ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for default Register for Free to get streaming real-time quotes, interactive charts, live options flow, and more.

Haynes - Financial distress risk

Share On Facebook
share on Linkedin
Print

Piotroski factors provide some insight into the likelihood of financial distress by examining trends in key accounting metrics over two years.  If all nine point in a positive direction then a very low level of distress is indicated. Any score under five out of nine should make us wary.

I’ll use the latest annual report to 31st May 2018 along with the 2017 report.

    1. Is it profitable? 

Yes, net income before exceptional items was £2m. One Piotroski point.

  1. Does it produce positive cash flow from operations? 

Yes. Operating cash flow was £9.4m. Second Piotroski point.

Don’t be too impressed by that large cash flow number because £7.8m of it was the adding back of amortisation of intangible assets (a non-cash item) to the profit number. More than offsetting this, the firm spent £8.4m on new intangible assets (intellectual property) in 2018.  This “product development” expenditure is capitalised on the BS as an intangible asset and amortised over 5 years.

Nevertheless, even though IP spend and amortisation are roughly the same, the company produces positive cash flow after we deduct £8.4m as well as the £0.5m investment in property plant and equipment.

  1. Has the return on capital employed figure improved? 

Yes. Net income before exceptional items divided by beginning of year total assets was £2m/£60m = 3.3% in 2018 and £1.4m/£53.8m = 2.6% in 2017.   Third Piotroski point.

But note the poor returns on BS assets – most of these assets (£33.2m) are intangible intellectual property, especially capitalised product development.

Net assets, after deducting payables of £9.8m, borrowings of £2.2m and £18.7m in pension deficit, are much smaller at £25m.  But even if we used this in the denominator we find that Haynes earns a poor return on capital.

And the directors know it: I asked a very direct question at the AGM pointing out to Eddie Bell, Chairman, that what he had declared “a strong year” in his statement was, in fact, a weak year in terms of return on shareholder capital; and returns have been poor for five years.  To his credit he acknowledged the problem and said they were determined to address it.

Talking to Eddie and other directors after the formal meeting I gained the impression that there is an informed, rational and rigorous debate taking place within senior ranks to address capita

………………To read more subscribe to my premium newsletter Deep Value Shares – click here http://newsletters.advfn.com/deepvalueshares/subscribe-1

CLICK HERE TO REGISTER FOR FREE ON ADVFN, the world's leading stocks and shares information website, provides the private investor with all the latest high-tech trading tools and includes live price data streaming, stock quotes and the option to access 'Level 2' data on all of the world's key exchanges (LSE, NYSE, NASDAQ, Euronext etc).

This area of the ADVFN.com site is for independent financial commentary. These blogs are provided by independent authors via a common carrier platform and do not represent the opinions of ADVFN Plc. ADVFN Plc does not monitor, approve, endorse or exert editorial control over these articles and does not therefore accept responsibility for or make any warranties in connection with or recommend that you or any third party rely on such information. The information available at ADVFN.com is for your general information and use and is not intended to address your particular requirements. In particular, the information does not constitute any form of advice or recommendation by ADVFN.COM and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any investment decisions. Authors may or may not have positions in stocks that they are discussing but it should be considered very likely that their opinions are aligned with their trading and that they hold positions in companies, forex, commodities and other instruments they discuss.

Leave A Reply

 
Do you want to write for our Newspaper? Get in touch: newspaper@advfn.com