We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Register for streaming realtime charts, analysis tools, and prices.
| Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Stock Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Telephonetics | TPH | London | Ordinary Share |
| Price Change | Price Change % | Share Price | Last Trade
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.00 | 0.00% | 8.75 | 01:00:00 |
| Open Price | Low Price | High Price | Close Price | Previous Close |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8.75 | 8.75 |
| Top Posts |
|---|
Posted at 28/6/2010 22:43 by effortless cool clocktower,It is classed as a reverse takover because TPH is bigger than NET and, hence, TPH shareholders effectively have control after the transaction. As I understand it, NET management will be in charge (Chairman/Chief Exec) post-transaction. |
Posted at 28/4/2010 09:32 by lbo Telephonetics (TPH, 8.5p, £9.28m) has won a multi-year contract with Ireland's largest cinema operator. Still a BUY.Telephonetics makes good start to year |
Posted at 15/3/2010 17:23 by mudbath clocktower,Who exactly is Mike Neville and what is his position within TPH. I do like the look of the fundementals here and also the seeming potential for revenue growth. |
Posted at 27/2/2010 16:28 by lbo Telephonetics (TPH, 7.5p, £8.19m) Finals to November 2009 saw revenues rise by 5.6% to £10.51m (£9.95m) with a first time contribution from the February 2009 acquisition of Datadialogs of £0.55m (reflecting a 27% growth from pre-purchase levels). PBT fell to £0.41m (£1.07m) with EPS of 0.33p (0.87p) and the group ended the period with net cash of £5.1m. With healthy cash balances and the ability to make further acquisitions we rate the company still as a BUY. |
Posted at 19/1/2010 20:36 by lbo A lot of AIM volume now trades on PLUS market. But I agree the performance and liquidity has been very poor. I wonder if the large shareholders are happy with the performance and liquidity? We can only assume they (the holders of 67.5%) are or would they not be looking for changes?Anthony Mckay 20,288,889 18.6% William Burgar 20,138,889 18.5% M Brooks Esq 12,909,843 11.8% Octopus 8,200,000 7.5% J Sandon-Allum Esq 6,333,333 5.8% Rathbones Investment Management 5,800,000 5.3% Companies with the following characteristics make for more attractive leverage buyout targets: * 1. Generate high levels of free cash flow relative to their valuations * 2. Have high net-cash/low existing debt balance sheets * 3. EV/EBITDA valuations are relatively low * 4. High level of insider (top-management) ownership * 5. Market conditions or investor perception that depresses stock price valuation TPH Mkt Cap = £8m - £4m cash = £4m EV and £1m EBITDA |
Posted at 15/1/2010 12:26 by deanroberthunt what you've been saying all along is that the market ECK an TPH are in has lots of growth potential.....but the forementioned haven't got the nouse to capitalise on it...... |
Posted at 18/12/2009 12:52 by deanroberthunt whilst ECK and TPH remain apart neither will achieve owt....so we have stalemate |
Posted at 23/3/2009 11:01 by lbo WHY ARE YOU HIDING FROM THE QUESTIONS RADCALHARDIN??LBO - 23 Mar'09 - 09:40 - 695 of 695 edit Can you also explain why you changed your post making accusations against Brewin Dolphin? REMEMBER THEY AND I HAVE THE ORIGINAL POST ON EMAIL! Can you also explain why you deleted posts? rascalhardin - 18 Mar'09 - 07:21 - 627 of 694 2t/John, Let me think...WTV is a specialist in the field of investor relations. They make most of their money from webcasting company results to the shareholders of much larger companies and by giving them IR advice. Sadly I cannot recommend them as Mike Neville was once Chairman. While Neville was Chairman of WTV, he disposed of a Swedish subsidiary called Kamera to some anonymous "high profile investors". When disposed of, Kamera was sold for thousands, however three years later, the anonymous investors sold the company for millions, thereby making a nice little earner at the expense of WTV shareholders. The current management of WTV, who like Neville have a very poor record of failed companies, have refused to provide shareholders with the names of these investors. So no, I cannot say I recommend WTV. Due in part to Mike Neville's input, they are now delisted and their shares are virtually untradeable. WTV has zero credibility as everyone knows that they are the worst hypocrites imaginable when it comes to shareholder accountability. A glance at the accounts of their subsidiaries shows that they have not been drafted with the object of keeping investors informed. Indeed, it is virtually impossible to disentangle the various figures shown in the accounts. WTV Directors refuse to answer reasonable questions about these accounts, as do the Auditors, a company called Brewin Dolphin. Isn't it Brewin Dolphin who have issued a "buy" broker's note for tph? Reminds me of the days when they issued lots of "buy" notes for WTV. Sadly this did not prevent the share price falling, then when the company diluted the shares and delisted from AIM, WTV shares became virtually worthless. That is brokers for you, I suppose! Makes you look at the current "buy" recommendation for TPH from Brewin Dolphin in a different light though. In view of the numerous subsidiaries which WTV has, it makes you wonder if TPH has any subsidiaries that can be sold off by Neville? If so, you can be sure, based upon Neville's record, that TPH investors will not benefit. Some anonymous investors could, though! As stated earlier, Neville does not have that many TPH shares compared to the other Directors. LBO - 18 Mar'09 - 10:52 - 628 of 694 edit Ok thanks Rascalhardin! I have copied your post and emailed it to Brewin Dolphin and lets see how they respond. Would you like to put it in writing aswell? info@brewin.co.uk rascalhardin - 18 Mar'09 - 11:01 - 629 of 694 All fact, LBO. Sadly. Are you close to Brewin Dolphin? rascalhardin - 18 Mar'09 - 11:01 - 630 of 694 . |
