Ordinary Share | GB00BYYW9G87 | ORD 10P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
-0.25 | -0.53% | 46.50 | 46.00 | 47.00 | 46.50 | 45.25 | 45.75 | 2,892,374 | 15:06:30 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pharmaceutical Preparations | 10.06M | -39.19M | -0.1382 | -3.36 | 131.88M |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
04/3/2024 19:18 | Getting to that point where the quick bounce anticipation trading buyers, are selling for a small loss. Many millions bought for a bounce will get fed back in. | ohwhatfun | |
04/3/2024 15:37 | Whitey ...the man who thought convis could be sold a year in advance. Pmsl. How.s your knowledge of what shipping means these days. Dont believe a single word that comes out of Whitey.s yapper. How.s your set ups going Whitey. Found any? | amanitaangelicus | |
04/3/2024 12:31 | stockhunters - "nothings changed fundamentally just cashed up now" Yes something has changed fundamentally and structurally. Fewer mug PIs are taken in by the therapeutic story. That is the root cause of the discounted placing not the CLNs that have been around since October 2022. | pwhite73 | |
04/3/2024 11:49 | nothings changed fundamentally just cashed up now | stockhunters | |
04/3/2024 11:36 | Chill , the inhouse brokers will be putting out a strong note soon. Or Myles will come up with a big fluffer. | amanitaangelicus | |
04/3/2024 11:13 | They obviously don't want it otherwise they would have subscribed for a big chunk when the share price was over a £1 to take a strategic stake. The fact that they've had to do a hugely discounted placing to the usual City of London Barrow Boys tells you all you need to know about how the BPs value Avacta right now. | 1347 | |
03/3/2024 20:37 | Whitey - the green eyed monster. And wet behind his ears. Set ups Whitey, get with the plan. Patience essential. No set up here at the mo. Convi reset next ...have too. Enjoy the greenery fella. | amanitaangelicus | |
03/3/2024 17:29 | jonny obviously the raise got leaked hence they had to raise at 50p | stockhunters | |
03/3/2024 15:59 | Think there will be lots of news. I don't have any problems' Full steam ahead | fieldhouse | |
03/3/2024 15:52 | No matter you will still be able to time your trades perfectly, scoundrel. | pwhite73 | |
03/3/2024 13:58 | Feel sorry for the trapped. Smith has shafted them whilst promising the earth. Van we believe a thing he says? Sadly, no. News always late, pi.s last to know. Now a big news void until 2025 other than Smith twaddle. I fear the worse. | amanitaangelicus | |
02/3/2024 22:47 | There was inadequate demand to keep the stock at 100p (hence it fell to 75p before the placing), so the idea that they could have raised £25m at that level is laughable. Even the Board only threw in £65k here, probably less than AS spent on the kitchen in his new house. Almost like they know the equity is getting zeroed but were told to throw some change in to have any chance of getting the placing away | jonnywalker77 | |
02/3/2024 13:50 | Thank you. | rajraj b | |
02/3/2024 11:39 | Yes I admit it. It was a comment that went too far and I sincerely apologise. I have edited my last post. | pwhite73 | |
02/3/2024 10:59 | Raj b - "So a ‘real’ II could buy below 3% and not need to show a TR1. So, 2.99% would be a fairly substantial holding and you wouldn’t be any the wiser." Yes that's correct. But the point of mentioning institutions is to instil confidence in retail shareholders. If the institution is under 3% then you don't know if the institution is Berkshire Hathaway managed by Warren Buffet which would send the share price soaring or AJ Bell, Hargreaves or Interactive Investor which indicates retail shareholders. | pwhite73 | |
02/3/2024 10:18 | So a 'real' II could buy below 3% and not need to show a TR1. So, 2.99% would be a fairly substantial holding and you wouldn't be any the wiser. Might be a bit pointless waiting on TR1's then as confirmation that 'real' II have bought in. What did you mean by doing 'anything silly'? | rajraj b | |
02/3/2024 10:10 | Raj b - The minimum holding required to submit a TR1 is 3% or over. AJ Bell etc are real institutions. Perhaps 'misleading' is the wrong word and I should be using the term 'promotion'. The promotion is that an institution interested in the health sector has suddenly taken an interest in AVA6000 at 50p when it had no interest at 200p or when they first published the detailed Phase 1 results in December 2023 when the price was 140p. Unless a TR1 is filed by an institution all the new placing stock is with retail shareholders. | pwhite73 | |
02/3/2024 10:06 | Lol mc pumpy dumpy, he does love his deciples, open and transparent, oh dear | repins1 |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions