VSA Capital Share Discussion Threads

[ianguerin] 07/4/2013 11:59

CAZA hits oil - do VSA hold any shares or warrants in it?

[topinfo] 05/4/2013 20:11

This is NEOS all over again IMO. I bought NEOS 0.1p hoping and believing it would not get de-listed and look what happened there, it multiplied 7 times!

I can see share price here back over 3p+ very soon!

[topinfo] 05/4/2013 20:10

Anyone thinking of taking a punt here. Look at this Rns 7th December 2012 and look at mkt cap £680k. This is why I think it will not de-list and people are going to vote against it, especially new shareholders buying in now to 15th April 2013 like myself. Picked some more up today too.

VSA!!

-- Net assets at 30 September 2012: GBP1,735,075 (H1 2011: GBP502,690).

-- Cash balance at 30 September 2012: GBP1,019,097 (H1 2011: GBP414,150) with a further GBP562,000 receivable in January 2013 in respect of a transaction completed in the prior period.

[topinfo] 05/4/2013 20:10

Ive voted against it too hence why Ive been buying. Upto 250k shares so far and will add more too. No way this will get enough votes to de-list IMO, investor support to keep it listed is too strong. I reckon by Tuesday next week it will be upto 12.5%

[dontshootthemessenger] 05/4/2013 16:54

Negative to Positive at PLUS? Recovery underway? - PMK

TOPINFO - 13 May 2011 - 14:21:52 - 306 of 4756

Thats me back in PMK looks grossly oversold at this level. What is cash per share now? Business in for free as well!

[dontshootthemessenger] 05/4/2013 16:48

Apparently their is a lying conman trying to suggest that VSA is the next NEOS ?

I doubt that. VSA is most likely the next PMK (the failed Plus Markets)

The lying conmen pump and dump brigade were claiming PMK had 2p per share of cash but it still crashed to 0.2p

Problem with these REGULATED entities is that the 'cash' they have is not really their UNENCUMBERED cash. The 'Cash' is actually REGULATORY CAPITAL.

Do not be Fooled by Pump and Dump merchants or lying conmen.

[poombear] 05/4/2013 15:18

Fwiw my vote for 424K shares has now been cast. Got nothing to lose as most are in a Sipp, so couldn't keep them private anyway.
Its not going to work out well for me whatever happens. Mentally have moved on to my other investments.

Off to Florida disneyland tomorrow, so getting stung again there as well.
Will be done and dusted by the time I get back.

Poorer Poombear

[topinfo] 05/4/2013 07:43

Votes against de-listing rising on a daily basis. This looks to me like they wont get enough votes to de-list. Watch share price recover then :)

[topinfo] 04/4/2013 15:58

Anyone thinking of taking a punt here. Look at this Rns 7th December 2012 and look at mkt cap £680k. This is why I think it will not de-list and people are going to vote against it, especially new shareholders buying in now to 15th April 2013 like myself. Picked some more up today too.

VSA!!

-- Net assets at 30 September 2012: GBP1,735,075 (H1 2011: GBP502,690).

-- Cash balance at 30 September 2012: GBP1,019,097 (H1 2011: GBP414,150) with a further GBP562,000 receivable in January 2013 in respect of a transaction completed in the prior period.

[topinfo] 03/4/2013 14:54

I said same thing at NEOS and look what happened there. I bought NEOS at 0.1p. The listing alone now is worth more than mkt cap and then you have the tax losses, the cash and the assets and they add up to far more than current mkt cap which is just £420k.

[topinfo] 03/4/2013 14:52

Just bought 150k shares at 0.85p and I will now be voting against the de-listing so put me votes down to help keep this company listed and allow share price to recover its falls after Rns put out last week.

[poombear] 02/4/2013 11:15

I expect this is the root of VSA's demise.

[selfservice] 02/4/2013 10:40

MiningMaven‏@theminingmaven
This has just been brought to our attention - need to do some research #VSA - Keep VSA Capital Group Listed

[solarno lopez] 02/4/2013 07:50

If you hold your shares in a nominee name, which is usual these days, you cannot sign the form even though you are the beneficial owner.

It MUST be signed by the nominee holder other wise your vote will be declared invalid

[poombear] 02/4/2013 07:38

Try emailing [e-mail] for the proxy forms.

For the record I hold 0.94%

[poombear] 02/4/2013 07:26

Some information on getting the proxy forms from Nick10 on lse who could possibly be the website guy?

"All unhappy VSA shareholders can obtain proxy forms and complete and sign and send or deliver them to VSA's registrars, Capita Registrars, PXS, 34 Beckenham Road, Beckenham, Kent BR3 4TU. Forms must arrive at the above address by 11.00 am on Monday, 15 April 2013. Only 25% of shareholders need to vote against. VSA currently have 36.8 votes for. It isn't the first time shareholders have won the day taking on such resolutions. You can obtain the forms by emailing VSA Capital who are legally obliged to provide them for you. VSA's email is on their website. You can also see the Keep VSA Listed website (www.keepvsalisted.co.uk) for more information. Good Luck all VSA shareholders. Thisresolution is NOT in our best interests.

[oscarmilo] 02/4/2013 03:25

Poombear I agree and with my 1.3% shareholding I think it is will vote against the delisting and rejection of the current plan.

[monkey puzzle] 01/4/2013 23:44

you really need to keep this listed as matched trading on stocks like this is a total waste of time and never works in reality, you just cannot trade via that process.

[poombear] 01/4/2013 23:40

A campaign to vote against the delist.

Www.keepvsalisted.co.uk

Need 25% to reject the current plan.

My thought is that Monk and the board should try a big paycut before shafting the shareholders.

[poombear] 31/3/2013 09:52

But can you hold shares in that manner in a sipp?

[oscarmilo] 31/3/2013 06:18

But they say they will have a matched bargain trading facility managed by Capita Registrars after the cancellation takes effect. I assume that means that value can still be achieved even after the cancellation of the AIM listing and that the value of current shareholders holdings remain the same. We do of course have less transparency if the value of the company continues to reduce but if it goes up I assume we still have our value protected.