Posted at 23/3/2009 09:40 by lbo Can you also explain why you changed your post making accusations against Brewin Dolphin? REMEMBER THEY AND I HAVE THE ORIGINAL POST ON EMAIL! Can you also explain why you deleted posts?rascalhardin - 18 Mar'09 - 07:21 - 627 of 694 2t/John, Let me think...WTV is a specialist in the field of investor relations. They make most of their money from webcasting company results to the shareholders of much larger companies and by giving them IR advice. Sadly I cannot recommend them as Mike Neville was once Chairman. While Neville was Chairman of WTV, he disposed of a Swedish subsidiary called Kamera to some anonymous "high profile investors". When disposed of, Kamera was sold for thousands, however three years later, the anonymous investors sold the company for millions, thereby making a nice little earner at the expense of WTV shareholders. The current management of WTV, who like Neville have a very poor record of failed companies, have refused to provide shareholders with the names of these investors. So no, I cannot say I recommend WTV. Due in part to Mike Neville's input, they are now delisted and their shares are virtually untradeable. WTV has zero credibility as everyone knows that they are the worst hypocrites imaginable when it comes to shareholder accountability. A glance at the accounts of their subsidiaries shows that they have not been drafted with the object of keeping investors informed. Indeed, it is virtually impossible to disentangle the various figures shown in the accounts. WTV Directors refuse to answer reasonable questions about these accounts, as do the Auditors, a company called Brewin Dolphin. Isn't it Brewin Dolphin who have issued a "buy" broker's note for tph? Reminds me of the days when they issued lots of "buy" notes for WTV. Sadly this did not prevent the share price falling, then when the company diluted the shares and delisted from AIM, WTV shares became virtually worthless. That is brokers for you, I suppose! Makes you look at the current "buy" recommendation for TPH from Brewin Dolphin in a different light though. In view of the numerous subsidiaries which WTV has, it makes you wonder if TPH has any subsidiaries that can be sold off by Neville? If so, you can be sure, based upon Neville's record, that TPH investors will not benefit. Some anonymous investors could, though! As stated earlier, Neville does not have that many TPH shares compared to the other Directors. LBO - 18 Mar'09 - 10:52 - 628 of 694 edit Ok thanks Rascalhardin! I have copied your post and emailed it to Brewin Dolphin and lets see how they respond. Would you like to put it in writing aswell? info@brewin.co.uk rascalhardin - 18 Mar'09 - 11:01 - 629 of 694 All fact, LBO. Sadly. Are you close to Brewin Dolphin? rascalhardin - 18 Mar'09 - 11:01 - 630 of 694 . |
Posted at 18/3/2009 07:21 by rascalhardin 2t/John,Let me think...WTV is a specialist in the field of investor relations. They make most of their money from webcasting company results to the shareholders of much larger companies and by giving them IR advice. Sadly I cannot recommend them as Mike Neville was once Chairman. While Neville was Chairman of WTV, he disposed of a Swedish subsidiary called Kamera to some anonymous "high profile investors". When disposed of, Kamera was sold for thousands, however three years later, the anonymous investors sold the company for millions, thereby making a nice little earner at the expense of WTV shareholders. The current management of WTV, who like Neville have a very poor record of failed companies, have refused to provide shareholders with the names of these investors. So no, I cannot say I recommend WTV. Due in part to Mike Neville's input, they are now delisted and their shares are virtually untradeable. WTV has zero credibility as everyone knows that they are the worst hypocrites imaginable when it comes to shareholder accountability. A glance at the accounts of their subsidiaries shows that they have not been drafted with the object of keeping investors informed. Indeed, it is virtually impossible to disentangle the various figures shown in the accounts. WTV Directors refuse to answer reasonable questions about these accounts, as do the Auditors, a company called Brewin Dolphin. Isn't it Brewin Dolphin who have issued a "buy" broker's note for tph? Reminds me of the days when they issued lots of "buy" notes for WTV. Sadly this did not prevent the share price falling, then when the company diluted the shares and delisted from AIM, WTV shares became virtually worthless. That is brokers for you, I suppose! Makes you look at the current "buy" recommendation for TPH from Brewin Dolphin in a different light though. In view of the numerous subsidiaries which WTV has, it makes you wonder if TPH has any subsidiaries that can be sold off by Neville? If so, you can be sure, based upon Neville's record, that TPH investors will not benefit. Some anonymous investors could, though! As stated earlier, Neville does not have that many TPH shares compared to the other Directors. |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions
Hot Features
Premium
