We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Register for Free to get streaming real-time quotes, interactive charts, live options flow, and more.
| Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Stock Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Telephonetics | TPH | London | Ordinary Share |
| Price Change | Price Change % | Share Price | Last Trade
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.00 | 0.00% | 8.75 | 01:00:00 |
| Open Price | Low Price | High Price | Close Price | Previous Close |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8.75 | 8.75 |
| Top Posts |
|---|
Posted at 09/8/2010 15:50 by lbo Online chatroom rumours under scrutinyTwo UK-listed companies have launched investigations into rumours spread in online investment chatrooms, highlighting the influence of bulletin boards on the smaller end of the London stock market. Online bulletin boards such as ADVFN and iii attract thousands of posts each day from a dedicated audience of retail investors fiercely debating their portfolios |
Posted at 02/8/2010 11:29 by mudbath Spot on deanroberthunt.Here was an outfit on the cusp of delivering serious shareholder returns. Investors,long term and short were ROBBED of the potential benefits. Did not hold,yet was about to invest. Fleeced sums it up. |
Posted at 26/6/2010 12:59 by clocktower Cut from another thread - A WARNING to any possible investor:I suggest you look at these any the list of others MNT - WTV - FLX - look at all companies that Mike Nevile has sat on the board before investing imo. BluePrince - 24 Jun'10 - 11:49 - 3163 of 3164 Oh Dear another Mike N and James O Partnership |
Posted at 19/1/2010 20:36 by lbo A lot of AIM volume now trades on PLUS market. But I agree the performance and liquidity has been very poor. I wonder if the large shareholders are happy with the performance and liquidity? We can only assume they (the holders of 67.5%) are or would they not be looking for changes?Anthony Mckay 20,288,889 18.6% William Burgar 20,138,889 18.5% M Brooks Esq 12,909,843 11.8% Octopus 8,200,000 7.5% J Sandon-Allum Esq 6,333,333 5.8% Rathbones Investment Management 5,800,000 5.3% Companies with the following characteristics make for more attractive leverage buyout targets: * 1. Generate high levels of free cash flow relative to their valuations * 2. Have high net-cash/low existing debt balance sheets * 3. EV/EBITDA valuations are relatively low * 4. High level of insider (top-management) ownership * 5. Market conditions or investor perception that depresses stock price valuation TPH Mkt Cap = £8m - £4m cash = £4m EV and £1m EBITDA |
Posted at 14/1/2010 11:12 by clocktower How many investors have lost considerable sums of money in companies that Mike Neville sits or sat on the board of?Can you think of any reason why this should be a diffrent situation? |
Posted at 11/9/2009 21:55 by lbo Under-siege communications firm Spinvox is reportedly for sale, according to a note from one of its investorsThe BBC says investment firm Invesco Perpetual believes the value of its stake in the company has reduced by 90 per cent from £759,000 to £76,000. "The business has been put up for sale, and it is possible that, should a good sales price be achieved, the new valuation may be exceeded," Invesco Perpetual said in its report. Spinvox was once the darling of the UK's entrepreneurial tech scene but during the summer, it was alleged that Christina Domecq's voice-to-text firm relies heavily on call centre workers rather than groundbreaking technology. |
Posted at 16/8/2009 13:25 by lbo Christina Domecq's world is spinning out of control. The scion of the Domecq sherry dynasty collected a clutch of awards after the tech company she co-founded - Spinvox - exploded onto the UK market in 2003. Blue-chip investors put millions behind its revolutionary technology, which appeared to convert speech to text so no one would have to sit through endless voicemails again but instead be able to flick quickly through near word-perfect transcriptions. The adventure-sport-loviBut now Domecq and her team are under sustained attack. Shareholders have been sent an anonymous six-page dossier containing allegations of financial mismanagement at the technology firm, which has racked up over £50m of pretax losses and burnt through more than $200m (£120m) of investment in the last six years while counting its actual annual revenues in the low millions. Potentially more damaging to its future, the core of Spinvox's technology has also been called into question, with call centre staff across the globe - paid to listen to voicemails and manually transcribe them - alleged to be playing a large part in the business |
Posted at 23/3/2009 11:01 by lbo WHY ARE YOU HIDING FROM THE QUESTIONS RADCALHARDIN??LBO - 23 Mar'09 - 09:40 - 695 of 695 edit Can you also explain why you changed your post making accusations against Brewin Dolphin? REMEMBER THEY AND I HAVE THE ORIGINAL POST ON EMAIL! Can you also explain why you deleted posts? rascalhardin - 18 Mar'09 - 07:21 - 627 of 694 2t/John, Let me think...WTV is a specialist in the field of investor relations. They make most of their money from webcasting company results to the shareholders of much larger companies and by giving them IR advice. Sadly I cannot recommend them as Mike Neville was once Chairman. While Neville was Chairman of WTV, he disposed of a Swedish subsidiary called Kamera to some anonymous "high profile investors". When disposed of, Kamera was sold for thousands, however three years later, the anonymous investors sold the company for millions, thereby making a nice little earner at the expense of WTV shareholders. The current management of WTV, who like Neville have a very poor record of failed companies, have refused to provide shareholders with the names of these investors. So no, I cannot say I recommend WTV. Due in part to Mike Neville's input, they are now delisted and their shares are virtually untradeable. WTV has zero credibility as everyone knows that they are the worst hypocrites imaginable when it comes to shareholder accountability. A glance at the accounts of their subsidiaries shows that they have not been drafted with the object of keeping investors informed. Indeed, it is virtually impossible to disentangle the various figures shown in the accounts. WTV Directors refuse to answer reasonable questions