|Skil Ports & Lg
||EPS - Basic
||Market Cap (m)
Skil Ports & Lg Share Discussion Threads
Showing 9576 to 9598 of 9600 messages
|I think its programmed that way...|
|By the time this is finished I will probably have died of old age.|
|Fishy port for fisherman...|
|By the time this is finished they'll be building the Karanja-Rewas bridge and no doubt that will cause major interruptions to creek/port traffic...|
Current Stock Price : £10.50|
|cheers. You would think they would have linked the old site to the new! 6m draft would be good if it proves accurate.|
|can't even find the new site. What's the url?|
|Mount Teide - when I asked the Board at last week's meeting, I was told 6.0m by Jay.|
|A few errors in the new website but I reported them and they seem to be updating. Website looks pretty good and I think the blog is a smart idea if they produce a steady of updates.
MT - thanks for keeping up the questions. We value your input, even if it is not always welcome news!|
|So , no new thread for MPL , this page not recording events , if you look up MPL on the LSE site the share price dropped today and L&G increased their holding . .|
its a worry
|You mean kiss of death with that ticker!...|
|New ticker: MPL
Cant see them being quite as successful as the last company that held that ticker...|
|As I have said it before its all in the name...AIM = Am I Mug?...
If every joe public stops buying AIM shares directly or indirectly via fundies then only something will be done about it....if the Indian economy is so booming then why didn't they just seek investors money in India?...|
|You don't have to be an expert. All you require is not to be a fool.|
|Guaranteed? Now everyone's an expert. I look forward to further news and sensible discussions again.|
|Don't worry - you will not be able to replace Gandhi. The institutional investors - the only power they really have is to withhold/give new money which is of course with other people's money.
It looks such a blatant case of corruption, and the UK institutional giving a new round of money without even demanding any relevant answer - one has to suspect whether they are part of the corruption racket too.
You will lose minimum 80-90% here over the next year or so as an equity holder - guaranteed!|
|Hope so. Gandhi no longer has a blocking stake.|
|Someone has parachuted Lord Flight into the mess, who and why? As in, is he the thin end of a wedge to remove the existing Board?|
|10M - is that the last of Gandhi's holding sold?|
|I see the directors backed up the truck to load up...
Well, tonka toy trucks at least, probably the same ones they used on site...|
|I would have thought the new investor in conjunction with other large outside investors...would have a new man/woman working together with Gandhi so latest updates can be more reassuring...so there is no element of dodgy happenings...is the new investor playing with his/her money or other peoples money?..|
|SKIL Ports & Logistics Limited Placing, Open Offer and Subcriptions
'The Directors expect that the continued expansion of JNPT will represent significant opportunities for the Company. In particular, the Directors believe that the Company will benefit from the Facility being able to offer:
-- mid-stream discharge and loading of cargo at anchorage whilst vessels wait to berth at JNPT;'
This is MISREPRESENTATION on an epic scale !
I would like the Directors(particularly, the non-execs), to explain to shareholders how the vessels operating to JNPT, which are almost without exception pure container carriers (huge deep sea vessels that are GEAR-LESS - with no cranes on board), loaded with containers routinely stacked on deck up to 10 to 12 high, can be discharged in the anchorage?
The air draft, distance from sea level to top of the highest deck container stack on board these vessels is routinely 35m - 40m, the height of a 14 storey block of residential flats!
The small transhipment barges used in Mumbai Harbour are mostly gear-less, and of the few that do have lifting equipment; it is a tiny fraction of the specification required to handle containers to/from these ships.
The executive management are clueless, totally clueless.
Why are the non execs allowing the execs to put out such false and misleading information in a OPEN OFFER AND PLACING DOCUMENT?
'By the end of January 2017 the Company expects to have:
-- completed the dredging requirement;
-- reclaimed 70 per cent. of the land; and
-- constructed two berths, one of which will be capable of receiving vessels. '
With this timeline now just two months away - perhaps the Directors can update a disbelieving market, never mind Industry Professionals, as to how they are progressing against this absurd target of having 140 acres of land reclaimed and 2 berths complete, with one capable of handling vessels? When it took them more than 6 months just to complete 100m of piling(25% of that required for just two small berths!
edit - Have spoken to Cenkos, who predictably were unable to answer any of a number of questions put to them, but will pass them on for reply!|