ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for monitor Customisable watchlists with full streaming quotes from leading exchanges, such as LSE, NASDAQ, NYSE, AMEX, Bovespa, BIT and more.

AMER Amerisur Resources Plc

19.18
0.00 (0.00%)
Last Updated: 01:00:00
Delayed by 15 minutes
Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Amerisur Resources Plc LSE:AMER London Ordinary Share GB0032087826 ORD 0.1P
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  0.00 0.00% 19.18 19.18 19.20 - 0.00 01:00:00
Industry Sector Turnover Profit EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap
0 0 N/A 0

Amerisur Resources Share Discussion Threads

Showing 95951 to 95974 of 105625 messages
Chat Pages: Latest  3841  3840  3839  3838  3837  3836  3835  3834  3833  3832  3831  3830  Older
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
18/1/2019
13:51
gersemi
18 Jan '19 - 13:43 - 16229 of 16231
0 0 0
I knew this would turn blue ;)

..You were worrying about "shorters" earlier ;-#))

thegreatgeraldo
18/1/2019
13:46
If Occidental invested $94m for the 50% stake in some assets, you'd imagine they must see value of $190M+ so AMERs 50% is worth the same.

CPO-5 having even just 20M barrels for little AMER adds another $200m+

Then add the OBA and other assets

Plenty of upside in the share price from these levels

the drewster
18/1/2019
13:43
I knew this would turn blue ;)
gersemi
18/1/2019
13:38
could be the last time to buy before results and update,would you want to take the chance of being out over the weekend?
tom111
18/1/2019
13:20
Can sell for 18, thought I'd never see that again. Really motoring now!!!
mad foetus
18/1/2019
12:48
The share price is currently down to the level at which the Directors bought wholesale only about two weeks ago. I am pretty sure the Directors did not buy for a laugh, they bought to substantially gain from the massively improved prospects in respect of discovered reserves and reserves about to be discovered. This is not a time to sell, IMO.
winnings1
18/1/2019
12:45
The share price has not been "Amazon" today!
mad foetus
18/1/2019
11:58
Roll, always wise to have some dry 'wiggle room', as I do too ;o) but see v little downside from this still incredibly depressed share price The news here has been astonishingly good, miraculous we're all still able to build our positions and trade on the tops and drops.
knackers
18/1/2019
11:22
Gersemi

Rex Harbour is long gone in any meaningful size.

He used his firepower to get the share down to 9.5p. Having disposed of 1% in little than a month in a very low volume period, he only had 2.83% at the beginning of September 2018: dumping at that rate clearly saw him gone in November and given the high volumes,his exit was facilitated. You need to remember that when his holding diminished, there was little cost to the dump and that was why it escalated.

Shorters always rode on the back of him and there are still shorts to be closed by those who got caught out, by the OXY deal.

The intelligent analysis here focuses on the contradiction between fundamentals and actions taken by those more "TA" driven: the former tend to be LTHs and as such, do not affect the market to any significant extent. The latter, mainly traders, and because of that, making the majority of sales and purchases and thus forming the market, are currently driving the SP: they are disciplined to take profits and that is what you are seeing.

I would also speculate that the MMs may not have had sufficient shares to satisfy the market on its recent mega rise and may also have a vested interest in rapidly reducing the share price to trigger stops and shake confidence: the classic "tree shake" a game they continually play.

What LTHs have to hope is that sufficient of the new purchasers are also intending to be LTHs and can see the potential here for another Emerald Energy by JW, the discovery of the decade, light, cheap oil to extract in huge size, with wells that produce for years, giving real return on every £1 spent sinking the well (unlike the shale ponzi scheme!).

The fear for LTHs has to be a predator: that is always the result of the market failing to recognise value.

charlieeee
18/1/2019
11:10
I took a few more this morning anyway. Accept it could be cheaper on Monday, but the longer game looks pretty solid now.
davwal
18/1/2019
11:06
Calao-1, targeting a structure alongside Indico to the southwest, towards the Aguila structure expected to spud in January 2019. On a simple structural basis, the Company estimates potential resources at Calao of between 2 and 7 mmboexpecting this to be confirmed next week.
tsmith2
18/1/2019
10:57
O/T IRON up 54% today. I wonder what GC is saying at the AGM...
bigwavedave
18/1/2019
10:41
300k sell at 17.60p. That sell is definitely not your average shareholder

As long as I know the selling is down to the malicious Harbour rather than fundamental related then fair dooooo's

gersemi
18/1/2019
10:41
Same here Rollthedice.
xxnjr
18/1/2019
10:36
‘This is not normal price action’...

Actually, where Amer has been concerned for two years this ‘action’ looks entirely normal. The sells look classic Harbour, despite several folks telling us he’s gone. In my view he’s still dribbling the remainder of his once massive holding.

davwal
18/1/2019
10:31
Rolled the dice I think that's a very good option.
moneylender
18/1/2019
10:27
Taxes due on Jan 31st for a lot of investors. No point in clinging on if you see short term gains being eroded with no substantive developments before month end.
lucyp00p
18/1/2019
10:25
@tyler durden, Post 16196:

An example of variance of reserves estimation against outcome:
The UKCS Brent Field: 1.8bn boe at FFID in the mid '70's. Field life, 25 years.
Ultimate production: approx. 3bn boe. Field life, 40 years.

Of course variance plays to the upside and the downside and is always dependent on the assumptions which, in turn, vary.
A 10% variance in future reserves estimations is not credible as most in the industry would know. The WSJ, like most journalists, start with an agenda then attempt to manipulate the "facts" to support the conclusion.

sogoesit
18/1/2019
10:24
If Q4 production figures are poor there'll be a harder treeshake than this IMHO irrespective of the recent news. Keeping some powder dry for that eventuality.
rollthedice
18/1/2019
10:11
FFS pardon my French but it's a CLASSIC tree-shake! and there could be another this afternoon. And there could also just as easily be a blue close.

MMs playing the share price like the proverbial college organ. End of.

knackers
18/1/2019
10:07
avsome1968
18 Jan '19 - 10:03 - 16208 of 16208
0 0 0
Nicksig; Just be lack of news investors get nervous taking profit

...Sure you mean that traders get nervous, or rather get bored...

thegreatgeraldo
18/1/2019
10:07
gersemi - assume what you like. I couldn't give a toss. I think you might find that people do take profits after an 80% rise
nicksig
18/1/2019
10:06
G,

If your definition of *shorted* is peeps who top sliced last week and now awaiting lower re-entry price - fine, OK.

You don't *short* 200+ feet of net pay unless certified

paradores
18/1/2019
10:03
Nicksig; Just be lack of news investors get nervous taking profit cant blame them if there's a chance of buying back in couple pence cheaper they've made a wise choice but personally am not a trader not glued to the phone all day unfortunately I have to work so long to medium term picks for me good luck to the guys that are in and out.
avsome1968
Chat Pages: Latest  3841  3840  3839  3838  3837  3836  3835  3834  3833  3832  3831  3830  Older