about these accounts, as do the Auditors, a company called Brewin Dolphin. Isn't it Brewin Dolphin who have issued a "buy" broker's note for tph? Reminds me of the days when they issued lots of "buy" notes for WTV. Sadly this did not prevent the share price falling, then when the company diluted the shares and delisted from AIM, WTV shares became virtually worthless. That is brokers for you, I suppose! Makes you look at the current "buy" recommendation for TPH from Brewin Dolphin in a different light though. In view of the numerous subsidiaries which WTV has, it makes you wonder if TPH has any subsidiaries that can be sold off by Neville? If so, you can be sure, based upon Neville's record, that TPH investors will not benefit. Some anonymous investors could, though! As stated earlier, Neville does not have that many TPH shares compared to the other Directors. LBO - 18 Mar'09 - 10:52 - 628 of 694 edit Ok thanks Rascalhardin! I have copied your post and emailed it to Brewin Dolphin and lets see how they respond. Would you like to put it in writing aswell? info@brewin.co.uk rascalhardin - 18 Mar'09 - 11:01 - 629 of 694 All fact, LBO. Sadly. Are you close to Brewin Dolphin? rascalhardin - 18 Mar'09 - 11:01 - 630 of 694 . |
Posted at 23/3/2009 09:40 by lbo Can you also explain why you changed your post making accusations against Brewin Dolphin? REMEMBER THEY AND I HAVE THE ORIGINAL POST ON EMAIL! Can you also explain why you deleted posts?rascalhardin - 18 Mar'09 - 07:21 - 627 of 694 2t/John, Let me think...WTV is a specialist in the field of investor relations. They make most of their money from webcasting company results to the shareholders of much larger companies and by giving them IR advice. Sadly I cannot recommend them as Mike Neville was once Chairman. While Neville was Chairman of WTV, he disposed of a Swedish subsidiary called Kamera to some anonymous "high profile investors". When disposed of, Kamera was sold for thousands, however three years later, the anonymous investors sold the company for millions, thereby making a nice little earner at the expense of WTV shareholders. The current management of WTV, who like Neville have a very poor record of failed companies, have refused to provide shareholders with the names of these investors. So no, I cannot say I recommend WTV. Due in part to Mike Neville's input, they are now delisted and their shares are virtually untradeable. WTV has zero credibility as everyone knows that they are the worst hypocrites imaginable when it comes to shareholder accountability. A glance at the accounts of their subsidiaries shows that they have not been drafted with the object of keeping investors informed. Indeed, it is virtually impossible to disentangle the various figures shown in the accounts. WTV Directors refuse to answer reasonable questions about these accounts, as do the Auditors, a company called Brewin Dolphin. Isn't it Brewin Dolphin who have issued a "buy" broker's note for tph? Reminds me of the days when they issued lots of "buy" notes for WTV. Sadly this did not prevent the share price falling, then when the company diluted the shares and delisted from AIM, WTV shares became virtually worthless. That is brokers for you, I suppose! Makes you look at the current "buy" recommendation for TPH from Brewin Dolphin in a different light though. In view of the numerous subsidiaries which WTV has, it makes you wonder if TPH has any subsidiaries that can be sold off by Neville? If so, you can be sure, based upon Neville's record, that TPH investors will not benefit. Some anonymous investors could, though! As stated earlier, Neville does not have that many TPH shares compared to the other Directors. LBO - 18 Mar'09 - 10:52 - 628 of 694 edit Ok thanks Rascalhardin! I have copied your post and emailed it to Brewin Dolphin and lets see how they respond. Would you like to put it in writing aswell? info@brewin.co.uk rascalhardin - 18 Mar'09 - 11:01 - 629 of 694 All fact, LBO. Sadly. Are you close to Brewin Dolphin? rascalhardin - 18 Mar'09 - 11:01 - 630 of 694 . |
Posted at 18/3/2009 07:21 by rascalhardin 2t/John,Let me think...WTV is a specialist in the field of investor relations. They make most of their money from webcasting company results to the shareholders of much larger companies and by giving them IR advice. Sadly I cannot recommend them as Mike Neville was once Chairman. While Neville was Chairman of WTV, he disposed of a Swedish subsidiary called Kamera to some anonymous "high profile investors". When disposed of, Kamera was sold for thousands, however three years later, the anonymous investors sold the company for millions, thereby making a nice little earner at the expense of WTV shareholders. The current management of WTV, who like Neville have a very poor record of failed companies, have refused to provide shareholders with the names of these investors. So no, I cannot say I recommend WTV. Due in part to Mike Neville's input, they are now delisted and their shares are virtually untradeable. WTV has zero credibility as everyone knows that they are the worst hypocrites imaginable when it comes to shareholder accountability. A glance at the accounts of their subsidiaries shows that they have not been drafted with the object of keeping investors informed. Indeed, it is virtually impossible to disentangle the various figures shown in the accounts. WTV Directors refuse to answer reasonable questions about these accounts, as do the Auditors, a company called Brewin Dolphin. Isn't it Brewin Dolphin who have issued a "buy" broker's note for tph? Reminds me of the days when they issued lots of "buy" notes for WTV. Sadly this did not prevent the share price falling, then when the company diluted the shares and delisted from AIM, WTV shares became virtually worthless. That is brokers for you, I suppose! Makes you look at the current "buy" recommendation for TPH from Brewin Dolphin in a different light though. In view of the numerous subsidiaries which WTV has, it makes you wonder if TPH has any subsidiaries that can be sold off by Neville? If so, you can be sure, based upon Neville's record, that TPH investors will not benefit. Some anonymous investors could, though! As stated earlier, Neville does not have that many TPH shares compared to the other Directors. |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions
Hot Features
Premium
